Relationship Graph Explorer
Follow the connections
Every herb, ingredient, formula, gene target, and disease — connected through real research. Search, pick a subject, and navigate the graph in any direction.
🌿
Herb
6,826
→
⚗️
Ingredient
45,885
→
🧬
Gene Target
15,695
→
🏥
Disease
30,467
→
🧪
Evidence
23,241
trials · metas · refs
Plus 6,743 TCM formulas connecting herbs together
3 Diseases matching "Mumps"
🏥 Disease / Health Topic
Mumps
0
Clinical Trials
1
Meta-Analyses
0
PubMed References
📋 Sample Trials
None linked yet.
📊 Sample Meta-Analyses
CRD42022327802
Clinical efficacy evaluation and Potential Mechanism on Pudilan Xiaoyan Oral Liquid in Treatment of Mumps in Children based on Meta-Analysis, Network Pharmacology, and Molecular Docking
Mumps falls under the category of epidemiology, infectious diseases, pediatric d
📚 Sample References
None linked yet.
🏥 All Disease / Health Topic data fields for Mumps
🏥 Names
Disease Name
Mumps
Alias Names
Mumps
Topic Type
syndrome
🧬 Ontology Classifications
DisGeNET Type
disease
UMLS Type
Disease or Syndrome
MeSH Class
Stomatognathic Diseases; Infections
DO Class
disease of anatomical entity; disease by infectious agent
🔗 External References
🔍 Raw view — every non-empty column on this row (27 fields)
name
Mumps
alias name
Mumps
topic type
syndrome
disgenet disease type
disease
umls disease type
Disease or Syndrome
mesh disease class
Stomatognathic Diseases; Infections
do disease class
disease of anatomical entity; disease by infectious agent
umls disease type id
T047
mesh disease class id
C01; C07
do disease class id
DOID:0050117; DOID:7
herb disease id
HBDIS001994
disgenet id
C0026780
mesh id
D009107
do id
10264
icd10 id
B26
📊 Meta-Analyses
1 · systematic reviewCRD42022327802 Clinical efficacy evaluation and Potential Mechanism on Pudilan Xiaoyan Oral Liq
→ Mumps falls under the category of epidemiology, in
How to read these connections
Each box lists records connected to the one you are viewing, and says how the connection was made. A connection shows that two records are related in the source data. It does not show that something works, is safe or should be used, and a record with many connections is not necessarily better studied or more effective.
- Study records (trials, systematic reviews, publications): the study names this subject. Registered or ongoing studies have no results here, and animal or cell research does not show an effect in people.
- Source-database links (for example herb and compound, compound and gene target): taken from the imported databases and not independently checked by us.
- Name matches (for example formula and herb, or a condition named in a study): found by matching names, so they can be wrong. Treat them as leads, not findings.