Relationship Graph Explorer
Follow the connections
Every herb, ingredient, formula, gene target, and disease — connected through real research. Search, pick a subject, and navigate the graph in any direction.
🌿
Herb
6,826
→
⚗️
Ingredient
45,885
→
🧬
Gene Target
15,695
→
🏥
Disease
30,467
→
🧪
Evidence
23,241
trials · metas · refs
Plus 6,743 TCM formulas connecting herbs together
1 Diseases matching "dysuria"
🏥 Disease / Health Topic
Dysuria
0
Clinical Trials
1
Meta-Analyses
0
PubMed References
📋 Sample Trials
None linked yet.
📊 Sample Meta-Analyses
CRD42022313042
EFFECTS OF GARLIC (ALLIUM SATIVUM) ON THE TREATMENT OF VULVOVAGINAL CANDIASIS IN COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL PHARMACOLOGICAL THERAPY: SISTEMATIC REVIEW
Candida albica most commonly found in samples is clinical, corresponding to 70-8
📚 Sample References
None linked yet.
🏥 All Disease / Health Topic data fields for Dysuria
🏥 Names
Disease Name
Dysuria
Alias Names
Painful Or Difficult Urination; Pain Associated With Micturition; Painful Micturition, Unspecified; Dysuria
Topic Type
phenotype
🧬 Ontology Classifications
DisGeNET Type
phenotype
UMLS Type
Sign or Symptom
MeSH Class
Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
HPO Class
Abnormality of the genitourinary system
🔗 External References
🔍 Raw view — every non-empty column on this row (27 fields)
name
Dysuria
alias name
Painful Or Difficult Urination; Pain Associated With Micturition; Painful Micturition, Unspecified; Dysuria
topic type
phenotype
disgenet disease type
phenotype
umls disease type
Sign or Symptom
mesh disease class
Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
hpo disease class
Abnormality of the genitourinary system
umls disease type id
T184
mesh disease class id
C23
hpo disease class id
HP:0000119
herb disease id
HBDIS000866
disgenet id
C0013428
mesh id
D053159
hpo id
HP:0100518
icd10 id
R30.0; R30; R30.9
No relationships found yet for this entity. Try picking one of the top-researched items above.
How to read these connections
Each box lists records connected to the one you are viewing, and says how the connection was made. A connection shows that two records are related in the source data. It does not show that something works, is safe or should be used, and a record with many connections is not necessarily better studied or more effective.
- Study records (trials, systematic reviews, publications): the study names this subject. Registered or ongoing studies have no results here, and animal or cell research does not show an effect in people.
- Source-database links (for example herb and compound, compound and gene target): taken from the imported databases and not independently checked by us.
- Name matches (for example formula and herb, or a condition named in a study): found by matching names, so they can be wrong. Treat them as leads, not findings.