Skip to content
AlternativeMed
Cold plunge and sauna: a round wooden cold-water tub beside a sauna bench with folded white towels and a wooden bucket and ladle, with a window onto greenery

Specialty Topics · Wellness practice

Cold and Heat Exposure: Cold Plunges, Saunas and Biohacking Claims

Cold and heat exposure (cold plunges, ice baths, cold showers, saunas and contrast therapy) · also called Cold plunge, ice bath, cold-water immersion, cold shower, sauna, contrast therapy, hot and cold therapy, inmersion en agua fria, sauna, terapia de contraste

Cold and heat exposure means using cold plunges, cold showers, saunas or hot baths on purpose for health or performance. The evidence is small: cold water may ease post-exercise soreness, and Finnish men who used saunas often had fewer deaths, but those studies are mostly low quality or observational. Cold shock, heart strain, fainting, overheating and drowning are real risks, and alcohol and being alone make them worse.

General information, not medical advice. Last substantive update · Not medically reviewed. A named clinician has not signed off on this page. How this page is made

About Cold and Heat Exposure: Cold Plunges, Saunas and Biohacking Claims

Cold and heat exposure means deliberately using cold plunges, ice baths, cold showers, saunas or hot baths to chase a health benefit. Some claims have small, low-certainty support: cold-water immersion for post-exercise soreness, a cold-ending shower for sick days, and Finnish sauna use linked to lower mortality (observational). Others do not hold up: cold plunges lowering inflammation, or any fat-loss or longevity 'reset'. Cold shock, cardiac events, drowning, fainting from low blood pressure and alcohol are the real dangers.

What this page covers

This is the claims check for cold plunges, cold showers, saunas and contrast therapy as used in biohacking. The traditional water treatments are on the hydrotherapy pages; this page asks what research shows for the modern claims.

Cold-water immersion in the studies read means water below about 15 C; saunas range from roughly 45 to 100 C depending on type. Times and temperatures on this page appear only as reported in studies and are not advice.

4 17

Cold exposure: what studies found

For muscle soreness after exercise, 17 small trials favour cold-water immersion over rest, with low certainty. For stress, sleep and mood the picture is mixed, and inflammation markers rise right afterwards. A cold-ending shower cut sick days from work in one trial but not days of illness. After strength training, repeated cold immersion may blunt muscle gains.

A survey of regular plungers found better reported mental health and shorter colds up to about twice a week, then worse, but it cannot show cause.

4 6 5 18 8

Heat exposure: what studies found

Finnish men who used saunas 4 to 7 times a week had lower rates of sudden cardiac death, all-cause death, high blood pressure and dementia than men who used one a week. These are observational findings from one region and cannot prove cause.

Heat treatments lower blood pressure for hours, but lasting benefit is unproven. A single supervised session of whole-body heating helped depression in one very small trial; reviews call this promising but not ready for recommendations.

13 14 21 20 10 9

What is not shown

No trial read shows that cold plunges or saunas melt fat, extend life or 'reset' the nervous system. Evidence for contrast therapy and cold-air chambers is weak or very low quality.

19 7

At a glance

Traditional uses history, not proof

  • Sauna bathing is a long Finnish tradition, mainly for pleasure and relaxation
  • Cold plunges, cold showers and hot baths are modern biohacking and recovery habits more than single traditional remedies

Studied for research

  • Muscle soreness after exercise, low certainty
  • Sick days from work with a cold shower, low certainty
  • Stress, sleep and mood with cold immersion, mixed
  • Sauna use and heart disease and death, low certainty (observational)
  • Sauna and blood pressure, low certainty
  • Whole-body heating for depression, low certainty
  • Cold immersion for inflammation, against (markers rose)

Main compounds

  • Cold-water immersion
  • Cold shower
  • Finnish sauna
  • Contrast water therapy
  • Whole-body hyperthermia

Common forms

  • Cold plunge or ice bath
  • Cold-ending shower
  • Dry or Finnish sauna
  • Contrast (hot then cold) bathing

Research links: Cochrane review: cold-water immersion for muscle soreness · Cold showering and work: randomised trial (3,018 adults) · Sauna bathing and mortality, Finnish cohort (2,315 men) · Cold-water immersion review: wellbeing meta-analysis · Beyond hypothermia: cold-water death mechanisms (2026 review) · Research Library · Genes & Biomarkers Library

What it is and its history

Accepted scientific name
Cold and heat exposure (deliberate use of cold water, cold showers, saunas and hot baths for health claims)
Common names
Cold plunge (English); Ice bath (English); Cold-water immersion (English); Sauna bathing (English); Contrast therapy (English); Inmersion en agua fria (Spanish); Sauna (Spanish); Baño de contraste (Spanish)
Family or group
Temperature-exposure practices, often grouped with biohacking and hydrotherapy.
Look-alikes and adulterants
Name: Hydrotherapy; Note: The traditional water-treatment page has its own entry.; Name: Wim Hof-style breathing with cold; Note: Not reviewed here.; Name: Whole-body cryotherapy; Note: Extremely cold air chambers, a different practice from a cold plunge.; Name: Infrared sauna; Note: Not reviewed separately here.

Traditional use and history history, not clinical proof

Tradition or eraDocumented useSource
Finnish sauna traditionA 2018 review says sauna bathing has been a tradition in Finland for thousands of years, mainly for pleasure and relaxation, and is becoming popular in many other populations.p30077204

Traditional use shows how it was used. It does not show that it works or is safe today.

What is inside, and how it may work

What it contains and how those compounds act in cells and animals. Laboratory and animal mechanisms are not proven effects in people.

Main compounds

CompoundFamilyWhere it is concentratedActivity studiedLevel of evidence
Cold-water immersioncold exposure
The Cochrane review defines cold-water immersion as water below 15 C; the 2025 review pooled trials at 7 to 15 C for 30 seconds to 2 hours.
Studied for soreness, mood, stress, sleep, immunity and training adaptations. 4 6Human data
Cold showercold exposure
The Dutch trial used a hot shower ending with 30, 60 or 90 seconds of cold.
Studied for sick days. 5Human data
Finnish saunaheat exposure
A review describes typical sauna temperatures as 45 to 100 C, depending on type.
Observed in Finnish cohorts for heart disease, blood pressure and dementia. 17 13Human (observational)
Contrast water therapyhot and cold
Alternating hot and cold water; included in the network meta-analysis.
Studied for muscle soreness. 19Human data
Whole-body hyperthermiaheat exposure
Supervised heating in a clinic; the review notes target temperatures of 38 to 39 C gave larger effects.
Studied for depression. 10 9Human data
Whole-body cryotherapycold exposure
Extremely cold dry air (below -100 C) for 2 to 4 minutes in a chamber, per the Cochrane review.
Studied for muscle soreness; evidence very low quality. 7Human data

Mechanisms, receptors and pathways

Target or pathwayGene or receptorWhat was foundLevel
Cold shock responseNot specifiedSkin cooling triggers a gasp, fast breathing, racing heart and raised blood pressure; the response shrinks with repeated immersions. 2 1Human data
Heat stress and blood vesselsNot specifiedReviews propose that heat improves blood-vessel function and lowers blood pressure; this is proposed, not shown by the cohort studies. 15 20Hypothesis (review)
10benefits and uses looked at
23studies and sources checked
Low certaintybest evidence rating found
2lab markers tracked in trials

2 mixed findings5 low certainty3 very low certainty

What was looked at

The 10 benefits and uses checked for Cold and Heat Exposure: Cold Plunges, Saunas and Biohacking Claims, each with how strong the evidence is. Tap one to open it.

Lab markers tracked in the studies

Inflammation markers after cold-water immersionBlood pressure after heat exposure

What is Cold and Heat Exposure: Cold Plunges, Saunas and Biohacking Claims good for?

The claims studied for cold and heat exposure and how strong the human evidence is for each.

Cold-water immersion for muscle soreness after exerciseLow certaintyA Cochrane review of 17 small, low-quality trials found people who sat in cold water after exercise reported less muscle soreness over the next one to four days than people who rested. A newer comparison of ten recovery methods ranked hot packs and contrast water ahead for pain in the first 24 hours, and the authors say none of the evidence is strong. Cold plunges after strength training: do they cost you muscle?Mixed findingsA review of the research says that using cold-water immersion after every strength session may blunt gains in strength, power and muscle size over weeks, even while it helps people feel recovered sooner. Endurance training gains did not seem to be harmed. Cold showers and sick daysLow certaintyIn a Dutch trial of 3,018 adults, people who finished their daily shower with 30, 60 or 90 seconds of cold water took 29 percent fewer sick days from work than people who did not. The number of days they actually felt ill did not change. Cold-water immersion for stress, mood, sleep and inflammationMixed findingsA 2025 review of 11 trials (3,177 people) found stress was lower 12 hours after cold immersion, sleep quality and quality of life improved, but mood did not, and markers of inflammation actually rose right after the dip. The authors say the evidence is thin. Regular cold plungers and colds: a surveyVery low certaintyIn an online survey, 732 regular cold-water plungers reported better mental health and shorter colds and sick leave than 501 non-plungers. Benefits seemed greatest at about twice a week, and results got worse beyond that. Because it is a survey, it cannot show the plunges caused the difference. Whole-body hyperthermia (heat in a clinic) for depressionLow certaintyIn one small, careful trial, 30 adults with major depression who had a single clinical session of whole-body heating felt less depressed than those who had a sham session, for up to six weeks. A review of seven small studies agrees the idea is promising but says there is not enough evidence to recommend it. This was medically supervised, not a home sauna. Frequent sauna bathing and heart disease and death (Finnish men)Low certaintyIn a study of 2,315 middle-aged Finnish men followed for about 21 years, those who used a sauna 4 to 7 times a week had about a third of the sudden-cardiac-death risk of those who used it once a week, and lower overall death rates. This is an observational link: it does not prove that saunas protect the heart. Frequent sauna bathing and dementiaVery low certaintyIn the same Finnish group of men, those who used a sauna 4 to 7 times a week were diagnosed with dementia and Alzheimer's disease about a third as often as those who used it once a week. Again this shows a link, not a cause. Sauna and blood pressureLow certaintyIn the Finnish cohort, men who used a sauna 4 to 7 times a week developed high blood pressure about half as often as those who used it once a week. A 2026 review found blood pressure falls for a while after heat treatments, but whether regular use lowers blood pressure for good is unproven. Contrast water therapy and heat for muscle sorenessVery low certaintyA network meta-analysis of 59 trials (1,367 people) ranked hot packs first and contrast water therapy second for easing soreness in the first 24 hours after exercise. The authors say the studies were not good enough for firm conclusions. The Cochrane cold-water review found no clear difference between cold and contrast or warm-water immersion.

Benefits, one by one

Each card is a research question, not a promise. Tap a goal to filter. Open a card to see the studies, doses and limits.

Cold-water immersion for muscle soreness after exercise

Low certainty

A Cochrane review of 17 small, low-quality trials found people who sat in cold water after exercise reported less muscle soreness over the next one to four days than people who rested. A newer comparison of ten recovery methods ranked hot packs and contrast water ahead for pain in the first 24 hours, and the authors say none of the evidence is strong.

3 studiesAs reported in the Cochrane review: water below 15 C; temperature, ti…

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Cochrane review (searches to 2011): 17 trials, 366 participants, using water below 15 C. Fourteen compared cold immersion with rest. A 2022 network meta-analysis of 59 trials (1,367 people) compared ten cold and heat methods. A 2015 Cochrane review of whole-body cryotherapy (extremely cold air chambers) found only four small trials.

Results

Soreness was lower with cold immersion than rest at 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours, with varied results between trials. There was no clear difference from contrast or warm-water immersion. Most trials did not check for harms. Whole-body cryotherapy: evidence rated very low quality; no firm conclusion.

Effect sizes as reported

Cochrane: soreness SMD -0.55 at 24 h, -0.66 at 48 h, -0.93 at 72 h, -0.58 at 96 h versus rest. Cryotherapy chamber: SMD -0.77 at 1 hour (20 participants).

Why this rating

Rated low because the trials were small, low quality and varied, most did not look for harms, and the newest big comparison says firm conclusions need better research. The effect looks real in the pooled numbers but it is soreness reported by the person, which is easy to influence.

Form and dose studied

As reported in the Cochrane review: water below 15 C; temperature, time and number of sessions varied widely between trials. No recommended amount is given here.

Who was studied

Mostly physically active young adults, many of them male; one trial type used runners. No trial evidence for older adults.

Limits

Self-reported pain; low-quality trials; the review is from 2012; harms were rarely tracked.

Why researchers looked

Cold-water plunges are popular with athletes, so reviewers asked whether they really ease the sore, stiff feeling that follows hard exercise.

Proposed mechanism Hypothesis

Cold may reduce swelling and the sensation of pain, but the reviews did not test how it works.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Cold water carries real risks for the heart and breathing, and most exercise trials did not report harms. See the Safety tab first: cold water can trigger cold shock, which affects the heart and breathing, and drowning risk is real.

4 7 19

Cold plunges after strength training: do they cost you muscle?

Mixed findings

A review of the research says that using cold-water immersion after every strength session may blunt gains in strength, power and muscle size over weeks, even while it helps people feel recovered sooner. Endurance training gains did not seem to be harmed.

1 studiesVaried; not stated in the abstract.

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Narrative review of studies of long-term post-exercise cold-water immersion with resistance and endurance training.

Results

The review concludes repeated cold immersion after resistance training can attenuate gains in strength, power and muscle growth, without clearly harming endurance gains.

Effect sizes as reported

No pooled effect size in the abstract.

Why this rating

Rated mixed because the review is narrative (not a systematic search), says the evidence on mechanisms is limited, and warns that methods differ a lot between studies.

Form and dose studied

Varied; not stated in the abstract.

Who was studied

Healthy people in training studies.

Limits

Narrative review; the methods of the studies it covers differ.

Why researchers looked

Athletes want faster recovery, but recovery is not the same as getting stronger, so researchers looked at what repeated cold immersion does to training results.

Proposed mechanism Hypothesis

The review says cold may dampen the signals that tell muscle to grow, but evidence for this is limited.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

The training effect is about results, not harm. See the Safety tab first: cold water can trigger cold shock, which affects the heart and breathing, and drowning risk is real.

18

Cold showers and sick days

Low certainty

In a Dutch trial of 3,018 adults, people who finished their daily shower with 30, 60 or 90 seconds of cold water took 29 percent fewer sick days from work than people who did not. The number of days they actually felt ill did not change.

2 studiesAs reported: a hot-to-cold shower with 30, 60 or 90 seconds of cold a…

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Randomised trial: 3,018 adults aged 18 to 65 were split into four groups (hot shower ending with 30, 60 or 90 seconds of cold, or usual showers) for 30 days, then 60 more days of cold showers at their own choice for the cold groups.

Results

Sickness absence from work was 29 percent lower with the cold-shower routine. Days of illness showed no clear difference. No serious related adverse events were reported.

Effect sizes as reported

Sickness absence incidence rate ratio 0.71 (P = 0.003); illness days not significant.

Why this rating

Rated low because it is one trial, the main result (illness days) was not different, and the absence result relies on self-report; people could not be blinded to a cold shower.

Form and dose studied

As reported: a hot-to-cold shower with 30, 60 or 90 seconds of cold at the end, daily for 30 days.

Who was studied

Adults 18 to 65 without severe illness and without a cold-shower habit, in the Netherlands.

Limits

Self-reported absence; 79 percent of the cold groups completed the 30 days; not tested in people with heart or circulation problems.

Why researchers looked

Cold showers are said to toughen the body against colds, so researchers tested whether a simple daily habit would change illness or work absence.

Proposed mechanism Hypothesis

Not tested in this trial; the authors do not prove why absence changed.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

No serious related events in the trial, which excluded people with severe illness. People with heart disease, high blood pressure or Raynaud's should ask a clinician first.

5 6

Cold-water immersion for stress, mood, sleep and inflammation

Mixed findings

A 2025 review of 11 trials (3,177 people) found stress was lower 12 hours after cold immersion, sleep quality and quality of life improved, but mood did not, and markers of inflammation actually rose right after the dip. The authors say the evidence is thin.

1 studiesWater 7 to 15 C and 30 seconds to 2 hours, as reported across trials.

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 randomised trials in healthy adults using water 15 C or colder for at least 30 seconds (baths in 10, a shower in 1).

Results

Inflammation measures rose immediately and at 1 hour. Stress was lower at 12 hours but not at other times. Sleep quality and quality of life improved; mood did not. No clear immune effect at 0 or 1 hour.

Effect sizes as reported

Inflammation SMD 1.03 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.68) immediately and 1.26 (0.59 to 1.94) at 1 hour; stress SMD -1.00 (-1.40 to -0.61) at 12 hours.

Why this rating

Rated mixed because some outcomes improved, some did not, inflammation went up, and the authors cite few trials, small samples and little diversity.

Form and dose studied

Water 7 to 15 C and 30 seconds to 2 hours, as reported across trials.

Who was studied

Healthy adults.

Limits

Few trials; pre-versus-post comparisons; healthy people only; different temperatures and times mixed together.

Why researchers looked

Cold plunging is widely promoted for mood, energy and calm, so reviewers pooled the randomised trials in healthy adults.

Proposed mechanism Hypothesis

Cold is a physical stress; the review describes a short-term inflammatory response but does not test why stress or sleep might improve.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

See the Safety tab first: cold water can trigger cold shock, which affects the heart and breathing, and drowning risk is real.

6

Regular cold plungers and colds: a survey

Very low certainty

In an online survey, 732 regular cold-water plungers reported better mental health and shorter colds and sick leave than 501 non-plungers. Benefits seemed greatest at about twice a week, and results got worse beyond that. Because it is a survey, it cannot show the plunges caused the difference.

1 studiesSelf-reported frequency of plunging per week.

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Cross-sectional online survey (June 2022), 1,233 people, self-reported general health questionnaire and days of upper respiratory infection and sick leave.

Results

Plungers reported better mental health, shorter respiratory infections and shorter sick leave. The pattern had an inverted-U shape: better up to about twice a week, then worse.

Effect sizes as reported

Small effect sizes of about -0.14 to -0.16 up to twice a week.

Why this rating

Rated very low because it is a self-reported survey at one point in time; people who already feel well and healthy may be more likely to plunge.

Form and dose studied

Self-reported frequency of plunging per week.

Who was studied

Adults who identified as regular cold plungers, and controls.

Limits

Cross-sectional; self-reported; cannot show cause.

Why researchers looked

Cold-water swimmers often say they catch fewer colds, so researchers compared them with non-swimmers.

Proposed mechanism Hypothesis

Not tested.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

See the Safety tab first: cold water can trigger cold shock, which affects the heart and breathing, and drowning risk is real.

8

Whole-body hyperthermia (heat in a clinic) for depression

Low certainty

In one small, careful trial, 30 adults with major depression who had a single clinical session of whole-body heating felt less depressed than those who had a sham session, for up to six weeks. A review of seven small studies agrees the idea is promising but says there is not enough evidence to recommend it. This was medically supervised, not a home sauna.

2 studiesA single supervised session in the trial; the review notes target tem…

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Randomised double-blind trial (34 randomised, 30 treated, 29 analysed), single session versus sham, 6 weeks of follow-up, plus a 2019 review of 7 studies (148 people; hot baths and infrared heating).

Results

Depression scores were lower after real heating than sham at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6, and side effects were generally mild. The review found large improvements in most outcomes but small studies and several without control groups.

Effect sizes as reported

Difference from sham on the Hamilton scale: -6.53 at week 1 (95% CI -9.90 to -3.16) and -4.27 at week 6 (-7.94 to -0.61).

Why this rating

Rated low because the one controlled trial is very small, blinding was imperfect (most people guessed their group), and the review says it cannot yet support recommendations.

Form and dose studied

A single supervised session in the trial; the review notes target temperatures of 38 to 39 C gave larger effects. No home protocol is given here.

Who was studied

Adults aged 18 to 65 with major depression, medically healthy, not on psychiatric medicine.

Limits

Very small; one centre; uncontrolled studies in the review; not a test of saunas used at home.

Why researchers looked

Researchers noticed that warming the body might lift mood, and asked whether deliberate heating works better than a fake treatment.

Proposed mechanism Hypothesis

Proposed: heating affects the body's stress and mood pathways. The trial did not show how.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Heat treatment for depression should only be done in a supervised clinical setting. Depression needs proper care: see the Safety tab.

10 9

Frequent sauna bathing and heart disease and death (Finnish men)

Low certainty

In a study of 2,315 middle-aged Finnish men followed for about 21 years, those who used a sauna 4 to 7 times a week had about a third of the sudden-cardiac-death risk of those who used it once a week, and lower overall death rates. This is an observational link: it does not prove that saunas protect the heart.

3 studiesAs reported in the study: frequency from once to 7 times a week; sess…

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Prospective cohort study (Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study): 2,315 men aged 42 to 60, median 20.7 years of follow-up, with reviews summarising the field.

Results

More frequent sauna bathing went with fewer deaths. Sudden cardiac death was 10.1 percent in men bathing once a week, 7.8 percent at 2 to 3 times and 5.0 percent at 4 to 7 times. All-cause death was 49.1, 37.8 and 30.8 percent. Sessions longer than 19 minutes also went with lower sudden-death risk.

Effect sizes as reported

Sudden cardiac death HR 0.78 (0.57 to 1.07) for 2 to 3 sessions a week and 0.37 (0.18 to 0.75) for 4 to 7, versus once a week; sessions over 19 minutes HR 0.48 (0.31 to 0.75) versus under 11 minutes.

Why this rating

Rated low (not higher) because it is observational, all participants were men from one region, and healthier or fitter men may bathe more. Reviews call sauna a probable healthspan aid but rest on the same Finnish cohorts.

Form and dose studied

As reported in the study: frequency from once to 7 times a week; session length under 11 minutes to over 19 minutes. Not advice.

Who was studied

Apparently healthy middle-aged men from Eastern Finland in the 1980s.

Limits

Observational; one region; men only; self-reported; confounding possible. The effect of session length on all-cause death was not significant.

Why researchers looked

Sauna is part of daily life in Finland, so researchers could follow thousands of men and compare frequent users with occasional ones.

Proposed mechanism Hypothesis

Proposed: heat may improve blood-vessel function and lower blood pressure. These ideas come from reviews, not from this cohort.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Sauna carries its own risks, including low blood pressure, overheating and alcohol-related deaths. See the Safety tab.

13 17 15

Frequent sauna bathing and dementia

Very low certainty

In the same Finnish group of men, those who used a sauna 4 to 7 times a week were diagnosed with dementia and Alzheimer's disease about a third as often as those who used it once a week. Again this shows a link, not a cause.

1 studiesFrequency of sauna bathing as reported by the men.

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Prospective cohort of 2,315 men followed a median 20.7 years; 204 dementia and 123 Alzheimer's cases.

Results

Compared with one session a week, dementia risk was lower at 4 to 7 sessions a week. Two to three sessions a week was not clearly different.

Effect sizes as reported

Dementia HR 0.34 (0.16 to 0.71); Alzheimer's HR 0.35 (0.14 to 0.90) for 4 to 7 versus 1 session a week.

Why this rating

Rated very low because it is a single observational cohort of men from one region and the 2 to 3 sessions result was not clearly different from one session.

Form and dose studied

Frequency of sauna bathing as reported by the men.

Who was studied

Middle-aged Finnish men.

Limits

Observational; men only; cannot show cause; the author group also wrote the other Finnish reports.

Why researchers looked

If heat helps the blood vessels, researchers asked whether it might also protect the brain.

Proposed mechanism Hypothesis

Not tested.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

See the Safety tab for who should avoid saunas.

14

Sauna and blood pressure

Low certainty

In the Finnish cohort, men who used a sauna 4 to 7 times a week developed high blood pressure about half as often as those who used it once a week. A 2026 review found blood pressure falls for a while after heat treatments, but whether regular use lowers blood pressure for good is unproven.

2 studiesFrequency of sessions as reported; the review mixed many temperatures…

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Cohort of 1,621 men without high blood pressure (24.7 years of follow-up, 251 cases) and a narrative review of 21 human studies of saunas, hot springs, hot-water immersion and mud packs.

Results

Cohort: fewer new cases at 4 to 7 sessions a week; 2 to 3 sessions not clearly different. Review: systolic pressure fell by about 11 to 27 mmHg within 24 hours, but most studies had no control group and long-term benefit is unproven.

Effect sizes as reported

Hypertension HR 0.54 (0.32 to 0.91) for 4 to 7 sessions versus once a week; acute systolic fall about 11 to 27 mmHg.

Why this rating

Rated low because the cohort is observational and the acute drops are temporary; the review says long-term benefit is unproven and safety in frail older adults and beta-blocker users is not defined.

Form and dose studied

Frequency of sessions as reported; the review mixed many temperatures and times.

Who was studied

Finnish men for the cohort; adults aged 18 to 94 in the review.

Limits

Observational; most acute studies had no control group.

Why researchers looked

Heat widens blood vessels and blood pressure drops while you are in a sauna, so researchers asked whether that adds up to long-term benefit.

Proposed mechanism Hypothesis

Proposed: heat widens blood vessels and relaxes arteries (from review background).

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

A fall in blood pressure can cause dizziness or fainting, especially when standing up. People on blood pressure medicines, including beta-blockers, should ask a clinician first.

21 20

Contrast water therapy and heat for muscle soreness

Very low certainty

A network meta-analysis of 59 trials (1,367 people) ranked hot packs first and contrast water therapy second for easing soreness in the first 24 hours after exercise. The authors say the studies were not good enough for firm conclusions. The Cochrane cold-water review found no clear difference between cold and contrast or warm-water immersion.

2 studiesVaried between trials.

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Network meta-analysis of 59 randomised trials in people with delayed-onset muscle soreness; Cochrane review of cold-water immersion (5 trials compared with contrast, 4 with warm water).

Results

Within 24 hours hot packs ranked best, then contrast water therapy. Cochrane found no clear difference in pain between cold and contrast immersion or cold and warm water.

Effect sizes as reported

Rankings only; Cochrane pooled comparisons showed no clear difference.

Why this rating

Rated very low because the evidence compares rankings of many small low-quality trials and gives no clear winner.

Form and dose studied

Varied between trials.

Who was studied

People with exercise-related soreness.

Limits

Low trial quality; rankings are not proof.

Why researchers looked

Contrast therapy swaps hot and cold water on the idea that it pumps away soreness, so reviewers compared it with other recovery methods.

Proposed mechanism Hypothesis

Not tested in the studies read.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Alternating hot and cold water combines the risks of both. See the Safety tab.

19 4

Connections to the rest of health

How Cold and Heat Exposure: Cold Plunges, Saunas and Biohacking Claims connects to the rest of our health knowledge graph. Every link says what kind of connection it is. A safety link (for example to the liver) is a warning, not a benefit. A study that merely mentions a topic never creates a benefit link.

Explore every connection: goals, body systems, organs, symptoms, genes

A. Wellness goals

Connected toKind of connectionEvidence statusContextStudies
Joint Support Low certainty Cold-water immersion for muscle soreness after exercise: A Cochrane review of 17 small, low-quality trials found people who sat in cold water after exercise reported less muscle soreness over the next one to four days than people who rested. A newer comparison of ten recovery methods ranked hot packs and contrast water ahead for pain in the first 24 hours, and the authors say none of the evidence is strong. Contrast water therapy and heat for muscle soreness: A network meta-analysis of 59 trials (1,367 people) ranked hot packs first and contrast water therapy second for easing soreness in the first 24 hours after exercise. The authors say the studies were not good enough for firm conclusions. The Cochrane cold-water review found no clear difference between cold and contrast or warm-water immersion. 4 7 19
Pain Relief Low certainty Cold-water immersion for muscle soreness after exercise: A Cochrane review of 17 small, low-quality trials found people who sat in cold water after exercise reported less muscle soreness over the next one to four days than people who rested. A newer comparison of ten recovery methods ranked hot packs and contrast water ahead for pain in the first 24 hours, and the authors say none of the evidence is strong. Contrast water therapy and heat for muscle soreness: A network meta-analysis of 59 trials (1,367 people) ranked hot packs first and contrast water therapy second for easing soreness in the first 24 hours after exercise. The authors say the studies were not good enough for firm conclusions. The Cochrane cold-water review found no clear difference between cold and contrast or warm-water immersion. 4 7 19
Preventive Wellness Mixed findings Cold plunges after strength training: do they cost you muscle?: A review of the research says that using cold-water immersion after every strength session may blunt gains in strength, power and muscle size over weeks, even while it helps people feel recovered sooner. Endurance training gains did not seem to be harmed. 18
Immune Support Low certainty Cold showers and sick days: In a Dutch trial of 3,018 adults, people who finished their daily shower with 30, 60 or 90 seconds of cold water took 29 percent fewer sick days from work than people who did not. The number of days they actually felt ill did not change. 5 6
Preventive Wellness Low certainty Cold showers and sick days: In a Dutch trial of 3,018 adults, people who finished their daily shower with 30, 60 or 90 seconds of cold water took 29 percent fewer sick days from work than people who did not. The number of days they actually felt ill did not change. 5 6
Stress Reduction Mixed findings Cold-water immersion for stress, mood, sleep and inflammation: A 2025 review of 11 trials (3,177 people) found stress was lower 12 hours after cold immersion, sleep quality and quality of life improved, but mood did not, and markers of inflammation actually rose right after the dip. The authors say the evidence is thin. 6
Better Sleep Mixed findings Cold-water immersion for stress, mood, sleep and inflammation: A 2025 review of 11 trials (3,177 people) found stress was lower 12 hours after cold immersion, sleep quality and quality of life improved, but mood did not, and markers of inflammation actually rose right after the dip. The authors say the evidence is thin. 6
Mood Balance Mixed findings Cold-water immersion for stress, mood, sleep and inflammation: A 2025 review of 11 trials (3,177 people) found stress was lower 12 hours after cold immersion, sleep quality and quality of life improved, but mood did not, and markers of inflammation actually rose right after the dip. The authors say the evidence is thin. 6
Immune Support Very low certainty Regular cold plungers and colds: a survey: In an online survey, 732 regular cold-water plungers reported better mental health and shorter colds and sick leave than 501 non-plungers. Benefits seemed greatest at about twice a week, and results got worse beyond that. Because it is a survey, it cannot show the plunges caused the difference. 8
Mood Balance Very low certainty Regular cold plungers and colds: a survey: In an online survey, 732 regular cold-water plungers reported better mental health and shorter colds and sick leave than 501 non-plungers. Benefits seemed greatest at about twice a week, and results got worse beyond that. Because it is a survey, it cannot show the plunges caused the difference. 8
Mood Balance Low certainty Whole-body hyperthermia (heat in a clinic) for depression: In one small, careful trial, 30 adults with major depression who had a single clinical session of whole-body heating felt less depressed than those who had a sham session, for up to six weeks. A review of seven small studies agrees the idea is promising but says there is not enough evidence to recommend it. This was medically supervised, not a home sauna. 10 9
Anxiety Support Low certainty Whole-body hyperthermia (heat in a clinic) for depression: In one small, careful trial, 30 adults with major depression who had a single clinical session of whole-body heating felt less depressed than those who had a sham session, for up to six weeks. A review of seven small studies agrees the idea is promising but says there is not enough evidence to recommend it. This was medically supervised, not a home sauna. 10 9
Heart Health Low certainty Frequent sauna bathing and heart disease and death (Finnish men): In a study of 2,315 middle-aged Finnish men followed for about 21 years, those who used a sauna 4 to 7 times a week had about a third of the sudden-cardiac-death risk of those who used it once a week, and lower overall death rates. This is an observational link: it does not prove that saunas protect the heart. Sauna and blood pressure: In the Finnish cohort, men who used a sauna 4 to 7 times a week developed high blood pressure about half as often as those who used it once a week. A 2026 review found blood pressure falls for a while after heat treatments, but whether regular use lowers blood pressure for good is unproven. 13 17 15 21 20
Healthy Aging Low certainty Frequent sauna bathing and heart disease and death (Finnish men): In a study of 2,315 middle-aged Finnish men followed for about 21 years, those who used a sauna 4 to 7 times a week had about a third of the sudden-cardiac-death risk of those who used it once a week, and lower overall death rates. This is an observational link: it does not prove that saunas protect the heart. Frequent sauna bathing and dementia: In the same Finnish group of men, those who used a sauna 4 to 7 times a week were diagnosed with dementia and Alzheimer's disease about a third as often as those who used it once a week. Again this shows a link, not a cause. 13 17 15 14
Brain Health Very low certainty Frequent sauna bathing and dementia: In the same Finnish group of men, those who used a sauna 4 to 7 times a week were diagnosed with dementia and Alzheimer's disease about a third as often as those who used it once a week. Again this shows a link, not a cause. 14
Blood Pressure Support Low certainty Sauna and blood pressure: In the Finnish cohort, men who used a sauna 4 to 7 times a week developed high blood pressure about half as often as those who used it once a week. A 2026 review found blood pressure falls for a while after heat treatments, but whether regular use lowers blood pressure for good is unproven. 21 20

B. Body systems

Connected toKind of connectionEvidence statusContextStudies
Musculoskeletal System Biological association Low certainty Studied for: Cold-water immersion for muscle soreness after exercise Studied for: Cold plunges after strength training: do they cost you muscle? 4 7 19 18
Immune System Biological association Low certainty Studied for: Cold showers and sick days Studied for: Regular cold plungers and colds: a survey 5 6 8
Stress Mood Biological association Mixed findings Studied for: Cold-water immersion for stress, mood, sleep and inflammation Studied for: Whole-body hyperthermia (heat in a clinic) for depression 6 10 9
Nervous System Biological association Mixed findings Studied for: Cold-water immersion for stress, mood, sleep and inflammation Studied for: Whole-body hyperthermia (heat in a clinic) for depression 6 10 9 14
Cardiovascular System Biological association Low certainty Studied for: Frequent sauna bathing and heart disease and death (Finnish men) Studied for: Sauna and blood pressure 13 17 15 21 20

E. Health conditions

Connected toKind of connectionEvidence statusContextStudies
Healthy aging Observational evidence Finnish cohort studies link frequent sauna use with lower mortality; not proof of cause. Frequent sauna use is linked with lower mortality in Finnish men; cause is not shown.
Preparation or compound: Sauna bathing
13 14

I. Biomarkers

Connected toKind of connectionEvidence statusContextStudies
Inflammation markers after cold-water immersion Biological association Low certainty Measured in trials: rose immediately after cold immersion in the pooled trials. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 6
Blood pressure after heat exposure Biological association Low certainty Measured in trials: lower for hours after heat exposure; long-term effect unproven. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 20 21

L. Active compounds

Connected toKind of connectionEvidence statusContextStudies
Cold-water immersion Biological association Human Studied for soreness, mood, stress, sleep, immunity and training adaptations. 4 6
Cold shower Biological association Human Studied for sick days. 5
Finnish sauna Biological association Human (observational) Observed in Finnish cohorts for heart disease, blood pressure and dementia. 17 13
Contrast water therapy Biological association Human Studied for muscle soreness. 19
Whole-body hyperthermia Biological association Human Studied for depression. 10 9
Whole-body cryotherapy Biological association Human Studied for muscle soreness; evidence very low quality. 7

Each connection is stored with the ingredient, the connected record, the kind of connection, the evidence status, the supporting studies, the preparation or compound involved, and a review date (last reviewed October 31, 2026).

The evidence

The research centre for Cold and Heat Exposure: Cold Plunges, Saunas and Biohacking Claims. Every record here was checked against PubMed or the publisher's page; we never list a study we have not verified.

Evidence by outcome

Bars show how many studies we found for each outcome, not how well it works. People are added up across trials only (reviews are not added, to avoid double counting).

How we rate evidence

High certainty

Several well-run trials or reviews agree; further research is unlikely to change the picture much.

Moderate certainty

Good trials point the same way, but some doubt remains.

Low certainty

Small, short or inconsistent trials. The finding could change with better research.

Very low certainty

Very little or very weak human data. Treat as a possibility only.

Mixed findings

Trials or reviews disagree with each other.

Not enough evidence

Not enough human research to say either way.

Evidence against

Good research found no benefit, or found harm.

We take the reviewers' own risk-of-bias and GRADE statements where they exist, and otherwise judge from study size, design, consistency, directness and whether a product matches what is sold. Many publications do not make evidence high. Method note: We searched PubMed, re-read the abstract of every review, trial and cohort study cited, and read the EMAS and NHS Raynaud's pages in full. Full texts of papers were not read. Temperatures and times appear only as reported in studies.

Study library: every study we checked 23
StudyDesignPeopleProduct, dose, lengthResult
Barwood 2018
Acute Anxiety Predicts Components of the Cold Shock Response on Cold Water Immersion: Toward an Integrated Psychophysiological Model of Acute Cold Water Survival.
Front Psychol · PMID 29695988 · DOI
Experimental laboratory
48
48 volunteers new to cold water; 25 also completed repeated immersions
Cold-water immersion at 15 C
7 minutes per immersion 1 to 6 immersions · vs Immersion without added anxiety
Higher anxiety before immersion predicted a larger heart-rate response. Even after volunteers had become used to the cold, raised anxiety brought back parts of the shock response.
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Heart rate, breathing and anxiety ratings in the first minute

Limitations: Small laboratory study.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Barwood 2024
Habituation of the cold shock response: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Therm Biol · PMID 38211547 · DOI
Systematic review meta analysis
145
17 groups of volunteers in laboratory cold-water immersion studies
Repeated cold-water immersion
Same cold stimulus repeated About 4 immersions needed for the response to shrink (review's wording) · vs First versus later immersions
The gasp-and-breathe-fast response and the heart-rate surge got smaller with repeated immersions. The authors suggest this could reduce drowning risk but note variation between studies.
Heart rate change -14 beats per minute (d -1.19); breathing rate -8 per minute (d -0.78)
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Heart rate, breathing rate, minute ventilation, tidal volume

Limitations: Laboratory studies; shows the reflex shrinks, not that open-water drowning falls; variation between studies was large.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Bierens 2016
Physiology Of Drowning: A Review.
Physiology (Bethesda) · PMID 26889019 · DOI
Narrative review
Review of drowning physiology Immersion and submersion
Drowning starts with immersion responses (cold shock, loss of muscle function, fluid shifts) that lead to collapse and submersion. The authors name hot-water immersion and cold shock as areas where understanding is limited.
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Mechanisms of drowning

Limitations: Narrative review.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Bleakley 2012
Cold-water immersion (cryotherapy) for preventing and treating muscle soreness after exercise.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev · PMID 22336838 · DOI
Systematic review meta analysis
366
17 small randomised or quasi-randomised trials of cold-water immersion after exercise; study quality low
Cold-water immersion (water below 15 C)
Temperature, duration and frequency varied between trials Varied · vs Rest or no intervention (14 trials); contrast immersion (5); warm-water immersion (4)
Compared with rest, cold-water immersion lowered muscle soreness at 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours; results were varied between trials. No clear difference against contrast or warm-water immersion. Most trials did not actively look for harms.
Soreness SMD -0.55 (24 h), -0.66 (48 h), -0.93 (72 h), -0.58 (96 h) (24 h -0.84 to -0.27; 48 h -0.97 to -0.35; 72 h -1.36 to -0.51; 96 h -1.00 to -0.16)
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Muscle soreness, tenderness, subjective recovery, adverse events

Limitations: Small, low-quality, varied trials; most did not track predefined adverse events; searches ended 2011; the authors call for better research.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement. Cochrane review.

Read: abstract

Buijze 2016
The Effect of Cold Showering on Health and Work: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
PLoS One · PMID 27631616 · DOI
Randomised controlled trial
3018
Adults aged 18 to 65 in the Netherlands without severe illness and no routine cold-shower habit
Routine (hot-to-) cold shower
Cold phase of 30, 60 or 90 seconds at the end of a shower 30 consecutive days, then 60 days of cold showering at own discretion · vs Usual showering
Sickness absence from work was 29 percent lower with the cold-shower routine. Days of illness did not differ. No serious adverse events related to the showers were reported.
Sickness absence incidence rate ratio 0.71 (P = 0.003); illness days not significant
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Illness days and related sickness absence from work (primary); quality of life, work productivity, anxiety, thermal sensation, adverse reactions

Limitations: Sickness absence was self-reported; participants could not be blinded; 79 percent of the cold-shower groups completed the 30-day protocol; results do not cover people with serious illness.

Funding and conflicts: Registered in the Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR5183). The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Cain 2025
Effects of cold-water immersion on health and wellbeing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS One · PMID 39879231 · DOI
Systematic review meta analysis
3177
11 randomised trials in healthy adults (mostly moderate to high quality on the PEDro scale)
Cold-water immersion by bath (10 studies) or shower (1 study)
Water 7 to 15 C; 30 seconds to 2 hours (as reported) Acute and longer-term · vs Pre- versus post-exposure outcomes
Inflammation measures rose right after immersion. Stress was lower 12 hours later but not at other times. No clear immune effect at 0 or 1 hour; a narrative look at longer-term trials noted the 29 percent drop in sickness absence in cold-shower users. Sleep quality and quality of life improved; mood did not.
Inflammation SMD 1.03 (immediately) and 1.26 (1 hour); stress SMD -1.00 at 12 hours (Inflammation 0.37 to 1.68 and 0.59 to 1.94; stress -1.40 to -0.61)
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Sleep, stress, fatigue, immunity, inflammation, mood, depression, anxiety

Limitations: Few randomised trials, small samples and limited diversity; the authors call for longer high-quality trials. Pre/post comparisons used for the pooled results.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Costello 2015
Whole-body cryotherapy (extreme cold air exposure) for preventing and treating muscle soreness after exercise in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev · PMID 26383887 · DOI
Systematic review meta analysis
64
4 laboratory trials in physically active, mostly young men (mean age 23)
Whole-body cryotherapy: extremely cold dry air (below -100 C) in a chamber
2 to 4 minutes per exposure (as described by the review) Varied · vs Rest or no cryotherapy; far-infrared therapy (1 trial)
Evidence was rated very low quality. Self-reported soreness was lower at 1 hour after cryotherapy, but the ranges around later results included no difference. No trial looked for harms. The authors concluded there was not enough evidence to say whether it works.
Soreness SMD -0.77 at 1 h (20 participants) (-1.42 to -0.12)
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Muscle soreness, subjective recovery, adverse effects

Limitations: Four small trials with high risk of bias; no data on women or elite athletes; no active surveillance of harms.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement. Cochrane review.

Read: abstract

Czarnecki 2025
Inverted "u-shaped" association of cold-water immersion frequency with mental health and upper respiratory tract infection: a cross-sectional study.
Brain Behav Immun Health · PMID 41127868 · DOI
Cross sectional
1233
732 'polar plungers' and 501 controls in an online self-report survey (June 2022)
Regular cold-water immersion (self-reported frequency)
Frequency per week as self-reported Survey · vs People who did not plunge
Plungers reported better mental health and shorter infections and sick leave. Up to about twice a week, more plunging went with better scores; beyond that, results got worse again (an inverted U-shape).
Effect sizes about -0.16 (mental health index), -0.14 (infection length), -0.15 (sick leave)
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: General mental health questionnaire (GHQ-28), days of upper respiratory infection, sick-leave days

Limitations: Cross-sectional and self-reported: it cannot show that plunging caused the differences, and people who feel well may be more likely to plunge.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Hanusch 2019
The impact of whole-body hyperthermia interventions on mood and depression - are we ready for recommendations for clinical application?
Int J Hyperthermia · PMID 31159624 · DOI
Systematic review
148
7 clinical studies (3 hot baths, 4 infrared heating), mean age 46
Whole-body hyperthermia
Target temperatures of 38 to 39 C gave larger effects (as reported); average treatment time about 66 minutes 1 to 6 weeks · vs Mostly none (3 of 7 studies had no control group)
Most outcome measures showed large improvements, but the studies were small and often lacked a control group. The authors call it promising with low risk of side effects but say there is not enough evidence for general recommendations.
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Mood and depression scores

Limitations: Small, mostly uncontrolled studies; reviewers include the lead author of the controlled trial.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Janssen 2016
Whole-Body Hyperthermia for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Psychiatry · PMID 27172277 · DOI
Randomised controlled trial
30
Medically healthy adults aged 18 to 65 with major depression, not on psychiatric medicine; 34 randomised, 30 treated, 29 analysed
Single session of whole-body hyperthermia (supervised, medical setting)
One session 6 weeks of follow-up · vs Sham session matched in length without intense heat
Depression scores fell more after real hyperthermia than sham for the full 6 weeks. Adverse events were generally mild. Most participants guessed which group they were in, so the blinding was imperfect.
Difference in score vs sham: -6.53 (week 1), -6.35 (week 2), -4.50 (week 4), -4.27 (week 6) (-9.90 to -3.16; -9.95 to -2.74; -8.17 to -0.84; -7.94 to -0.61)
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores

Limitations: Very small trial; single session in a clinic; blinding imperfect (94 percent of the active group and 71 percent of the sham group thought they had real treatment); not a home sauna study.

Funding and conflicts: Registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT01625546. The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Kenttamies 2008
Death in sauna.
J Forensic Sci · PMID 18471223 · DOI
Case series
Deaths that occurred in a sauna in Finland, 1990 to 2002, from police, autopsy and toxicology reports Sauna
1990 to 2002
Death in a sauna is rare, under 2 per 100,000 people a year even in Finland. About half (51 percent) were natural deaths, heat was the cause in 25 percent, and 50 percent of people had alcohol in their system. The authors advise less drinking and not leaving a drunk bather alone in the sauna.
Under 2 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants per year; alcohol in 50 percent
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Causes of death and alcohol

Limitations: Older Finnish data; counts deaths only, not all harm.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Kumar 2019
A literature review of immersion pulmonary edema.
Phys Sportsmed · PMID 30403902 · DOI
Systematic review
121 articles, including 54 case reports, on fluid in the lungs during swimming and diving Water immersion, often cold, with exercise
Varied
Incidence is estimated at about 1.1 to 1.8 percent. Risk factors include age over 50, cold water, tight wetsuits and heart disease, but it also happens in healthy people. It can come back and can be fatal; people who had it should have heart and lung checks and avoid cold water.
Incidence about 1.1 to 1.8 percent
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Incidence, risk factors, management

Limitations: Mostly case reports and small studies.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Laukkanen 2015
Association between sauna bathing and fatal cardiovascular and all-cause mortality events.
JAMA Intern Med · PMID 25705824 · DOI
Prospective cohort
2315
Men aged 42 to 60 from Eastern Finland (Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study), followed a median 20.7 years
Finnish sauna bathing (self-reported frequency and length of sessions)
1, 2 to 3, or 4 to 7 sessions per week; session length under 11, 11 to 19, over 19 minutes (as reported) Median 20.7 years · vs 1 session per week
More frequent sauna bathing went with fewer deaths. Sudden cardiac death: 10.1 percent of men with 1 session a week, 7.8 percent with 2 to 3, 5.0 percent with 4 to 7. All-cause death: 49.1, 37.8 and 30.8 percent. Longer sessions also went with lower sudden cardiac death risk.
Sudden cardiac death HR 0.78 (2 to 3 sessions) and 0.37 (4 to 7 sessions) versus 1 session a week; sessions over 19 minutes HR 0.48 versus under 11 minutes (0.57 to 1.07; 0.18 to 0.75; 0.31 to 0.75)
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Sudden cardiac death, fatal coronary heart disease, fatal cardiovascular disease, all-cause death

Limitations: Observational: men chose how often to bathe, all were Finnish men from one region, so healthy habits or fitness may explain part of the link; results do not prove saunas cause lower risk.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Laukkanen 2017
Sauna bathing is inversely associated with dementia and Alzheimer's disease in middle-aged Finnish men.
Age Ageing · PMID 27932366 · DOI
Prospective cohort
2315
Same Finnish cohort of men aged 42 to 60, median follow-up 20.7 years
Finnish sauna bathing (self-reported frequency)
1, 2 to 3, or 4 to 7 sessions per week Median 20.7 years · vs 1 session per week
Men who bathed in a sauna 4 to 7 times a week had lower rates of dementia (204 cases overall) and Alzheimer's disease (123 cases overall) than men with one session a week.
Dementia HR 0.34 (4 to 7 sessions) and 0.78 (2 to 3); Alzheimer's HR 0.35 and 0.80 (0.16 to 0.71; 0.57 to 1.06; 0.14 to 0.90; 0.53 to 1.20)
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Diagnosed dementia and Alzheimer's disease

Limitations: Observational, men only, one region; the 2 to 3 sessions result was not clearly different from 1 session; cannot show cause.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Laukkanen 2018
Cardiovascular and Other Health Benefits of Sauna Bathing: A Review of the Evidence.
Mayo Clin Proc · PMID 30077204 · DOI
Narrative review
Review of observational studies, randomised and non-randomised trials of Finnish sauna Finnish sauna bathing
Varied Varied
The review says sauna bathing has been linked to lower risk of high blood pressure, cardiovascular disease and dementia and discusses possible mechanisms such as better blood-vessel function. It also notes uncertainty and calls for more research.
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, brain disease, lung disease, death

Limitations: Narrative review; written by the Finnish cohort's own investigators.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Leuci 2026
Beyond hypothermia: mechanisms of death, rescue, and prevention in cold water immersion.
J Appl Physiol (1985) · PMID 42532024 · DOI
Narrative review
Review of epidemiology and physiology of cold water immersion deaths Cold water immersion
Seconds to sustained immersion
The review says many open-water cold deaths come from responses in the first minutes (cold shock, swimming failure) before the body core has cooled much. Cold shock can cause death through breathing in water, reduced blood flow to the brain from over-breathing, and abnormal heart rhythm. It also discusses alcohol and drug effects and collapse on rescue.
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Mechanisms of death in cold water, rescue, prevention

Limitations: Narrative review; written for clinicians and rescue services.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Patrick 2021
Sauna use as a lifestyle practice to extend healthspan.
Exp Gerontol · PMID 34363927 · DOI
Narrative review
Review of sauna research Sauna use
Typical sauna temperatures described as 45 to 100 C (113 to 212 F), depending on type Varied
The review calls sauna bathing a probable means of extending healthspan based on observational, interventional and mechanistic data, and describes the body's heat-stress response. It rests heavily on the Finnish cohort studies.
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Healthspan, physiology of heat stress

Limitations: Narrative review by authors who favour the idea; draws on the observational cohorts; the abstract does not give a funding statement.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Petersen 2021
Post-exercise Cold Water Immersion Effects on Physiological Adaptations to Resistance Training and the Underlying Mechanisms in Skeletal Muscle: A Narrative Review.
Front Sports Act Living · PMID 33898988 · DOI
Narrative review
Review of studies of cold-water immersion after resistance and endurance training Post-exercise cold-water immersion
Varied Short and long term · vs Training without cold immersion
The review says cold immersion can speed short-term recovery but, with repeated use, can blunt gains in strength, power and muscle growth after resistance training, without harming endurance training gains. Evidence for the mechanism is limited.
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Strength, power, muscle growth, anabolic signalling

Limitations: Narrative review (not a systematic search); the authors list method differences that make studies hard to compare.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Wang 2022
Effect of cold and heat therapies on pain relief in patients with delayed onset muscle soreness: A network meta-analysis.
J Rehabil Med · PMID 34636405 · DOI
Network meta analysis
1367
59 randomised studies of people with delayed-onset muscle soreness
Ten approaches including contrast water therapy, cold-water immersion, hot or warm water immersion, hot packs and cold packs
Varied Varied · vs Passive recovery
Within 24 hours after exercise hot packs ranked best for pain relief, followed by contrast water therapy. The authors stress the poor quality of the studies and say firm conclusions need better research.
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Pain relief at under 24 h, 48 h and over 48 h

Limitations: Rankings, not proof; study quality limited; approaches differ widely.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Yamasaki 2026
Acute blood pressure responses and safety considerations in heat therapy interventions: A narrative review.
Complement Ther Med · PMID 41794190 · DOI
Narrative review
21 human studies (2 randomised, 1 crossover, 7 non-randomised, 11 observational) of saunas, hot springs, hot-water immersion and mud packs; ages 18 to 94 Heat therapy: sauna, mineral hot-spring bathing, hot-water immersion, mud packs
Varied Acute (within 24 hours) · vs Mostly no control group
Systolic blood pressure fell by roughly 11 to 27 mmHg within 24 hours, consistently but temporarily. A few small studies suggested bigger drops in people taking beta-blockers. Serious events were rare, but few studies looked at people 65 or older or reported other illnesses and medicines.
Systolic reductions about 11 to 27 mmHg within 24 hours
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Blood pressure within 24 hours; safety in older adults and beta-blocker users

Limitations: Most studies had no control group and differed widely; long-term benefit unproven; safety in frail older adults and beta-blocker users not defined.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

Zaccardi 2017
Sauna Bathing and Incident Hypertension: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Am J Hypertens · PMID 28633297 · DOI
Prospective cohort
1621
Men aged 42 to 60 without high blood pressure at the start, Eastern Finland; median follow-up 24.7 years; 251 new cases
Finnish sauna bathing (self-reported frequency)
1, 2 to 3, or 4 to 7 sessions per week Median 24.7 years · vs 1 session per week
Fewer new cases of high blood pressure among men who bathed 4 to 7 times a week. The 2 to 3 sessions group was not clearly different.
HR 0.54 (4 to 7 sessions) and 0.76 (2 to 3) after basic adjustment; HR 0.53 and 0.83 after fuller adjustment (0.32 to 0.91; 0.57 to 1.02; 0.28 to 0.98; 0.59 to 1.18)
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: New high blood pressure (diagnosis, measured pressure over 140/90, or medicine)

Limitations: Observational, men only, one region; lifestyle differences may remain.

Funding and conflicts: The PubMed record read gives no funding or conflict-of-interest statement.

Read: abstract

s-emas-cold
East Midlands Ambulance Service (NHS): Thinking of swimming in open water? Don't risk it (published 17 July 2021)
· Source
Official guidance
n/a

Methods, limits and funding

Read: full-text

s-nhs-raynauds
NHS: Raynaud's (reviewed 20 July 2023)
· Source
Official guidance
n/a

Methods, limits and funding

Read: full-text

What we do not know yet

  • No trial read shows that cold plunges or saunas help with fat loss, longevity or a 'reset'.
  • Sauna evidence comes mostly from Finnish men; women, children, older adults and other regions are under-studied.
  • No source read gave safe temperatures or times, so none are advised.
  • Pregnancy, children, frostbite, burns, heat stroke and infrared saunas were not covered by a source read.
  • The only controlled depression trial of whole-body heating is very small.

How new research is added

New studies are found by a saved PubMed search and placed in a review queue before the page changes.

Lab markers

What changed in blood or saliva tests during trials. A changed number is not the same as feeling or being healthier, and we give no "normal ranges".

Other 2

●

Inflammation markers after cold-water immersion

Rose immediately after cold immersion in the pooled trials in trials

Blood tests that rise when the body is under physical stress or inflammation.

Low certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

To test the claim that cold plunges 'reduce inflammation'.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

A short-term rise in the hours after a dip does not show long-term harm or benefit. The data do not support the claim that cold plunges lower inflammation.

Safety implication

None reported in the abstract.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
6Inflammation markers rose immediately (SMD 1.03) and 1 hour after (SMD 1.26)11 randomised trials, healthy adults

6

●

Blood pressure after heat exposure

Lower for hours after heat exposure; long-term effect unproven in trials

The pressure of blood in the arteries, measured in mmHg; a clinical marker for heart and stroke risk.

Low certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

To see whether heat treatments change blood pressure.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

Short-term drops are consistent, but they are not proof of lasting benefit and they raise a fall and fainting risk.

Safety implication

A sudden fall in blood pressure can cause dizziness or fainting; beta-blocker users may see larger drops in small studies.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
20Systolic pressure fell by roughly 11 to 27 mmHg within 24 hours across heat therapies21 human studies, ages 18 to 94, mostly without control groups
21New high blood pressure was less common with 4 to 7 sauna sessions a week (HR 0.54)1,621 Finnish men

20 21

Safety

What studies and official sources say about side effects, medicines and who should check first. Each point shows what kind of evidence it comes from.

Main points to know 6
  • Cold shock can kill within minutes, even in fit people. The NHS ambulance service page says sudden cold water tightens skin blood vessels, raises blood pressure and makes the heart work harder, which can trigger a heart attack even in young, healthy people. It also causes an involuntary gasp and fast breathing, which makes breathing in water more likely, and drowning can happen within minutes. A 2026 review says many cold-water deaths come from these first-minutes responses (breathing in water, less blood to the brain from over-breathing, abnormal heart rhythm) before the body has cooled much. Health agency guidance and narrative review 22 16 3
  • Never go alone, never after alcohol. Reviews of cold-water deaths discuss alcohol and drugs as modifying factors, and the Finnish sauna-death study found alcohol in 50 percent of people who died in a sauna and advises not leaving a drunk bather alone. Cold plunges and saunas both reduce judgement and the ability to get out, so a second sober person should be nearby, and open water should not be used by people who are unsure of it. Narrative review and case series 16 11
  • Repeated dips shrink the reflex, but that is not a safety guarantee. A meta-analysis of 17 laboratory groups found the heart-rate surge and fast breathing shrank after repeated immersions (about 4 in the review's wording). Anxiety can bring parts of the shock response back even in people who are used to the cold. The reduction in lab responses has not been shown to prevent open-water drowning. Systematic review and laboratory study 2 1
  • Cold-water lung fluid (immersion pulmonary edema) can recur. A review of 121 articles estimates immersion pulmonary edema at about 1.1 to 1.8 percent of swimmers or divers, with cold water, age over 50 and heart disease among the risk factors. It can come back and can be fatal. People who have had it should have heart and lung checks and avoid cold water. Systematic review 12
  • Heat adds its own dangers: blood pressure drops, overheating, alcohol. A 2026 review found saunas and hot baths consistently lower blood pressure for hours, and safety is not well defined in frail older adults or people taking beta-blockers. In Finland, deaths in saunas are rare (under 2 per 100,000 people per year), with heat the cause in 25 percent and alcohol present in 50 percent. Heat illness and dehydration are not measured in the studies read for this page, so no safe time or temperature is stated. Narrative review and case series 20 11
  • Whole-body cold chambers and clinic heating are not home practices. Extremely cold air chambers were tested in only four small trials and none looked for harms. The depression-treatment trials used supervised single sessions in a medical setting. Systematic review and randomised trial 7 10
Side effects 7
EffectHow oftenSeverity and recoveryEvidence
Cold shock: gasping, fast breathing, racing heart, higher blood pressure
Anxiety can magnify the response.
In laboratory work the heart-rate change was about 14 beats per minute smaller after habituation.Can be life-threatening in open water
Passes within about a minute if you can stay afloat (per EMAS), but can end in drowning or heart attack
Health agency guidance and meta analysis 22 2
Drowning and cold-water death
Most deaths occur before deep cooling (hypothermia) happens.
Not given as a rate in the sources read.Fatal
Not reversible
Narrative review 16 3
Fluid in the lungs after cold swimming (immersion pulmonary edema)
Cough, coughing blood-tinged sputum and breathlessness after a swim are warning signs.
About 1.1 to 1.8 percent estimatedUsually settles in 24 to 48 hours; can be fatal and can recur
Usually recovers
Systematic review 12
Inflammation markers rise right after cold immersion
Contradicts the claim that a dip lowers inflammation.
SMD 1.03 immediately and 1.26 at 1 hourShort-term lab change; clinical meaning unclear
Not assessed
Meta analysis of randomised trials 6
Low blood pressure, dizziness or fainting after heat
Possibly larger in people on beta-blockers (small studies).
Systolic falls of about 11 to 27 mmHg within 24 hoursCan cause falls
Temporary
Narrative review 20
Death in a sauna
Half were natural deaths, 25 percent heat, 50 percent had alcohol present.
Under 2 per 100,000 people per year in FinlandFatal
Not reversible
Case series 11
Possible loss of strength and muscle gain if used after every strength session
Endurance gains did not appear affected.
Not givenNot a medical harm; a training cost
Not assessed
Narrative review 18
Liver

No source read links cold or heat exposure to liver problems.

How often. No case reports were searched.

Monitoring. No monitoring advice applies to a non-ingested practice.

This is a safety connection. It is not evidence that Cold and Heat Exposure: Cold Plunges, Saunas and Biohacking Claims supports liver health.

Medicines and supplements 2
WithWhy it mattersImportanceEvidenceWhat to do
Blood pressure medicines, especially beta-blockers
prescription
Both heat and some drugs lower blood pressure; the review does not explain the mechanism.Small studies in the 2026 review suggested larger blood pressure drops in beta-blocker users; safety margins are not defined.Narrative review Very low certainty 20Ask the doctor or pharmacist who manages your medicines before using saunas or hot baths. Do not stop any medicine.
Alcohol
substance
Alcohol is discussed as a factor in sauna and cold-water deaths; the abstracts do not explain how.Alcohol was present in half the sauna deaths in Finland; reviews of cold-water deaths address alcohol and drugs.Case series and narrative review Low certainty 11 16Do not use saunas, cold plunges or open water after drinking.
Who should check first 8
SituationAdviceEvidence
Heart disease, abnormal heart rhythm or chest painCold shock can trigger heart attacks and rhythm problems in the first minutes; sauna safety in heart disease is not settled. See a doctor before any cold plunge or sauna.Health agency guidance and narrative review 22 16 20
High or uncontrolled blood pressure, or taking blood pressure medicinesCold raises blood pressure and heart workload; heat lowers it and can cause fainting. Ask a clinician first.Health agency guidance and narrative review 22 20
Raynaud's phenomenon or poor circulation in the fingers and toesThe NHS lists cold as a trigger, so deliberate cold exposure may bring on attacks. The NHS advises keeping warm and avoiding sudden temperature changes, and lists reasons to see a GP.Health agency guidance 23
Previous immersion pulmonary edemaThe review says to have heart and lung checks and avoid cold water.Systematic review 12
Older adults and frail peopleThe 2026 review says safety margins for frail older adults are not defined; and age over 50 is a risk factor for cold-water lung fluid. Check with a clinician.Narrative review and systematic review 20 12
PregnancyNo source on cold plunges, saunas or hot baths in pregnancy was read for this page. As a general caution, ask your midwife or doctor before using heat or cold in pregnancy.General caution, not from a source read
Drinking alcohol, or being aloneDo not use saunas, cold plunges or open water after alcohol, and do not do it alone.Case series and narrative review 11 16
Depression or other mental health conditionsDo not replace treatment with heat or cold practices. The depression trials were supervised clinical sessions.Randomised trial and systematic review 10 9
Overdose, product quality and regulators

Summary. Neither cold nor heat exposure is a toxic substance, but both can injure through physical stress: cold shock, drowning, hypothermia and heart strain for cold; low blood pressure, overheating and dehydration for heat.

Animal. Not reviewed.

Human doses studied. Temperatures and times appear only inside the studies tables, as reported.

High dose or long term signals. The inverted-U survey result suggests more is not better, but it is self-reported. The Finnish sauna cohorts found the lowest risk at the highest frequency, which is observational.

Overdose response. The sources read do not describe a dose-response for harm. Frostbite, burns and heat stroke are not covered by a source read here.

BodyActionDate
East Midlands Ambulance Service (NHS) (United Kingdom)Publishes warnings about cold water shock and advice to float and wait for the first shock to pass if you unexpectedly end up in cold open water. source2021-07-17
When to get medical help
  • Chest pain, fainting, severe dizziness, confusion, a racing or irregular heartbeat, or trouble breathing during or after cold or heat: get out, stay with someone and call emergency services (999 in the UK, 911 in the US). General safety guidance, not from a single source read.
  • Coughing, coughing pink or bloody fluid, or breathlessness after cold swimming: seek urgent care (immersion pulmonary edema is described in the review).
  • If you unexpectedly end up in cold open water, the NHS ambulance service advises to wait about a minute for the shock to pass, float on your back with your face clear, and call for help.
  • Shivering that will not stop, slurred speech, clumsiness or confusion after cold: get warm, dry and seek help. General safety guidance, not from a source read.
  • Headache, nausea, cramps, very hot dry skin or confusion in heat: leave the heat, cool down and seek help. General safety guidance, not from a source read.

Stop using the product and contact a clinician or emergency service. In the US, Poison Control is 1-800-222-1222.

General information only, not medical advice. Ask a clinician or pharmacist before use, especially with medicines, in pregnancy or with a health condition. See the Natural Remedy Safety guide.

Frequently asked questions

Is a cold plunge safe for everyone?

No. Cold water can trigger cold shock, which strains the heart and breathing. The NHS ambulance service says it can cause a heart attack even in young, healthy people. People with heart disease, high blood pressure or Raynaud's should ask a clinician first.

22 23

Can I cold plunge or use a sauna alone?

Safety is better with a second sober person nearby. Reviews of cold-water and sauna deaths highlight alcohol and being alone. Open water you do not know adds more risk.

11 16

What happens to the body when you jump into cold water?

Skin cooling causes a gasp, fast breathing, a racing heart and higher blood pressure within seconds. The NHS ambulance service advises waiting about a minute for the shock to pass and floating on your back if you unexpectedly end up in cold open water.

22 16

Do cold plunges help muscle soreness?

A Cochrane review of 17 small, low-quality trials found less soreness after cold-water immersion than after rest. Certainty is low and most trials did not look for harms.

4

Do cold plunges build muscle or hurt gains?

A review says repeated cold immersion after strength training may blunt gains in strength and muscle size, while not clearly hurting endurance gains.

18

Do cold showers boost immunity?

One trial of 3,018 adults found 29 percent fewer sick days from work with a cold-ending shower routine, but no change in days of feeling ill. Evidence is low.

5

Do cold plunges lower inflammation or improve mood?

A 2025 review found inflammation markers rose right after cold immersion. Stress was lower at 12 hours and sleep improved, but mood did not. Trials were few and small.

6

Do saunas help you live longer?

In Finnish men followed for about 21 years, frequent sauna users had fewer deaths. That is an observational link and does not prove saunas caused it.

13

Do saunas lower blood pressure?

Blood pressure falls for hours after heat treatments, and in a Finnish cohort frequent users developed high blood pressure less often. Whether regular use lowers pressure for good is unproven.

20 21

Can a sauna treat depression?

One small trial found a single supervised whole-body heating session eased depression more than a sham for six weeks. A review says the evidence is not enough for general recommendations, and home saunas were not tested.

10 9

Is contrast therapy (hot then cold) better?

A large comparison ranked contrast water therapy second to hot packs for soreness in the first 24 hours, but the authors say the studies were not good enough for firm conclusions.

19

Who should avoid cold and heat exposure?

Anyone with heart disease, uncontrolled blood pressure, Raynaud's, a past episode of lung fluid in cold water, or who is pregnant, drinking alcohol or frail should ask a clinician first. No source read gave pregnancy-specific rules, so ask your midwife or doctor.

23 12 20

Explore by health goal

Mood BalanceJoint SupportPain ReliefPreventive WellnessImmune SupportHeart HealthHealthy AgingStress ReductionBetter SleepAnxiety SupportBrain HealthBlood Pressure Support

Editorial transparency
Written by
AlternativeMed editorial team. Research compiled with AI assistance, then checked against the sources.
Medical review
None. This page has not been reviewed by a physician or pharmacist.
First published
2026-10-31
Last substantive update
2026-10-31
How we research
We searched PubMed, re-read the abstract of every review, trial and cohort study cited, and read the EMAS and NHS Raynaud's pages in full. Full texts of papers were not read. Temperatures and times appear only as reported in studies.
How we rate evidence
See "How we rate evidence" in the Evidence tab.
Independence
No product is promoted on this page. No affiliate links are shown.
Sources 23

Each source was opened and checked. Where we read only the abstract, it says so. The small numbers in the text point here.

  1. Barwood MJ, Corbett J, Massey H, McMorris T, Tipton M, Wagstaff CRD. Acute Anxiety Predicts Components of the Cold Shock Response on Cold Water Immersion: Toward an Integrated Psychophysiological Model of Acute Cold Water Survival.. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID 29695988. DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00510. (abstract)
  2. Barwood MJ, Eglin C, Hills SP, Johnston N, Massey H, McMorris T. Habituation of the cold shock response: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. J Therm Biol. 2024. PMID 38211547. DOI 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2023.103775. (abstract)
  3. Bierens JJ, Lunetta P, Tipton M, Warner DS. Physiology Of Drowning: A Review.. Physiology (Bethesda). 2016. PMID 26889019. DOI 10.1152/physiol.00002.2015. (abstract)
  4. Bleakley C, McDonough S, Gardner E, Baxter GD, Hopkins JT, Davison GW. Cold-water immersion (cryotherapy) for preventing and treating muscle soreness after exercise.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID 22336838. DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD008262.pub2. (abstract)
  5. Buijze GA, Sierevelt IN, van der Heijden BC, Dijkgraaf MG, Frings-Dresen MH. The Effect of Cold Showering on Health and Work: A Randomized Controlled Trial.. PLoS One. 2016. PMID 27631616. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0161749. (abstract)
  6. Cain T, Brinsley J, Bennett H, Nelson M, Maher C, Singh B. Effects of cold-water immersion on health and wellbeing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. PLoS One. 2025. PMID 39879231. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0317615. (abstract)
  7. Costello JT, Baker PR, Minett GM, Bieuzen F, Stewart IB, Bleakley C. Whole-body cryotherapy (extreme cold air exposure) for preventing and treating muscle soreness after exercise in adults.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID 26383887. DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD010789.pub2. (abstract)
  8. Czarnecki J, Mokros L. Inverted "u-shaped" association of cold-water immersion frequency with mental health and upper respiratory tract infection: a cross-sectional study.. Brain Behav Immun Health. 2025. PMID 41127868. DOI 10.1016/j.bbih.2025.101118. (abstract)
  9. Hanusch KU, Janssen CW. The impact of whole-body hyperthermia interventions on mood and depression - are we ready for recommendations for clinical application?. Int J Hyperthermia. 2019. PMID 31159624. DOI 10.1080/02656736.2019.1612103. (abstract)
  10. Janssen CW, Lowry CA, Mehl MR, Allen JJ, Kelly KL, Gartner DE. Whole-Body Hyperthermia for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016. PMID 27172277. DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1031. (abstract)
  11. Kenttamies A, Karkola K. Death in sauna.. J Forensic Sci. 2008. PMID 18471223. DOI 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00703.x. (abstract)
  12. Kumar M, Thompson PD. A literature review of immersion pulmonary edema.. Phys Sportsmed. 2019. PMID 30403902. DOI 10.1080/00913847.2018.1546104. (abstract)
  13. Laukkanen T, Khan H, Zaccardi F, Laukkanen JA. Association between sauna bathing and fatal cardiovascular and all-cause mortality events.. JAMA Intern Med. 2015. PMID 25705824. DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.8187. (abstract)
  14. Laukkanen T, Kunutsor S, Kauhanen J, Laukkanen JA. Sauna bathing is inversely associated with dementia and Alzheimer's disease in middle-aged Finnish men.. Age Ageing. 2017. PMID 27932366. DOI 10.1093/ageing/afw212. (abstract)
  15. Laukkanen JA, Laukkanen T, Kunutsor SK. Cardiovascular and Other Health Benefits of Sauna Bathing: A Review of the Evidence.. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018. PMID 30077204. DOI 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.04.008. (abstract)
  16. Leuci L, Melau J, Messina A, Tipton M, Carenzo L. Beyond hypothermia: mechanisms of death, rescue, and prevention in cold water immersion.. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2026. PMID 42532024. DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.00578.2026. (abstract)
  17. Patrick RP, Johnson TL. Sauna use as a lifestyle practice to extend healthspan.. Exp Gerontol. 2021. PMID 34363927. DOI 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111509. (abstract)
  18. Petersen AC, Fyfe JJ. Post-exercise Cold Water Immersion Effects on Physiological Adaptations to Resistance Training and the Underlying Mechanisms in Skeletal Muscle: A Narrative Review.. Front Sports Act Living. 2021. PMID 33898988. DOI 10.3389/fspor.2021.660291. (abstract)
  19. Wang Y, Lu H, Li S, Zhang Y, Yan F, Huang Y. Effect of cold and heat therapies on pain relief in patients with delayed onset muscle soreness: A network meta-analysis.. J Rehabil Med. 2022. PMID 34636405. DOI 10.2340/jrm.v53.331. (abstract)
  20. Yamasaki S, Tokunou T, Kashiwado Y, Makishi M, Horiuchi T. Acute blood pressure responses and safety considerations in heat therapy interventions: A narrative review.. Complement Ther Med. 2026. PMID 41794190. DOI 10.1016/j.ctim.2026.103341. (abstract)
  21. Zaccardi F, Laukkanen T, Willeit P, Kunutsor SK, Kauhanen J, Laukkanen JA. Sauna Bathing and Incident Hypertension: A Prospective Cohort Study.. Am J Hypertens. 2017. PMID 28633297. DOI 10.1093/ajh/hpx102. (abstract)
  22. . East Midlands Ambulance Service (NHS): Thinking of swimming in open water? Don't risk it (published 17 July 2021). . . (full-text)
  23. . NHS: Raynaud's (reviewed 20 July 2023). . . (full-text)
Education, not medical advice. This page is for general information. It does not diagnose or treat any condition and is not a substitute for care from a qualified health professional. Natural does not automatically mean safe. Ask a clinician or pharmacist before changing your care, especially if you take medication, are pregnant or breastfeeding, or have a health condition.