Skip to content
AlternativeMed

Creatine HCl, Buffered, Ethyl Ester, Nitrate and Other Marketed Forms: What Evidence Exists

Form by form, what creatine HCl, buffered, ethyl ester, nitrate, citrate and malate are claimed to do and what reviews and trials actually compared, with no results carried across forms.

Content last updated . This page has not been medically reviewed.

Quick answer
Each marketed creatine form is a different product, so a result in one form does not carry over to another. A 2011 review found little to no evidence that newer forms are more effective or safer than monohydrate. [1] A 2022 systematic review of 17 trials found no consistent performance benefit for alternative forms versus placebo, and only 3 trials compared an alternative form with monohydrate. [2] Newer single trials exist, and a few point the other way; they are small, short and mostly measure performance rather than health. This page is information only. A clinician or pharmacist can help with personal decisions.

Evidence labels: "insufficient evidence" means too little or inconsistent research; "mixed" means trials disagree; "marketing claim" means a seller's statement not tested independently. Several authors of the reviews disclose ties to creatine or supplement companies. [3] [4]

Form by form

FormMarketing claimWhat the sources foundEvidence label
Creatine HClMore soluble, so more bioavailable and needed in smaller amountsClaim traced to a solubility report (about 37.9 times more soluble in water than monohydrate), not a direct tissue comparison [3]. Trials: see belowMixed
Buffered (alkaline)Greater stability and up to 10 times more bioavailable [3]28-day trial, 36 resistance-trained people: no greater change in muscle creatine, body composition or training results than monohydrate [5]Insufficient evidence
Ethyl esterFaster absorption7-week trial, 30 untrained men: lower serum creatine than monohydrate, similar muscle creatine and no group differences in strength or body composition [6]; a 4-week soccer trial found larger gains with ethyl ester on some measures [7]Mixed
NitrateCreatine plus nitratePlasma creatine after one dose was lower than with 5 g of monohydrate at both nitrate amounts tested (1.5 g and 3 g) in a pharmacokinetic study [3]; a 7-day trial found no exercise gains [8]Insufficient evidence
Citrate, malate, pyruvate, magnesium chelateBetter dissolving or extra benefitsResearched forms with no consistent performance benefit [2]Insufficient evidence

Creatine HCl in more detail

The "38 times" claim comes from a report that creatine HCl was 37.9 times more soluble in water than monohydrate at 25 degrees C. The review points out the two were assessed at different saturation pH values and that the researchers did not directly compare plasma or tissue creatine. [3] Since then, trials have compared the two forms:
  • 40 people aged 18-25 trained with weights for 8 weeks, taking HCl or monohydrate (study amount 0.03 g per kg body mass, with one monohydrate group also loading). Both improved strength and muscle size versus placebo, with HCl showing no benefit over monohydrate. [9]
  • 40 collegiate male soccer players over 4 weeks of repeated sprint training: all creatine groups beat placebo, and the HCl and ethyl ester groups showed larger gains in jump, sprint and peak power than the monohydrate group. [7] The abstract reports 10 people per group.
  • 36 perimenopausal and menopausal women for 8 weeks received HCl at study amounts of 750 or 1,500 mg per day, or a combination with ethyl ester, or placebo. Medium-dose HCl beat placebo on reaction time and measured frontal brain creatine, and all products were well tolerated. [10] There was no monohydrate comparison, and brain creatine is a biomarker, not a clinical outcome.

Mixed results from small trials do not settle the question. See also Creatine monohydrate vs HCl and other forms.

Ethyl ester, buffered and nitrate

  • Ethyl ester is a chemically altered creatine and is not creatine itself, according to a review, which also reports that it rapidly degrades to creatinine in stomach acid. [3] In the 7-week trial, in which participants were randomized to placebo, monohydrate or ethyl ester at about 20 g/day for 5 days then about 5 g/day (study amounts), serum creatinine was higher with ethyl ester than with placebo or monohydrate. [6]
  • Buffered products add alkaline ingredients; the 2022 review found that neither recommended nor loading-equivalent amounts produced greater changes than monohydrate. [3]
  • Nitrate: by molecular weight creatine nitrate contains 67.5% creatine. [3] A 2016 review said the safety of creatine nitrate had been evaluated but still needs further investigation. [11] Proper evidence not found for head-to-head performance trials against monohydrate in the sources we searched.

Content per gram

Theoretical creatine by weight: HCl 78.2%, nitrate 67.5%, citrate 40.6% and malate 49.4%, versus 87.9% for monohydrate. [3] The same weight of product therefore holds different amounts of creatine. See creatine amounts in studies.

Blends and serums

In one marketplace survey of 175 products, 16 forms other than monohydrate were found, and 21.7% were blends of different creatine forms. [12] The review also describes an oral "serum" product sold as 2.5 g of creatine per 5 mL; testing found less than 10 mg of creatine and 69 mg of creatinine per dose. [3]

Frequently asked questions

Is creatine HCl better than monohydrate?

One 8-week trial found no benefit over monohydrate, [9] and one 4-week soccer trial found larger gains with HCl on some measures. [7] Both are small; the evidence is mixed.

Does creatine ethyl ester work?

In a 7-week trial of 30 untrained men it raised serum creatine less than monohydrate, while muscle creatine rose in both groups with no difference between them. [6] A 4-week soccer trial reported larger gains with ethyl ester on some measures. [7]

Is buffered creatine gentler?

Proper evidence not found for a stomach benefit in the sources we read. A trial found no extra change in muscle creatine or training results. [5]

Is creatine nitrate different because of the nitrate?

A 7-day trial in 12 male athletes found no exercise gains from creatine nitrate. [8]

Why do some trials disagree?

Different forms, small groups, short durations and different populations. Industry ties among authors can also matter. [3]

More details: evidence, limits and cautions

The details behind this page: cautions, limits of the evidence and where sources disagree. Open any note to read it.

Safety and who should ask first
Safety data are thinner for forms other than monohydrate. [3] People with kidney disease, anyone taking medicines that affect the kidneys, and anyone pregnant or breastfeeding should ask a clinician first; see Creatine and kidney disease and Medication interactions. Human pregnancy studies of creatine supplements: none were described in the 2021 paper we read. [4] Product quality is covered on Quality testing and certifications.
References
  1. Jager R, Purpura M, Shao A, Inoue T, Kreider RB. Analysis of the efficacy, safety, and regulatory status of novel forms of creatine. Amino Acids 2011. Read 2026-10-22.
  2. Fazio C, Elder CL, Harris MM. Efficacy of Alternative Forms of Creatine Supplementation on Improving Performance and Body Composition in Healthy Subjects: A Systematic Review. J Strength Cond Res 2022. Read 2026-10-22.
  3. Kreider RB, Jager R, Purpura M. Bioavailability, Efficacy, Safety, and Regulatory Status of Creatine and Related Compounds: A Critical Review. Nutrients 2022. Read 2026-10-22.
  4. Antonio J, Candow DG, Forbes SC, et al. Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: what does the scientific evidence really show? J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2021. Read 2026-10-22.
  5. Jagim AR, Oliver JM, Sanchez A, et al. A buffered form of creatine does not promote greater changes in muscle creatine content, body composition, or training adaptations than creatine monohydrate. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2012. Read 2026-10-22.
  6. Spillane M, Schoch R, Cooke M, et al. The effects of creatine ethyl ester supplementation combined with heavy resistance training on body composition, muscle performance, and serum and muscle creatine levels. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2009. Read 2026-10-22.
  7. Duan C, Wang Z, Wang Q. Creatine formulations and repeated sprint training: effects on physical and physiological adaptations in soccer players during the short-term preparation phase. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2026. Read 2026-10-22.
  8. Mabrey G, Koozehchian MS, Newton AT, et al. The Effect of Creatine Nitrate and Caffeine Individually or Combined on Exercise Performance and Cognitive Function: A Randomized, Crossover, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2024. Read 2026-10-22.
  9. Eghbali E, Arazi H, Suzuki K. Supplementing with which form of creatine (hydrochloride or monohydrate) alongside resistance training can have more impacts on anabolic/catabolic hormones, strength and body composition? Physiol Res 2024. Read 2026-10-22.
  10. Korovljev D, Ostojic J, Panic J, et al. The Effects of 8-Week Creatine Hydrochloride and Creatine Ethyl Ester Supplementation on Cognition, Clinical Outcomes, and Brain Creatine Levels in Perimenopausal and Menopausal Women (CONCRET-MENOPA): A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Nutr Assoc 2026. Read 2026-10-22.
  11. Deldicque L, Francaux M. Potential harmful effects of dietary supplements in sports medicine. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2016. Read 2026-10-22.
  12. Escalante G, Gonzalez AM, St Mart D, et al. Analysis of the efficacy, safety, and cost of alternative forms of creatine available for purchase on Amazon.com: are label claims supported by science? Heliyon 2022. Read 2026-10-22.
Education, not medical advice. This page is for general information. It does not diagnose or treat any condition and is not a substitute for care from a qualified health professional. Natural does not automatically mean safe. Ask a clinician or pharmacist before changing your care, especially if you take medication, are pregnant or breastfeeding, or have a health condition.