Relationship Graph Explorer
Follow the connections
Every herb, ingredient, formula, gene target, and disease — connected through real research. Search, pick a subject, and navigate the graph in any direction.
🌿
Herb
6,826
→
⚗️
Ingredient
45,885
→
🧬
Gene Target
15,695
→
🏥
Disease
30,467
→
🧪
Evidence
23,241
trials · metas · refs
Plus 6,743 TCM formulas connecting herbs together
🏥 Disease / Health Topic
Fungal Eye Infections
0
Clinical Trials
0
Meta-Analyses
0
PubMed References
🏥 All Disease / Health Topic data fields for Fungal Eye Infections
🏥 Names
Disease Name
Fungal Eye Infections
Alias Names
Eye Infections, Fungal
Topic Type
group
🧬 Ontology Classifications
DisGeNET Type
group
UMLS Type
Disease or Syndrome
MeSH Class
Eye Diseases; Infections
🔗 External References
🔍 Raw view — every non-empty column on this row (23 fields)
name
Fungal Eye Infections
alias name
Eye Infections, Fungal
topic type
group
disgenet disease type
group
umls disease type
Disease or Syndrome
mesh disease class
Eye Diseases; Infections
umls disease type id
T047
mesh disease class id
C01; C11
herb disease id
HBDIS001019
disgenet id
C0015405
mesh id
D015821
No relationships found yet for this entity. Try picking one of the top-researched items above.
How to read these connections
Each box lists records connected to the one you are viewing, and says how the connection was made. A connection shows that two records are related in the source data. It does not show that something works, is safe or should be used, and a record with many connections is not necessarily better studied or more effective.
- Study records (trials, systematic reviews, publications): the study names this subject. Registered or ongoing studies have no results here, and animal or cell research does not show an effect in people.
- Source-database links (for example herb and compound, compound and gene target): taken from the imported databases and not independently checked by us.
- Name matches (for example formula and herb, or a condition named in a study): found by matching names, so they can be wrong. Treat them as leads, not findings.