Strong proof exists only for the prescription solution in three rare epilepsies. For anxiety, sleep and pain the evidence is weak or mixed. Liver enzyme rises, sleepiness, drug interactions and mislabelled products are real concerns.
Best evidence: high certainty12 uses rated · 53 sources
Safety first: the main risks are psychosis and mental health problems with heavy or daily use, cannabis use disorder (about 22% of people who use cannabis), cannabis hyperemesis syndrome, driving impairment, low birth weight and preterm birth, and serious poisoning in young children from edibles.
Best evidence: moderate14 uses rated · 57 sources
Safety first: THCA converts to THC with heat, so the risks of THC apply to products that are smoked, vaped or baked: psychosis and mental health problems with heavy use, dependence (about 22% of people who use cannabis), driving impairment, harm in pregnancy and poisoning of children.
Best evidence: low8 uses rated · 56 sources
No trial has tested CBDA on its own in people. Two small human studies used mixed products, and one of them had no placebo group. Almost everything else is mouse, rat or cell work, mostly from a few research groups. Safety, drug interactions and product accuracy are unstudied or poor.
Best evidence: very low12 uses rated · 58 sources
No study of CBGA alone in people was found. The evidence is mouse, dog, cell and test-tube research, with mixed seizure results in mice, and several studies are linked to companies or patents. Safety in people is unknown.
Best evidence: not enough evidence10 uses rated · 40 sources
A handful of small human studies and two surveys exist, mostly in healthy adults and often company-linked. They found few side effects and little proof of benefit. Most other claims rest on mouse, rat or cell work. Liver effects with repeated use, drug interactions and product accuracy are unstudied.
Best evidence: very low15 uses rated · 49 sources
Human research is five placebo-controlled or comparison trials in sleep (20 to about 1,800 people), a few old volunteer studies and several reviews. The sleep-recording trial and the 7-night trial both missed their main result; the larger home trials were industry-funded or company-run.
Best evidence: low12 uses rated · 55 sources
No trial has tested CBC alone in people. The only human data are a 43-person blood-level pilot of a CBD-rich oil and a 12-week study of capsules where one of three held 3 mg CBC among other cannabinoids; both come with big limits. Everything else is mice, rats or cells.
Best evidence: very low8 uses rated · 36 sources
Human research is one 13-week diabetes trial, a 10-man pilot, two brain-scan studies, a 90-day study of a THCV plus CBD strip, a trial of the man-made delta-8 form in 21 adults and some urine-testing studies. The diabetes trial missed its main target. Findings on weight are mixed and mostly not about THCV alone.
Best evidence: low10 uses rated · 41 sources
No human trial of THCVA and no animal study of the pure compound were found. The evidence is one computer model, one cell and enzyme study in which THCVA was one of 11 compounds, and two dish studies of whole cannabis extracts. The rest of the 23 PubMed records are chemistry and forensic work.
Best evidence: not enough evidence3 uses rated · 18 sources
Human research is two small seizure studies, a nerve-pain trial, two single-dose brain-scan studies in men, and a few registered trials that ended early or have no results. The main trial, in adults with focal seizures, found no difference from placebo. A trial in children with autism is still recruiting.
Best evidence: not enough evidence11 uses rated · 52 sources
There is no human study. The research is a handful of cell, enzyme and computer studies and a few mouse experiments, mostly reporting CBGV beside many other compounds with few or no numbers in the abstracts. Nothing here shows that CBGV helps or harms any condition.
Best evidence: not enough evidence8 uses rated · 23 sources
Safety and honesty first: most evidence is from animals or cells. In people, the only study of pure myrcene is a 10-person driving-simulator pilot, which suggests impairment. The other human studies tested mixtures. Rodents given very high doses for two years developed kidney and liver tumours;
Best evidence: very low7 uses rated · 40 sources
Safety and honesty first: nearly all evidence is from animals, cells or small human studies. In people, the best-designed study is a 20-person vaporizer trial in which a high d-limonene dose lowered anxious and paranoid ratings after THC but changed nothing else. Orange-scent studies used whole oil.
Best evidence: low12 uses rated · 53 sources
Safety and honesty first: only alpha-pinene has been tested with THC in people, in one 19-person vaporizer trial that found no effect on THC memory impairment. Everything else is from animals, cells, whole oils or mixtures.
Best evidence: very low12 uses rated · 45 sources
Safety and honesty first: the best human evidence is for Silexan, an oral lavender oil capsule, and it is not linalool. Pure linalool has been studied mainly in mice, rats and cells, with two very small human inhalation trials (shingles nerve pain, carpal tunnel) and one 24-person stress experiment.
Best evidence: low14 uses rated · 62 sources
Evidence first: most results are from cells and mice and are labelled that way. The CB2 binding finding has not been cleanly replicated, and no human trial of BCP alone shows a health benefit. Safety data in people are small and short.
Best evidence: very low10 uses rated · 29 sources
Safety and honesty first: nearly all evidence is from cells and animals. In rodents, humulene lowered inflammation signals and allergic lung inflammation. Results on cannabis-like and pain effects disagree between mouse and rat studies. No human trial of isolated humulene was found, so no health benefit is established.
Best evidence: mixed6 uses rated · 33 sources
Safety and honesty first: almost all evidence is from mice, fish, cells or computer models. In mice, inhaled terpinolene lowered movement and lengthened barbiturate sleep. In people, the only studies are a survey, one observational study that reported no terpinolene result in its abstract, and two small trials of whole oils.
Best evidence: very low11 uses rated · 43 sources
Safety and honesty first: there is no human study of ocimene on its own, so no health benefit is established. In rats, ocimene lowered swelling, inflammation signals and stomach ulcers; in a rat toxin model it was linked with less clumping of a Parkinson-related brain protein; in dishes it stopped a parasite from growing.
Best evidence: very low7 uses rated · 26 sources
Safety and honesty first: there is no human trial of alpha-terpineol alone. The mouse studies suggest less pain behaviour, the cell studies suggest lower inflammation signals and tumour-cell killing, and the rat studies suggest stomach and heart effects, but none of this is shown in people.
Best evidence: very low12 uses rated · 41 sources
Safety and honesty first: nearly all evidence is from cells and animals. In dishes and mice, nerolidol acted on parasites, pain and inflammation signals, anxiety-like behaviour and seizures, and it increased drug passage through human skin samples.
Best evidence: very low9 uses rated · 43 sources
Safety and honesty first: nearly all evidence is from cells and animals. In mice, bisabolol lowered skin and paw inflammation and pain responses. One small study tested a bisabolol cream on 28 women for skin lightening. No trial of bisabolol alone was found, so no health benefit is established.
Best evidence: very low9 uses rated · 32 sources
Safety and honesty first: almost everything known about pure geraniol comes from mice, rats and cells. The only human trials are two small studies of one gut-targeted supplement for irritable bowel syndrome, one with 56 people, by authors linked to the company.
Best evidence: low11 uses rated · 43 sources
Safety and honesty first: there is no human trial of camphene alone. Rat studies suggest lower blood fats, mouse studies suggest less pain behaviour and less liver fat, and cell studies suggest antioxidant action and the killing of tumour cells and microbes, but none of this is shown in people.
Best evidence: very low13 uses rated · 36 sources
Safety and honesty first: eucalyptol is the one cannabis-linked terpene with randomised trials of a purified capsule, but those trials are in airway disease, not cannabis, and the main ones were funded by the maker. A COPD trial of 242 adults and a bronchitis trial of 242 adults were funded by a Cassella-med grant.
Best evidence: moderate13 uses rated · 46 sources
Safety and honesty first: there is no human trial of guaiol and no human safety study. Most research is by one group in China that tested pure (-)-guaiol on lung cancer cells and in mouse tumour models; in these studies it killed cells and changed immune and growth signals, and none of this is shown in people.
Best evidence: very low9 uses rated · 30 sources
No compound page matches all the icons you picked. Tap an icon again to remove it.