Skip to content
AlternativeMed
Arnica montana flower head
Arnica montana (mountain arnica). The flower head is the part used.

Herbs & Botanicals · Herbs · Mountain flower used on the skin for bruises and sore joints, with mixed evidence; not safe to swallow

Arnica

Arnica montana L. · also called Arnica, mountain arnica, European arnica, leopard's bane, wolf's bane, mountain tobacco; árnica (Spanish), arnica des montagnes (French), Arnika (German)

Arnica is a yellow, daisy-like flower of European mountains, used for centuries as a rub for bruises, sprains and sore muscles and joints. The dried flower head goes into gels, creams, ointments, oils and tinctures for the skin. Homeopathic arnica is a separate, very diluted product. Arnica plant material is poisonous if swallowed and can cause skin allergy.

General information, not medical advice. Last substantive update · Not medically reviewed. A named clinician has not signed off on this page. How this page is made

Get your Arnica today. Order now from Amazon and have it delivered to your door.Shop Arnica on AmazonSupport our free guides: as an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

About Arnica

Arnica (Arnica montana) is a mountain flower of the daisy family. Its dried flower head is made into gels, creams, ointments and tinctures that are put on the skin for bruises, sprains and sore joints and muscles. Homeopathic arnica is a separate, very diluted product taken by mouth. The best-studied use is arnica gel for osteoarthritis, where one trial found it similar to ibuprofen gel; results for bruising and swelling are mixed. The EU recognises skin use as traditional. Arnica plant material is poisonous if swallowed, and on the skin it can cause allergy.

What it is

Arnica (Arnica montana) is a yellow, daisy-like flower of mountain meadows in Europe. It belongs to the daisy family (Asteraceae). The part used is the dried flower head. It is sold mainly as gels, creams, ointments, oils and tinctures to put on the skin. It is also the source of homeopathic arnica, a very diluted preparation sold as pills and drops.

This page covers herbal arnica for the skin and, separately, homeopathic arnica taken by mouth. They are different products. Arnica plant material should not be swallowed: it is poisonous.

16 32 14

Traditional and current uses

Arnica has been used on bruises, injuries, joint and muscle pain and swellings in Europe for centuries. The EU assessment report notes a wound-healing use recorded in 1613 and wider uses in the Middle Ages.

The EU herbal committee, in a monograph adopted on 6 May 2014, lists arnica flower for the skin as a traditional herbal medicine for bruises, sprains and local muscle pain. A draft revision released in March 2025 also lists inflammation from insect bites and small boils. These listings rest on long use, not on proof from clinical trials.

12 15 14 13

What is in it and how it works

The main active compounds in the flower head are helenalin-type sesquiterpene lactones. In the lab they block NF-kappa B, a switch that turns on many inflammation genes. The same compounds cause skin allergy and are toxic if swallowed.

Flowers from central and eastern Europe contain mostly helenalin esters, and flowers from the Iberian peninsula contain mostly dihydrohelenalin esters, so products can differ. In rat tests almost no helenalin-type compound reached the blood after skin use. All of this is lab or animal work; no study shows how arnica works in people.

31 43 22 33

What the research shows

The best-studied use is arnica gel on the skin. For osteoarthritis of the finger joints, one trial found it similar to ibuprofen gel. For bruises and swelling after procedures, results are mixed: negative in the largest placebo-controlled trial (eyelid surgery) and positive in smaller, unblinded ones.

Homeopathic arnica pills have been tested many times after surgery. Reviews find at most a small effect that does not clearly beat placebo. Nothing about arnica reaches high certainty. The best rating is moderate, and only for the claim that arnica gel is similar to ibuprofen gel in finger-joint osteoarthritis.

54 7 57 17 11 49

At a glance

Traditional uses history, not proof

  • Europe, 1613 and the Middle Ages: used on the skin for wounds, bruises, injuries and rheumatism (EU assessment report, secondary source).
  • Europe, 18th to early 19th century: used for injuries, phlebitis and rheumatic complaints; also swallowed in the past, which is now considered obsolete and unsafe.
  • Today (EU): a traditional herbal medicine for the skin, for bruises, sprains and local muscle pain; a 2025 draft adds insect-bite inflammation and small boils.

Studied for research

  • Hand osteoarthritis (gel versus ibuprofen gel), moderate
  • Knee osteoarthritis, very low
  • Sore muscles after exercise, mixed
  • Bruising after laser or surgery (skin and pills), mixed
  • Pain after tonsil, tooth and foot surgery, low
  • Skin infection by Leishmania, very low

Main compounds

  • Helenalin and related esters: sesquiterpene lactones that are anti-inflammatory in the lab, and also the main allergens and toxins
  • 11,13-dihydrohelenalin esters: the main type in Iberian flowers
  • Thymol-type volatile oil, coumarins (scopoletin, umbelliferone), flavonoids and phenolic acids

Common forms

  • Gels, creams and ointments with arnica flower extract, for the skin
  • Tinctures and oils for the skin; the EU says tinctures must be diluted
  • Homeopathic arnica pills and drops, a different product
  • Arnica tea and strong extracts for swallowing are not safe

Research links: EU herbal medicine page for arnica flower (European Medicines Agency) · EU draft herbal monograph on arnica flower, revision 1 (EMA) · EU public summary on arnica flower (EMA) · Cochrane review: topical herbal therapies for osteoarthritis · Research Library · Genes & Biomarkers Library

The plant and its history

Accepted scientific name
Arnica montana L.
Naming authority
L.; published in Species Plantarum, page 884 (1753) (GBIF).
Synonyms
GBIF lists Arnica helvetica G.Don ex Loudon (1830), Arnica montana var. montana and Arnica plantaginifolia Gilib. as synonyms.
Common names
Arnica; mountain arnica; European arnica; leopard's bane; wolf's bane; mountain tobacco (English); Arnica des montagnes (French); Arnika, Berg-Wohlverleih (German); Árnica, flor de (EU monograph name) (Spanish)
Botanical family
Asteraceae (daisy family, also called Compositae). Many plants of this family cause contact allergy through sesquiterpene lactones, which is why arnica allergy and cross-reactions matter.
Classification
Plantae > Tracheophyta > Magnoliopsida > Asterales > Asteraceae > Arnica > Arnica montana
Native range
Not verified from a primary botanical source in this file. The EU report and reviews describe a plant of European mountain meadows, with Iberian populations also discussed (Schmidt 2023).
Habitat
Not verified from a primary source for this file.
What the plant looks like
Roots: Roots and rhizomes are mentioned in cosmetic ingredient listings but are not the medicinal part in the EU monograph. Not verified further.; Stems: Not verified from a primary source.; Leaves: Not part of the EU medicinal use.; Flowers: The flower heads (Arnicae flos) are the medicinal part. The European Pharmacopoeia defines the herbal substance as the whole or partially broken, dried flower heads of Arnica montana, with at least 0.4% sesquiterpene lactones (EU report).; Fruit: Not relevant to the medicinal use; not verified.
Cultivation
Not verified from a primary source read.
Harvest and processing
The EU report describes Arnica tincture (European Pharmacopoeia) as one part dried flower to ten parts ethanol 60 to 70%, with at least 0.04% sesquiterpene lactones calculated as dihydrohelenalin tiglate. Cosmetic extracts are made by alcohol maceration or by soaking in soybean oil (CIR).
Look-alikes and adulterants
Name: Mexican arnica (Heterotheca inuloides); Note: The most common adulterant of arnica flowers according to the EU report. A different Asteraceae plant. GBIF: accepted, key 5401982.; Name: Arnica chamissonis (chamisso arnica); Note: A related Arnica species; the EU report lists a liquid extract of Arnica chamissonis flower among the products in its safety database search. GBIF: accepted species, key 5405938. It is not the plant covered by the EU monograph.; Name: Brazilian arnica (Solidago chilensis); Note: A different plant (goldenrod) sometimes called Brazilian arnica; trials of it exist but are not about Arnica montana. GBIF: accepted, key 5389072.; Name: Other flowers named as adulterants; Note: The EU report names Chrysanthemum segetum, Crepis biennis, Hieracium lachmalii, Hypochoeris species, Picris hieracioides, Taraxacum officinale and Tussilago farfara (GBIF key 3149879, accepted).
Sustainability and conservation
Not verified. No assessment was retrieved.

Traditional use and history history, not clinical proof

Tradition or eraDocumented useSource
Europe, 1613The EU assessment report, quoting Madaus (1938), says a wound-healing effect was attributed to arnica in a manual by Tabernaemontanus in 1613.s-ema-ar-arnica-2025-draft
Medieval EuropeThe EU report says arnica was used as a medicinal plant in many ways: on the skin for bruises, injuries, varicose veins, phlebitis, gout and rheumatism, and by mouth for indigestion and heart complaints. Secondary-source statement; original texts were not checked.s-ema-ar-arnica-2025-draft
Ancient Greece and RomeThe EU report quotes a review (Jennet-Siems 2019) that no references to arnica as a medicinal plant can be found in ancient Greek or Roman writings. Secondary-source statement.s-ema-ar-arnica-2025-draft
18th and early 19th centuriesArnica gained importance as a remedy for phlebitis, injuries, bruises and rheumatic complaints, and was also taken by mouth as a stimulant and, abusively, to provoke abortion (EU report, citing Schmidt 2023 and others). Secondary-source statement.s-ema-ar-arnica-2025-draft
20th century to todayArnica flower is covered by reference books and monographs: Hager, the German Commission E, ESCOP and WHO (2007), as listed in the EU report. The EU herbal committee adopted its monograph on 6 May 2014 for skin use for bruises, sprains and localised muscle pain; a draft revision followed on 19 March 2025. Not independently confirmed beyond the EMA documents.s-ema-hmpc-arnica-monograph-2014

Traditional use shows how a plant was used. It does not show that a supplement works or is safe today.

What is inside, and how it may work

What the plant contains and how those compounds act in cells and animals. Laboratory and animal mechanisms are not proven effects in people.

Main compounds

CompoundFamilyWhere it is concentratedActivity studiedLevel of evidence
Helenalin and its esters (e.g. helenalin isobutyrate, 6-O-acetylhelenalin)
PubChem 23205
sesquiterpene lactone (helenanolide type)Flower head
Total sesquiterpene lactones at least 0.4% of dried flower (Ph. Eur. as quoted by EMA); the proportion of helenalin esters varies with origin.
Blocks the inflammation switch NF-kappa B in cells by binding its p65 part; also the main allergen and toxic compound. Related esters: helenalin acetate PubChem CID 442142; helenalin isobutyrate CID 9996862. 31 27 10 43 33 14Laboratory research
11,13-dihydrohelenalin and its esters (plenolin)
PubChem 442294
sesquiterpene lactone (helenanolide type)Flower head
Dominant type in flowers from the Iberian peninsula; helenalin esters predominate in central and eastern European flowers (Schmidt 2023).
Anti-inflammatory in lab tests, less potent than helenalin esters in some tests (Schmidt 2023); also a skin sensitiser. 43 33 14Laboratory research
Thymol and thymol derivatives
PubChem 6989
monoterpene phenol (volatile oil)Flower head
Not verified.
Named in the EU report as part of the flower's volatile oil. No arnica-specific activity read. 14 33Authoritative guidance
Scopoletin
PubChem 5280460
coumarinFlower head
Not verified.
Named in the EU report as a flower constituent. No arnica-specific activity read. 14 33Authoritative guidance
Umbelliferone
PubChem 5281426
coumarinFlower head
Not verified.
Named in the EU report as a flower constituent. No arnica-specific activity read. 14 33Authoritative guidance
Flavonoids and phenolic acidspolyphenols (compound group)Flower head
Not verified.
An arnica flower extract rich in phenolic acids reduced platelet clumping in the test tube. Flavonols were linked to an extract's positive Ames test in an old study quoted by the EU report. No single compound identified. 41 14Laboratory research

Mechanisms, receptors and pathways

Target or pathwayGene or receptorWhat was foundLevel
NF-kappa B inflammation switchNF-kB (p65 subunit)Helenalin-type sesquiterpene lactones block NF-kappa B in cells by alkylating (chemically binding) its p65 part. Arnica tinctures suppressed NF-kappa B activation and the signal IL-12 in immune cells at high concentrations, and stimulated them at low concentrations. This is lab work and has not been shown to explain any effect in people. 27 31 10Laboratory research
NF-AT transcription factorNFATA review says the lactones also inhibit NF-AT at micromolar concentrations in the lab. 31Laboratory research
Skin allergy balanceCD4 T cells, MHC II (mouse model)In normal mice arnica tinctures and lactones did not cause contact allergy and even reduced a strong allergic reaction, probably through anti-inflammatory and immune-regulating effects. Allergy to arnica could be induced in mice with a weakened immune system. In people, allergy to arnica is documented in patients. 27 38Animal research
Platelet clumpingADP-induced platelet aggregationA phenolic-acid-rich arnica flower extract lowered ADP-induced platelet clumping and platelet reactivity in the test tube, with no platelet toxicity. No human test of skin or swallowed arnica on platelets was found. 41Laboratory research
Skin absorption and retentionskin layers, skin proteinsIn lab skin samples 97.6 to 99.3% of the lactones entered the skin within 48 hours; at most 8.4% (pig), 14.6% and 36.4% (two human skin samples) passed through, and much was bound to skin proteins. In rats almost none reached the blood. 23 22Laboratory research
Anti-Leishmania activityLeishmania parasiteThe authors of the human trial say earlier lab work and a hamster model showed activity of arnica tincture against the parasite; the trial in people was small and open. 40Animal research

Absorption, metabolism and elimination

Absorption
No human blood-level data for arnica products were found. In rats, 84% of applied lactones were absorbed into skin, but plasma, urine and faeces held less than 0.3 ng/mL. In lab diffusion cells, 8.4 to 36.4% passed through skin in 48 hours depending on the skin sample.
Distribution
Lactones accumulated in the outer skin (epidermis) in a fluorescence test and a large share bound irreversibly to skin proteins.
Metabolism
Extensive metabolism is the likely reason helenalin-type compounds could not be found in blood after skin use (rat study). The EU report quotes in-vitro metabolism studies in rat, pig and human preparations.
Elimination
Not known for people.
Bioavailability
Unknown in people; the EU monograph says pharmacokinetic studies are not required for traditional-use registration and none are available.

22 23 14

Isolated compounds versus whole extracts

The EU monograph covers whole-flower extracts (tinctures, fluid extracts, oil extracts), not isolated compounds. The main active compounds, helenalin-type lactones, are also the allergens and toxins. Their mix differs with where the flowers grew, and potency is reported to differ between types, so one product is not the same as another. Isolated helenalin is toxic enough that it has not been developed as a drug (Drogosz 2019).

Nutritional composition

Arnica is not a food. It is not eaten, and it contributes no nutrients. No nutrient or food-interaction data apply.

15benefits and uses looked at
57studies and sources checked
Moderate certaintybest evidence rating found
16lab markers tracked in trials

1 moderate certainty6 mixed findings4 low certainty3 very low certainty1 not enough evidence

What was looked at

The 15 benefits and uses checked for Arnica, each with how strong the evidence is. Tap one to open it.

Lab markers tracked in the studies

Pain score (visual scale or WOMAC pain)WOMAC total score (knee)Hand function scoreBruise score (rater or photograph)Swelling (oedema) after surgeryC-reactive protein (CRP)Creatine kinase (CK) and myoglobinComplete healing of skin lesions (leishmaniasis)Knee circumference after surgeryBruise area and colour after face surgeryPain after surgery (scores and painkillers)Haemoglobin after childbirthBlood in surgical drainsBleeding time and clotting testsC-reactive protein (CRP) after heart surgeryMuscle soreness (VAS) after running

What is Arnica good for?

The main proposed uses and how strong the human evidence is for each. "Moderate" means one fair-quality trial, "low" or "very low" means small or flawed studies, "mixed" means trials disagree, and "insufficient" means no firm conclusion could be drawn. Arnica on the skin and homeopathic arnica pills are different products and are labelled in each row.

Osteoarthritis of the finger joints (arnica gel on the skin)Moderate certaintyIn one 3-week trial of 204 people, arnica gel eased pain and helped hand function about as much as ibuprofen gel. The Cochrane review rates this as moderate-certainty evidence that the two are similar. There was no placebo gel, so it does not show that arnica beats placebo. Knee osteoarthritis (arnica gel on the skin)Very low certaintyAn open trial of 79 people found lower knee scores after 6 weeks of arnica gel. With no comparison group, this cannot show the gel was the cause. Sore muscles after hard exerciseMixed findingsTwo small trials of arnica on the skin disagree: one found less pain 3 days after hard running, the other found more pain a day after calf exercises. A mud pack with menthol and arnica helped 10 men, but menthol may be why. A large trial of 519 runners found homeopathic arnica pills did not reduce soreness. Bruises made by a laser or after laser treatmentMixed findingsOne trial found 20% arnica ointment cleared laser-made bruises better than plain petrolatum. Another, in patients treated with a laser for thread veins, found no difference from the plain base. Bruising, swelling and pain after surgery (arnica on the skin)Mixed findingsA 136-person trial found arnica ointment did nothing after eyelid surgery. Two trials without a placebo (nose surgery, wisdom-tooth removal) found less bruising, swelling or pain than with no cream. Bruises, sprains and local muscle pain (traditional use)Not enough evidenceThe EU lists arnica flower skin products as a traditional medicine for these, based on long use. The EU committee said firm conclusions could not be drawn from the clinical studies. Reviews of the trials call the evidence mixed or too thin. Bruising and swelling after surgery (homeopathic arnica pills)Mixed findingsTrials of homeopathic or oral arnica after face-lift, eyelid, nose, knee and hand surgery give scattered, mostly small or non-significant results. Reviews found a small effect that did not clearly beat placebo, and an eye-surgeon review found no or negligible benefit for bruising. Pain after tonsil, tooth and foot surgery (homeopathic or oral arnica)Low certaintyFour small studies found less pain with arnica after throat, wisdom-tooth and bunion surgery. They were small, one was not randomised, and in one 4 in 10 questionnaires were missing. Arnica matched diclofenac for wound redness and swelling after bunion surgery but was worse for pain. Bleeding after childbirth (homeopathic arnica with Bellis perennis)Very low certaintyIn 40 women a two-remedy homeopathic combination was linked to a smaller fall in haemoglobin after birth. This is a preliminary result and is not about arnica alone. Bleeding and blood clottingLow certaintyA homeopathic arnica and Bryonia combination did not reduce bleeding after heart-valve surgery, and homeopathic arnica did not change clotting tests in healthy volunteers. These trials do not tell us about herbal arnica. Skin infection with Leishmania parasites (arnica tincture)Very low certaintyIn a small open trial of 16 people, all 12 who finished follow-up were healed after arnica tincture on the lesion. There was no comparison group and 4 people dropped out.

Benefits, one by one

Each card is a research question, not a promise. Tap a goal to filter. Open a card to see the studies, doses and limits.

Osteoarthritis of the finger joints: arnica gel compared with ibuprofen gel

Moderate certainty

One 3-week trial of 204 people found arnica gel eased pain and improved hand function about as much as ibuprofen gel. There was no placebo gel, so it does not prove arnica beats placebo.

3 studiesArnica tincture gel on the finger joints, 3 weeks (trial form only).

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Widrig 2007: 204 adults with X-ray confirmed, painful osteoarthritis of the finger joints were assigned by chance, with both groups unaware of which gel they had, to arnica gel (tincture 50 g per 100 g, drug-extract ratio 1:20) or 5% ibuprofen gel for 21 days. Pain and hand function improved to a similar degree in both groups. The Cochrane review of topical herbal treatments for osteoarthritis (Cameron 2013) rates this single trial as moderate-certainty evidence that arnica gel probably gives similar benefit to ibuprofen gel.

Results

Arnica gel was not worse than ibuprofen gel for pain or hand function over 21 days. Adverse events: 4.8% with arnica and 6.1% with ibuprofen in the trial; the Cochrane review reports 13% versus 8% (relative risk 1.65, 95% CI 0.72 to 3.76, not significant).

Effect sizes as reported

Cochrane: pain difference vs ibuprofen gel -3.8 points on a 0 to 100 scale (95% CI -10.1 to 2.5); hand function difference -0.4 points on a 0 to 30 scale (95% CI -1.75 to 0.95).

Why this rating

Cochrane rated it moderate certainty, but it rests on one trial and compares arnica with another gel, not with placebo. We apply "moderate" only to the claim that arnica gel is similar to ibuprofen gel in this setting.

Form and dose studied

Arnica tincture gel on the finger joints, 3 weeks (trial form only).

Who was studied

Adults with painful finger-joint osteoarthritis.

Limits

One trial; no placebo group; the two reports give different adverse-event rates; funding not stated in the abstract.

Why researchers looked

Osteoarthritis of the hands is common and painful, and people look for creams that are gentler than tablets.

Traditional use

Arnica flower heads have been rubbed on bruises and sore joints in Europe for centuries. The EU herbal committee lists arnica flower for the skin as a traditional medicine for bruises, sprains and local muscle pain, on the basis of long use and not on clinical-trial proof (EMA).

Proposed mechanism Preliminary mechanism

Lab studies show that helenalin-type compounds in arnica flowers block NF-kappa B, a switch that turns on many inflammation genes (Merfort 2003 review). This is lab work, and it has not been shown to explain any result in people.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Safety is covered in the safety section. Arnica on the skin can cause allergic rash, especially in people allergic to daisy-family plants. Do not use on broken skin. Do not swallow arnica plant products.

54 7 46

Knee osteoarthritis: fresh-plant arnica gel (open trial)

Very low certainty

In an open trial with no comparison group, 79 people using arnica gel for 6 weeks had lower knee-pain and stiffness scores. Without a control group this cannot show the gel was the cause.

2 studiesArnica fresh-plant gel on the knee, 6 weeks (trial form only).

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Knuesel 2002: 26 men and 53 women with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis used arnica fresh-plant gel twice a day. Total WOMAC scores (a joint pain, stiffness and function questionnaire) fell at 3 and 6 weeks (both P<0.0001). Local adverse events were 7.6%, including one allergic reaction.

Results

WOMAC scores fell. Nobody was left untreated for comparison and nobody was blinded.

Effect sizes as reported

Median WOMAC fall significant (P<0.0001) at 3 and 6 weeks; sizes not given in the abstract.

Why this rating

Single arm, no placebo, no blinding. Natural ups and downs of knee pain and expectation of help can produce this kind of change.

Form and dose studied

Arnica fresh-plant gel on the knee, 6 weeks (trial form only).

Who was studied

Adults with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis.

Limits

No control group, no blinding, one study.

Why researchers looked

Knee osteoarthritis is a main reason people use pain gels.

Traditional use

Arnica flower heads have been rubbed on bruises and sore joints in Europe for centuries. The EU herbal committee lists arnica flower for the skin as a traditional medicine for bruises, sprains and local muscle pain, on the basis of long use and not on clinical-trial proof (EMA).

Proposed mechanism Preliminary mechanism

Lab studies show that helenalin-type compounds in arnica flowers block NF-kappa B, a switch that turns on many inflammation genes (Merfort 2003 review). This is lab work, and it has not been shown to explain any result in people.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Safety is covered in the safety section. Arnica on the skin can cause allergic rash, especially in people allergic to daisy-family plants. Do not use on broken skin. Do not swallow arnica plant products.

25 46

Muscle soreness after hard exercise: arnica on the skin

Mixed findings

Two small trials in healthy people give different answers: one found less pain three days after hard running, the other found more pain a day after calf exercises. A mud pack with menthol and arnica helped soreness in 10 men, but menthol may be the reason.

3 studiesArnica cream or gel after exercise; the mud pack was a combination.

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Pumpa 2014: 20 trained men ran downhill, then used topical arnica or placebo for 96 hours. The arnica group reported less pain by VAS and tenderness at 72 hours. Performance tests and blood markers of inflammation and muscle damage (including CRP and creatine kinase) did not change. Adkison 2010: 53 volunteers did calf raises and put arnica cream on one leg and placebo on the other. Pain at 24 hours was higher with arnica (3.04 vs 2.36, p<0.005). There was no difference at later days, in tenderness or in ankle movement. Bartolomei 2022: a mud pack with menthol and arnica was used on the thighs of 10 men in a crossover; soreness and one slow-speed strength test were better with the pack, other tests not. Arnica cannot be separated from menthol and mud here.

Results

Inconsistent: one benefit at 72 hours, one worse result at 24 hours, and a combination product that helped.

Effect sizes as reported

Pumpa: pain lower at 72 hours; no change in markers. Adkison: 3.04 vs 2.36 at 24 hours in favour of placebo. Bartolomei: p=0.001 for soreness interaction (combination product).

Why this rating

Two single-arnica trials point in opposite directions, both are small and in healthy volunteers, and the third trial used a combination.

Form and dose studied

Arnica cream or gel after exercise; the mud pack was a combination.

Who was studied

Healthy, mostly male, exercise volunteers.

Limits

Small trials; unclear products and strengths; healthy volunteers; combination product.

Why researchers looked

Athletes use arnica creams for sore muscles after hard training.

Traditional use

Arnica flower heads have been rubbed on bruises and sore joints in Europe for centuries. The EU herbal committee lists arnica flower for the skin as a traditional medicine for bruises, sprains and local muscle pain, on the basis of long use and not on clinical-trial proof (EMA).

Proposed mechanism Preliminary mechanism

Lab studies show that helenalin-type compounds in arnica flowers block NF-kappa B, a switch that turns on many inflammation genes (Merfort 2003 review). This is lab work, and it has not been shown to explain any result in people.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Safety is covered in the safety section. Arnica on the skin can cause allergic rash, especially in people allergic to daisy-family plants. Do not use on broken skin. Do not swallow arnica plant products.

37 1 5

Bruises made by a laser or after laser treatment

Mixed findings

In one trial 20% arnica ointment cleared laser-made bruises better than plain petrolatum. A second trial, using arnica gel on face bruises after laser, found no difference from the plain base.

3 studies20% arnica ointment under cover (Leu); arnica gel (Alonso).

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Leu 2010: four standard bruises were made on each volunteer's arms with a pulsed-dye laser. Each bruise got one of 20% arnica ointment, 5% vitamin K, 1% vitamin K with 0.3% retinol, or white petrolatum, under cover twice a day for 2 weeks. A dermatologist who did not know the treatment scored photographs. Arnica improved the bruise score more than petrolatum (P=0.003) and more than 1% vitamin K plus retinol (P=0.01), but not more than 5% vitamin K. Alonso 2002: 19 patients with facial thread veins used arnica gel in a split-face design for 2 weeks before or after pulsed-dye laser. There was no difference from vehicle either way (P=0.496 and P=0.359).

Results

One positive trial on made-up bruises and one null trial on real post-laser bruising.

Effect sizes as reported

Leu: significant difference from petrolatum (P=0.003) in rater bruise score; numbers not given in the abstract. Alonso: no difference.

Why this rating

Two small trials of different design disagree. The positive one used bruises created on healthy skin.

Form and dose studied

20% arnica ointment under cover (Leu); arnica gel (Alonso).

Who was studied

Healthy volunteers and patients treated with pulsed-dye laser.

Limits

Small, different designs; Leu number of volunteers not stated in abstract.

Why researchers looked

People want bruises from skin procedures to fade faster.

Traditional use

Arnica flower heads have been rubbed on bruises and sore joints in Europe for centuries. The EU herbal committee lists arnica flower for the skin as a traditional medicine for bruises, sprains and local muscle pain, on the basis of long use and not on clinical-trial proof (EMA).

Proposed mechanism Preliminary mechanism

Lab studies show that helenalin-type compounds in arnica flowers block NF-kappa B, a switch that turns on many inflammation genes (Merfort 2003 review). This is lab work, and it has not been shown to explain any result in people.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Safety is covered in the safety section. Arnica on the skin can cause allergic rash, especially in people allergic to daisy-family plants. Do not use on broken skin. Do not swallow arnica plant products.

28 3 42

Bruising, swelling and pain after surgery: arnica creams and ointments

Mixed findings

A large trial found arnica ointment did nothing after eyelid surgery, but two trials without a placebo (nose surgery and wisdom-tooth surgery) found less bruising, swelling or pain than with no cream.

4 studiesArnica ointment 10% (van Exsel); arnica creams otherwise, strengths n…

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

van Exsel 2016: 136 people having upper eyelid surgery were assigned arnica ointment 10% or placebo ointment on one eyelid, with the other eyelid left untreated. Overall appearance at 3 days, 7 days and 6 weeks, and swelling, bruising, redness, pain and satisfaction, did not differ between arnica, placebo or no ointment. Simsek 2016: 108 people after open nose surgery used arnica cream, polysulfate cream or nothing; bruising and swelling fell faster with either cream than with nothing (p<0.005 on days 1, 5 and 7). Akay 2024: 60 people after lower wisdom-tooth removal used topical arnica or polysulfate on top of standard antibiotic and anti-inflammatory tablets. Pain was lower than standard care alone until day 5, and mouth opening was better with arnica. Neither of these two trials had a placebo cream.

Results

Conflicting: no benefit in the blinded placebo trial; benefit in two trials with no placebo, in which people knew whether they had a cream.

Effect sizes as reported

van Exsel: no difference from placebo on any measure. Simsek and Akay: significant differences from no extra treatment (p<0.005; p<0.05).

Why this rating

The only placebo-controlled trial found nothing; the positive trials could not blind people.

Form and dose studied

Arnica ointment 10% (van Exsel); arnica creams otherwise, strengths not stated.

Who was studied

Adults after eyelid, nose or wisdom-tooth surgery.

Limits

Different surgeries; no placebo in two trials; strengths not stated.

Why researchers looked

Surgeons and patients often use arnica to reduce bruising after cosmetic and dental surgery.

Traditional use

Arnica flower heads have been rubbed on bruises and sore joints in Europe for centuries. The EU herbal committee lists arnica flower for the skin as a traditional medicine for bruises, sprains and local muscle pain, on the basis of long use and not on clinical-trial proof (EMA).

Proposed mechanism Preliminary mechanism

Lab studies show that helenalin-type compounds in arnica flowers block NF-kappa B, a switch that turns on many inflammation genes (Merfort 2003 review). This is lab work, and it has not been shown to explain any result in people.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Safety is covered in the safety section. Arnica on the skin can cause allergic rash, especially in people allergic to daisy-family plants. Do not use on broken skin. Do not swallow arnica plant products.

57 45 2 18

Bruises, sprains and local muscle pain: the traditional use and what reviews say

Not enough evidence

The EU lists arnica flower skin products as a traditional medicine for bruises, sprains and local muscle pain, on the basis of long use. Reviews of the trials call the evidence mixed or too thin to confirm it.

10 studiesArnica flower tinctures and extracts in creams, gels and oils (EU mon…

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

The EU herbal committee concluded that, although a possible effect on pain and bruising was seen in some clinical studies, firm conclusions could not be drawn because the studies were small or had no controls, so the use rests on tradition (EMA public summary; assessment report). Systematic reviews: Ho 2016 found insufficient data to support arnica after skin procedures; the American Academy of Ophthalmology report (Tao 2022) found no or negligible benefit over placebo in 7 controlled studies for bruising after eye-area surgery or laser; Toma 2024 (42 papers) reports positive and negative results; Stack 2026 counted 15 of 27 surgical studies with a measurable benefit and 9 with none (oral and topical combined). Narrative reviews by Smith 2021 and Iannitti 2016 are more positive but are not systematic.

Results

No consistent proof of benefit; no proof of harm from skin use in unbroken skin apart from allergy.

Effect sizes as reported

No pooled effect size for topical arnica alone. Stack 2026: 55.6% of studies positive, 33.3% null (a count, not an effect).

Why this rating

Reviewers disagree and the best controlled trials are small or negative. EMA itself relies on traditional use.

Form and dose studied

Arnica flower tinctures and extracts in creams, gels and oils (EU monograph forms).

Who was studied

Adults and adolescents; the EU summary says from age 12.

Limits

Reviews mix oral and skin forms and homeopathic and herbal forms.

Why researchers looked

This is the main traditional use of arnica and the reason most people buy it.

Traditional use

Arnica flower heads have been rubbed on bruises and sore joints in Europe for centuries. The EU herbal committee lists arnica flower for the skin as a traditional medicine for bruises, sprains and local muscle pain, on the basis of long use and not on clinical-trial proof (EMA).

Proposed mechanism Preliminary mechanism

Lab studies show that helenalin-type compounds in arnica flowers block NF-kappa B, a switch that turns on many inflammation genes (Merfort 2003 review). This is lab work, and it has not been shown to explain any result in people.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Safety is covered in the safety section. Arnica on the skin can cause allergic rash, especially in people allergic to daisy-family plants. Do not use on broken skin. Do not swallow arnica plant products.

13 14 12 18 49 50 47 46 20 42

Skin infection with Leishmania parasites: arnica tincture (early trial)

Very low certainty

In a small open trial of 16 people, all 12 who finished follow-up were healed after 30 or 45 days of arnica tincture on the lesion. There was no comparison group.

2 studiesArnica tincture on the lesion, three times a day; this is a research …

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Robledo 2025: 16 adults with proven simple cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia were randomly assigned to arnica tincture from flowers on the lesion three times a day for 30 or 45 days. Twelve finished the 180-day follow-up and all had complete healing. Four withdrew consent. Side effects at the application site were mild: redness, pain, swelling and burning.

Results

All 12 completers healed; the rate among everyone enrolled is not known.

Effect sizes as reported

100% healing in 12 completers; 4 of 16 dropped out.

Why this rating

Open label, 16 people, no comparison with standard treatment or with no treatment.

Form and dose studied

Arnica tincture on the lesion, three times a day; this is a research regimen and not a recommended use.

Who was studied

Adults with cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia.

Limits

Phase Ib/II study. No competing interests were declared.

Why researchers looked

Standard drugs for this parasite skin infection are toxic, so researchers tested a plant they had already found active against the parasite in the lab and in hamsters.

Traditional use

Arnica flower heads have been rubbed on bruises and sore joints in Europe for centuries. The EU herbal committee lists arnica flower for the skin as a traditional medicine for bruises, sprains and local muscle pain, on the basis of long use and not on clinical-trial proof (EMA).

Proposed mechanism Laboratory research

Lab and hamster work found that arnica tincture acts against the parasite, and rat studies found the helenalin-type compounds stay mostly in the skin and barely reach the blood (Jurgens 2022).

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Side effects were skin redness, pain, swelling and burning where the tincture was applied.

40 22

Homeopathic arnica after surgery: reviews of the trials

Mixed findings

Two reviews of trials of homeopathic arnica around surgery found a small or no benefit over placebo. The newer meta-analysis found a small effect that did not reach statistical significance against placebo.

4 studiesHomeopathic dilutions (6C to 30C or 4D to 12D) in pills or globules. …

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Ernst and Pittler 1998 reviewed 8 placebo-controlled trials, most with serious method flaws, and concluded they did not suggest homeopathic arnica works better than placebo. Gaertner 2021 (PROSPERO-registered) pooled 28 comparisons from 23 publications: placebo-controlled trials gave Hedges g 0.18 (95% CI -0.007 to 0.373; p=0.059), which includes zero; trials against active drugs gave g 0.26, mostly from non-randomised studies, and the effect moved towards zero in randomised ones. One author is a homeopathy-trained doctor. The review by Stack 2026 (oral and skin forms together) found 15 of 27 surgical studies positive and 9 null.

Results

Small at best; not clearly different from placebo.

Effect sizes as reported

Gaertner 2021: g=0.18 (95% CI -0.007 to 0.373) vs placebo.

Why this rating

Reviews of the same field disagree in tone, the pooled effect is not statistically significant, and trials are small and varied.

Form and dose studied

Homeopathic dilutions (6C to 30C or 4D to 12D) in pills or globules. No amount is advised here.

Who was studied

Adults having surgery.

Limits

Many trials are small and used different dilutions and surgeries.

Why researchers looked

Homeopathic arnica is the remedy most often tested against placebo, usually around surgery.

Traditional use

Homeopathic arnica is made from the arnica plant and is used by people who follow homeopathy for bruises and injuries. The EU herbal committee says homeopathic preparations are completely different from the herbal preparations it assessed (EMA).

Proposed mechanism Pharmacological theory

There is no accepted explanation for how very high dilutions might work. Lab and animal work on arnica compounds (helenalin-type compounds) concerns the herbal extract, not homeopathic dilutions.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Safety is covered in the safety section. Homeopathic dilutions in tablets are generally mild, but swallowing a large amount of the pills by mistake caused serious illness in one reported case, and arnica plant material should not be swallowed.

11 17 47 20

Knee swelling after knee surgery

Low certainty

Three trials in 319 people after knee operations found a trend to less swelling with homeopathic arnica 30x, but only the smallest-effect trial of the three, in cruciate ligament repair, was significant.

1 studiesHomeopathic arnica 30x globules (trial form).

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Brinkhaus 2006: three double-blind placebo-controlled trials with homeopathic arnica 30x started before surgery. Change in knee circumference was similar in arthroscopy (-0.25%, 95% CI -0.85 to 0.41; n=227) and knee replacement (-1.68%, -4.24 to 0.77; n=35). In cruciate ligament repair (n=57) arnica showed -1.80% (95% CI -3.30 to -0.30, p=0.019).

Results

One of three trials was significant.

Effect sizes as reported

Differences in knee circumference change: -0.25%, -1.68%, -1.80% (see CIs in text).

Why this rating

Single research group, three trials, one significant result of 319 people.

Form and dose studied

Homeopathic arnica 30x globules (trial form).

Who was studied

Adults having knee surgery.

Limits

Only three trials; small effects.

Why researchers looked

Swelling after knee surgery slows recovery.

Traditional use

Homeopathic arnica is made from the arnica plant and is used by people who follow homeopathy for bruises and injuries. The EU herbal committee says homeopathic preparations are completely different from the herbal preparations it assessed (EMA).

Proposed mechanism Pharmacological theory

There is no accepted explanation for how very high dilutions might work. Lab and animal work on arnica compounds (helenalin-type compounds) concerns the herbal extract, not homeopathic dilutions.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Safety is covered in the safety section. Homeopathic dilutions in tablets are generally mild, but swallowing a large amount of the pills by mistake caused serious illness in one reported case, and arnica plant material should not be swallowed.

6

Bruising after face, eyelid and nose surgery

Mixed findings

Trials of homeopathic or oral arnica after face-lift, eyelid and nose surgery give mixed results; a review by eye surgeons found no or negligible benefit over placebo.

5 studiesOral or homeopathic arnica (forms differ; Chaiet used a named commerc…

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Seeley 2006 (29 face-lift patients): no difference in colour or ratings, but a smaller bruised area on days 1 and 7. Kotlus 2010 (eyelid surgery, each person tested on both sides): no difference in bruise area, severity or resolution. Chaiet 2016 (22 nose-surgery patients): bruise extent 16.2%, 32.9% and 20.4% smaller on days 2 or 3, 7 and 9 or 10, significant on day 7 only at a cut-off of P<0.1. Totonchi 2007 (48 nose-surgery patients, arnica vs steroids vs nothing): less swelling on day 2 with arnica, no benefit for bruising. The American Academy of Ophthalmology report (Tao 2022) found no or negligible benefit versus placebo in 7 controlled studies.

Results

Small, scattered positive signs; the best-controlled eyelid trial was negative.

Effect sizes as reported

Chaiet: significant only at P=0.097 (loose threshold). Others no difference.

Why this rating

Small trials with different measures and thresholds; the AAO review does not support it.

Form and dose studied

Oral or homeopathic arnica (forms differ; Chaiet used a named commercial product).

Who was studied

Adults having face, eyelid or nose surgery.

Limits

Small samples, lenient cut-off in one trial, arnica form unclear in another.

Why researchers looked

People having cosmetic surgery want bruises to fade quickly.

Traditional use

Homeopathic arnica is made from the arnica plant and is used by people who follow homeopathy for bruises and injuries. The EU herbal committee says homeopathic preparations are completely different from the herbal preparations it assessed (EMA).

Proposed mechanism Pharmacological theory

There is no accepted explanation for how very high dilutions might work. Lab and animal work on arnica compounds (helenalin-type compounds) concerns the herbal extract, not homeopathic dilutions.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Safety is covered in the safety section. Homeopathic dilutions in tablets are generally mild, but swallowing a large amount of the pills by mistake caused serious illness in one reported case, and arnica plant material should not be swallowed.

44 26 8 51 49

Pain and bruising after hand surgery and varicose vein surgery

Mixed findings

In 3 small trials homeopathic arnica did not clearly help: no effect after carpal tunnel surgery, a non-significant trend after varicose vein surgery, and less pain at 2 weeks with arnica pills plus ointment.

3 studiesHomeopathic arnica 6C, 30C or D12; tablets plus ointment in one trial.

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Stevinson 2003: 64 adults before carpal tunnel surgery took arnica 30C, arnica 6C or placebo; no group differences in pain (P=0.79), bruising (P=0.45), swelling or painkillers. Wolf 2003: 60 patients after varicose vein surgery took arnica D12 or placebo; bruise area fell 75.5% with arnica and 71.5% with placebo (p=0.4726), pain fall 1.0 vs 0.3 points (p=0.1977); authors saw a trend needing a larger trial. Jeffrey 2002: 37 patients after keyhole wrist release on both hands received homeopathic tablets plus herbal arnica ointment versus placebos; pain was lower at 2 weeks (P<0.03) with no difference in grip strength or wrist size. Two forms were given together.

Results

No clear benefit; trends only.

Effect sizes as reported

Stevinson: no difference. Wolf: p=0.47 and p=0.20. Jeffrey: pain lower at week 2 (P<0.03).

Why this rating

Three small trials; one combines pills and ointment.

Form and dose studied

Homeopathic arnica 6C, 30C or D12; tablets plus ointment in one trial.

Who was studied

Adults after hand or vein surgery.

Limits

Small trials, one combination.

Why researchers looked

These operations cause bruising and pain, and arnica is a common add-on.

Traditional use

Homeopathic arnica is made from the arnica plant and is used by people who follow homeopathy for bruises and injuries. The EU herbal committee says homeopathic preparations are completely different from the herbal preparations it assessed (EMA).

Proposed mechanism Pharmacological theory

There is no accepted explanation for how very high dilutions might work. Lab and animal work on arnica compounds (helenalin-type compounds) concerns the herbal extract, not homeopathic dilutions.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Safety is covered in the safety section. Homeopathic dilutions in tablets are generally mild, but swallowing a large amount of the pills by mistake caused serious illness in one reported case, and arnica plant material should not be swallowed.

48 55 21

Pain after tonsil, tooth and foot surgery

Low certainty

Four small studies found less pain with homeopathic or oral arnica after throat, wisdom-tooth and bunion surgery, but one was not randomised, one had only 10 people and 4 in 10 questionnaires were missing in another.

4 studiesHomeopathic arnica 30c, 12 CH, D4; arnica tablets (Mawardi).

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Robertson 2007: 190 adults after tonsillectomy took arnica 30c or placebo; of 111 who returned questionnaires, pain scores fell by 28.3 with arnica and 23.8 with placebo (p<0.05); painkiller use did not differ. Makary 2026: 10 people each had two wisdom-tooth operations (arnica 12 CH then placebo); pain was lower on days 1 to 5 and swelling lower on day 2, mouth opening not significantly different. Mawardi 2020: 23 patients, not randomised, arnica tablets vs a control group; day 2 pain 3.09 vs 4.75. Karow 2008: 88 patients after bunion surgery; arnica D4 was equivalent to diclofenac for redness, swelling, heat and mobility, but inferior for pain, and was better tolerated (4.5% vs 20.45% intolerance).

Results

Small pain benefits in small or flawed studies; equivalent to diclofenac on wound signs but worse for pain.

Effect sizes as reported

Robertson: 28.3 vs 23.8 fall in pain score (p<0.05). Karow: pain inferior to diclofenac.

Why this rating

Mixed designs; 41.6% missing data in one trial; one 10-person trial; one non-randomised.

Form and dose studied

Homeopathic arnica 30c, 12 CH, D4; arnica tablets (Mawardi).

Who was studied

Adults after throat, tooth or foot surgery.

Limits

Small, variable, one without randomisation.

Why researchers looked

Pain after surgery is a common reason to try an add-on remedy.

Traditional use

Homeopathic arnica is made from the arnica plant and is used by people who follow homeopathy for bruises and injuries. The EU herbal committee says homeopathic preparations are completely different from the herbal preparations it assessed (EMA).

Proposed mechanism Pharmacological theory

There is no accepted explanation for how very high dilutions might work. Lab and animal work on arnica compounds (helenalin-type compounds) concerns the herbal extract, not homeopathic dilutions.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Safety is covered in the safety section. Homeopathic dilutions in tablets are generally mild, but swallowing a large amount of the pills by mistake caused serious illness in one reported case, and arnica plant material should not be swallowed.

39 29 30 24

Muscle soreness after long-distance running

Low certainty

A large trial of 519 runners found homeopathic arnica 30x did not reduce muscle soreness.

1 studiesHomeopathic arnica 30x.

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Vickers 1998: 519 runners expecting soreness took homeopathic arnica 30x or placebo; 400 gave results. Mean 2-day soreness was 45.2 mm with arnica and 41.0 mm with placebo; the 95% confidence interval ran from 8.81 mm in favour of placebo to 0.51 mm in favour of arnica. Race time did not differ.

Results

No benefit.

Effect sizes as reported

Difference 4.2 mm (CI -8.81 to 0.51 mm).

Why this rating

One large, double-blind trial with 21% missing results.

Form and dose studied

Homeopathic arnica 30x.

Who was studied

Long-distance runners.

Limits

One trial from 1998.

Why researchers looked

This trial tested whether arnica eases the soreness that follows a long race.

Traditional use

Homeopathic arnica is made from the arnica plant and is used by people who follow homeopathy for bruises and injuries. The EU herbal committee says homeopathic preparations are completely different from the herbal preparations it assessed (EMA).

Proposed mechanism Pharmacological theory

There is no accepted explanation for how very high dilutions might work. Lab and animal work on arnica compounds (helenalin-type compounds) concerns the herbal extract, not homeopathic dilutions.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Safety is covered in the safety section. Homeopathic dilutions in tablets are generally mild, but swallowing a large amount of the pills by mistake caused serious illness in one reported case, and arnica plant material should not be swallowed.

53

Bleeding after childbirth (arnica with Bellis perennis)

Very low certainty

In 40 women a combination of homeopathic arnica and Bellis perennis was linked to a smaller fall in haemoglobin after birth. This is preliminary and not about arnica alone.

1 studiesHomeopathic combination, C6 or C30.

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Oberbaum 2005: 40 women after birth were assigned to arnica C6 plus Bellis C6, arnica C30 plus Bellis C30, or double placebo. At 72 hours haemoglobin was 12.7 to 12.4 in the treated women versus 12.7 to 11.6 with placebo (p<0.05). The paper reports preliminary results.

Results

Smaller haemoglobin fall in a small preliminary trial.

Effect sizes as reported

Mean difference -0.29 (95% CI -1.09 to 0.52) treated vs -1.18 (95% CI -1.82 to -0.54) placebo.

Why this rating

40 women, a two-herb combination, preliminary results.

Form and dose studied

Homeopathic combination, C6 or C30.

Who was studied

Women after childbirth.

Limits

Preliminary; combination.

Why researchers looked

Arnica is used for bruising, and this trial tested whether it changes blood loss after birth.

Traditional use

Homeopathic arnica is made from the arnica plant and is used by people who follow homeopathy for bruises and injuries. The EU herbal committee says homeopathic preparations are completely different from the herbal preparations it assessed (EMA).

Proposed mechanism Pharmacological theory

There is no accepted explanation for how very high dilutions might work. Lab and animal work on arnica compounds (helenalin-type compounds) concerns the herbal extract, not homeopathic dilutions.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Safety is covered in the safety section. Homeopathic dilutions in tablets are generally mild, but swallowing a large amount of the pills by mistake caused serious illness in one reported case, and arnica plant material should not be swallowed.

35

Bleeding and blood clotting

Low certainty

A homeopathic arnica and Bryonia combination did not reduce bleeding after heart-valve surgery, and homeopathic arnica did not change clotting tests in healthy volunteers.

2 studiesHomeopathic arnica or arnica plus Bryonia.

Studies, doses and limits

What the trials found

Cornu 2010: 92 adults having aortic valve surgery took a homeopathic combination of arnica and Bryonia alba or placebo from a day before to 4 days after surgery. Blood loss in drains did not differ at 12 h (P=0.19), 24 h (P=0.23) or at drain removal (P=0.35); CRP, troponin, temperature, pain and transfusions did not differ. Baillargeon 1993: a crossover trial in healthy volunteers found no significant effect of homeopathic arnica on bleeding time or other clotting tests just after dosing. Neither trial tested herbal arnica.

Results

No effect on bleeding or clotting in either trial.

Effect sizes as reported

Cornu: 362 vs 456 mL at 12 h (P=0.19).

Why this rating

One combination trial in surgery and a brief report in healthy volunteers.

Form and dose studied

Homeopathic arnica or arnica plus Bryonia.

Who was studied

Heart-surgery patients; healthy volunteers.

Limits

Does not apply to herbal arnica.

Why researchers looked

People ask whether arnica thins the blood or helps bleeding, so the studies looked at both.

Traditional use

Homeopathic arnica is made from the arnica plant and is used by people who follow homeopathy for bruises and injuries. The EU herbal committee says homeopathic preparations are completely different from the herbal preparations it assessed (EMA).

Proposed mechanism Pharmacological theory

There is no accepted explanation for how very high dilutions might work. Lab and animal work on arnica compounds (helenalin-type compounds) concerns the herbal extract, not homeopathic dilutions.

A proposed mechanism does not show that the effect happens in people.

Safety is covered in the safety section. Homeopathic dilutions in tablets are generally mild, but swallowing a large amount of the pills by mistake caused serious illness in one reported case, and arnica plant material should not be swallowed.

9 4

Connections to the rest of health

How Arnica connects to the rest of our health knowledge graph. Every link says what kind of connection it is. A safety link (for example to the liver) is a warning, not a benefit. A study that merely mentions a topic never creates a benefit link.

Explore every connection: goals, body systems, organs, symptoms, genes

A. Wellness goals

Connected toKind of connectionEvidence statusContextStudies
Joint Support Demonstrated clinical effect Moderate certainty Osteoarthritis of the finger joints: arnica gel compared with ibuprofen gel: One 3-week trial of 204 people found arnica gel eased pain and improved hand function about as much as ibuprofen gel. There was no placebo gel, so it does not prove arnica beats placebo. 54 7 46
Inflammation Balance Demonstrated clinical effect Moderate certainty Osteoarthritis of the finger joints: arnica gel compared with ibuprofen gel: One 3-week trial of 204 people found arnica gel eased pain and improved hand function about as much as ibuprofen gel. There was no placebo gel, so it does not prove arnica beats placebo. 54 7 46
Joint Support Potential benefit Very low certainty Knee osteoarthritis: fresh-plant arnica gel (open trial): In an open trial with no comparison group, 79 people using arnica gel for 6 weeks had lower knee-pain and stiffness scores. Without a control group this cannot show the gel was the cause. Knee swelling after knee surgery: Three trials in 319 people after knee operations found a trend to less swelling with homeopathic arnica 30x, but only the smallest-effect trial of the three, in cruciate ligament repair, was significant. 25 46 6
Muscle Recovery Potential benefit Mixed findings Muscle soreness after hard exercise: arnica on the skin: Two small trials in healthy people give different answers: one found less pain three days after hard running, the other found more pain a day after calf exercises. A mud pack with menthol and arnica helped soreness in 10 men, but menthol may be the reason. Bruising, swelling and pain after surgery: arnica creams and ointments: A large trial found arnica ointment did nothing after eyelid surgery, but two trials without a placebo (nose surgery and wisdom-tooth surgery) found less bruising, swelling or pain than with no cream. 37 1 5 57 45 2 18 11 17 47 20 6 48 55 21 39 29 30 24 53
Physical Stamina Potential benefit Mixed findings Muscle soreness after hard exercise: arnica on the skin: Two small trials in healthy people give different answers: one found less pain three days after hard running, the other found more pain a day after calf exercises. A mud pack with menthol and arnica helped soreness in 10 men, but menthol may be the reason. 37 1 5
Healthy Skin Potential benefit Mixed findings Bruises made by a laser or after laser treatment: In one trial 20% arnica ointment cleared laser-made bruises better than plain petrolatum. A second trial, using arnica gel on face bruises after laser, found no difference from the plain base. Skin infection with Leishmania parasites: arnica tincture (early trial): In a small open trial of 16 people, all 12 who finished follow-up were healed after 30 or 45 days of arnica tincture on the lesion. There was no comparison group. 28 3 42 40 22 44 26 8 51 49
Inflammation Balance Potential benefit Mixed findings Bruising, swelling and pain after surgery: arnica creams and ointments: A large trial found arnica ointment did nothing after eyelid surgery, but two trials without a placebo (nose surgery and wisdom-tooth surgery) found less bruising, swelling or pain than with no cream. Homeopathic arnica after surgery: reviews of the trials: Two reviews of trials of homeopathic arnica around surgery found a small or no benefit over placebo. The newer meta-analysis found a small effect that did not reach statistical significance against placebo. 57 45 2 18 11 17 47 20
Muscle Recovery Traditional use Not enough evidence Bruises, sprains and local muscle pain: the traditional use and what reviews say: The EU lists arnica flower skin products as a traditional medicine for bruises, sprains and local muscle pain, on the basis of long use. Reviews of the trials call the evidence mixed or too thin to confirm it. 13 14 12 18 49 50 47 46 20 42
Joint Support Traditional use Not enough evidence Bruises, sprains and local muscle pain: the traditional use and what reviews say: The EU lists arnica flower skin products as a traditional medicine for bruises, sprains and local muscle pain, on the basis of long use. Reviews of the trials call the evidence mixed or too thin to confirm it. 13 14 12 18 49 50 47 46 20 42
Inflammation Balance Traditional use Not enough evidence Bruises, sprains and local muscle pain: the traditional use and what reviews say: The EU lists arnica flower skin products as a traditional medicine for bruises, sprains and local muscle pain, on the basis of long use. Reviews of the trials call the evidence mixed or too thin to confirm it. 13 14 12 18 49 50 47 46 20 42
Immune Support Potential benefit Very low certainty Skin infection with Leishmania parasites: arnica tincture (early trial): In a small open trial of 16 people, all 12 who finished follow-up were healed after 30 or 45 days of arnica tincture on the lesion. There was no comparison group. 40 22
Endurance Support Potential benefit Low certainty Muscle soreness after long-distance running: A large trial of 519 runners found homeopathic arnica 30x did not reduce muscle soreness. 53
Womens Wellness Potential benefit Very low certainty Bleeding after childbirth (arnica with Bellis perennis): In 40 women a combination of homeopathic arnica and Bellis perennis was linked to a smaller fall in haemoglobin after birth. This is preliminary and not about arnica alone. 35
Heart Health Biological association Low certainty Bleeding and blood clotting: A homeopathic arnica and Bryonia combination did not reduce bleeding after heart-valve surgery, and homeopathic arnica did not change clotting tests in healthy volunteers. 9 4

B. Body systems

Connected toKind of connectionEvidence statusContextStudies
Cardiovascular system Drug or supplement interaction Very low certainty A test-tube antiplatelet effect and one case report of a high INR with heavy topical use; no established interaction.
Preparation or compound: Arnica flower extract with anticoagulant drugs
14 41
Reproductive system Contraindication Not enough evidence Safety is not established; use is not recommended (EMA).
Preparation or compound: Arnica products in pregnancy and breastfeeding
15 14
Musculoskeletal System Biological association Moderate certainty Studied for: Osteoarthritis of the finger joints: arnica gel compared with ibuprofen gel Studied for: Knee osteoarthritis: fresh-plant arnica gel (open trial) 54 7 46 25 37 1 5 57 45 2 18 13 14 12 49 50 47 20 42 11 17 6 39 29 30 24 53
Integumentary System Biological association Mixed findings Studied for: Bruises made by a laser or after laser treatment Studied for: Bruising, swelling and pain after surgery: arnica creams and ointments 28 3 42 57 45 2 18 13 14 12 49 50 47 46 20 40 22 11 17 44 26 8 51 48 55 21
Immune System Biological association Very low certainty Studied for: Skin infection with Leishmania parasites: arnica tincture (early trial) 40 22
Cardiovascular System Biological association Mixed findings Studied for: Pain and bruising after hand surgery and varicose vein surgery Studied for: Bleeding and blood clotting 48 55 21 9 4
Nervous System Biological association Low certainty Studied for: Pain after tonsil, tooth and foot surgery 39 29 30 24
Reproductive System Biological association Very low certainty Studied for: Bleeding after childbirth (arnica with Bellis perennis) 35

C. Body parts and organs

Connected toKind of connectionEvidence statusContextStudies
Skin Adverse effect or risk Moderate certainty Allergic contact dermatitis is documented in patch-test series and case reports; frequency is not known (EMA).
Preparation or compound: Arnica flower tincture, gel or cream; helenalin-type sesquiterpene lactones
15 38 19
Heart Adverse effect or risk Very low certainty Fast or slow heart rate and collapse after swallowing arnica are quoted in the EU report from older sources.
Preparation or compound: Swallowed arnica plant products; helenalin
14 34
Gut Adverse effect or risk Very low certainty Severe gastroenteritis after swallowing, quoted in EU and cosmetic safety reports.
Preparation or compound: Swallowed arnica plant products
14 34

E. Health conditions

Connected toKind of connectionEvidence statusContextStudies
Daisy-family plant allergy Contraindication Moderate certainty The EU monograph lists allergy to arnica or other Asteraceae as a contraindication; patch-test studies show cross-reaction.
Preparation or compound: Arnica flower products
15 36

I. Biomarkers

Connected toKind of connectionEvidence statusContextStudies
Pain score (visual scale or WOMAC pain) Biological association Low certainty Measured in trials: mixed. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 54 37 1 2
WOMAC total score (knee) Biological association Very low certainty Measured in trials: lowered. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 25
Hand function score Biological association Moderate certainty Measured in trials: no-change. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 54 7
Bruise score (rater or photograph) Biological association Low certainty Measured in trials: mixed. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 28 3 57
Swelling (oedema) after surgery Biological association Low certainty Measured in trials: mixed. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 45 2 57
C-reactive protein (CRP) Biological association Very low certainty Measured in trials: no-change. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 37
Creatine kinase (CK) and myoglobin Biological association Very low certainty Measured in trials: no-change. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 37
Complete healing of skin lesions (leishmaniasis) Biological association Very low certainty Measured in trials: raised. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 40
Knee circumference after surgery Biological association Low certainty Measured in trials: mixed. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 6
Bruise area and colour after face surgery Biological association Low certainty Measured in trials: mixed. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 44 26 8
Pain after surgery (scores and painkillers) Biological association Low certainty Measured in trials: mixed. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 39 48 29
Haemoglobin after childbirth Biological association Very low certainty Measured in trials: mixed. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 35
Blood in surgical drains Biological association Low certainty Measured in trials: no-change. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 9
Bleeding time and clotting tests Biological association Low certainty Measured in trials: no-change. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 4
C-reactive protein (CRP) after heart surgery Biological association Low certainty Measured in trials: no-change. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 9
Muscle soreness (VAS) after running Biological association Low certainty Measured in trials: no-change. A lab change is not the same as a health benefit. 53

J. Genes, receptors and enzymes

Connected toKind of connectionEvidence statusContextStudies
NF-kappa B (p65 subunit) Preliminary mechanism In vitro Helenalin-type lactones bind and block p65 in cells; lab work only. 31 27
NF-AT Preliminary mechanism In vitro A second transcription factor inhibited by the lactones in the lab. 31
Liver cytochrome P450 enzymes Preliminary mechanism Animal Lowered by injected helenalin in mice, quoted in the EU report. 14

K. Biological pathways

Connected toKind of connectionEvidence statusContextStudies
Platelet activation (ADP pathway) Preliminary mechanism In vitro Reduced by an arnica phenolic extract in the test tube. 41

L. Active compounds

Connected toKind of connectionEvidence statusContextStudies
Helenalin and its esters (e.g. helenalin isobutyrate, 6-O-acetylhelenalin) Biological association In vitro Blocks the inflammation switch NF-kappa B in cells by binding its p65 part; also the main allergen and toxic compound. Related esters: helenalin acetate PubChem CID 442142; helenalin isobutyrate CID 9996862.
Preparation or compound: Flower head
31 27 10 43 33 14
11,13-dihydrohelenalin and its esters (plenolin) Biological association In vitro Anti-inflammatory in lab tests, less potent than helenalin esters in some tests (Schmidt 2023); also a skin sensitiser.
Preparation or compound: Flower head
43 33 14
Thymol and thymol derivatives Biological association Authoritative guidance Named in the EU report as part of the flower's volatile oil. No arnica-specific activity read.
Preparation or compound: Flower head
14 33
Scopoletin Biological association Authoritative guidance Named in the EU report as a flower constituent. No arnica-specific activity read.
Preparation or compound: Flower head
14 33
Umbelliferone Biological association Authoritative guidance Named in the EU report as a flower constituent. No arnica-specific activity read.
Preparation or compound: Flower head
14 33
Flavonoids and phenolic acids Biological association In vitro An arnica flower extract rich in phenolic acids reduced platelet clumping in the test tube. Flavonols were linked to an extract's positive Ames test in an old study quoted by the EU report. No single compound identified.
Preparation or compound: Flower head
41 14

Each connection is stored with the ingredient, the connected record, the kind of connection, the evidence status, the supporting studies, the preparation or compound involved, and a review date (last reviewed October 25, 2026).

Evidence at a glance: what changed in 16 lab markers

Tap a number to show only those markers. Counts are markers, not people.

The evidence

The research centre for Arnica. Every record here was checked against PubMed or the publisher's page; we never list a study we have not verified.

Evidence by outcome

Bars show how many studies we found for each outcome, not how well it works. People are added up across trials only (reviews are not added, to avoid double counting).

How we rate evidence

High certainty

Several well-run trials or reviews agree; further research is unlikely to change the picture much.

Moderate certainty

Good trials point the same way, but some doubt remains.

Low certainty

Small, short or inconsistent trials. The finding could change with better research.

Very low certainty

Very little or very weak human data. Treat as a possibility only.

Mixed findings

Trials or reviews disagree with each other.

Not enough evidence

Not enough human research to say either way.

Evidence against

Good research found no benefit, or found harm.

We take the reviewers' own risk-of-bias and GRADE statements where they exist, and otherwise judge from study size, design, consistency, directness and whether a product matches what is sold. Many publications do not make evidence high. Method note: We searched PubMed, read the EU draft herbal monograph, the final 2014 monograph, the draft assessment report and the public summary from the European Medicines Agency, and checked plant names in GBIF and the NCBI taxonomy and compounds in PubChem. Each cited study was looked up in PubMed and its abstract read; where only an abstract was read, numbers come from it alone. Certainty ratings are ours, using plain categories, except that we follow the Cochrane review for the hand osteoarthritis comparison.

Study library: every study we checked 57
StudyDesignPeopleProduct, dose, lengthResult
Adkison 2010
The effect of topical arnica on muscle pain.
Ann Pharmacother · PMID 20807867 · DOI
Rct (double blind, placebo controlled, split body)
53
53 volunteers; leg pain after standardised calf raises
Topical arnica montana cream (strength not stated in abstract)
applied after exercise and at 24 and 48 hours 72 hours of pain scores · vs placebo cream on the other leg
Pain at 24 hours was higher with arnica than placebo (3.04 vs 2.36, p<0.005). No difference at days 3 and 4, in tenderness or in ankle range of motion.
Arnica leg was more painful at 24 hours; no benefit at other times
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Pain scale (leg pain), muscle tenderness, ankle range of motion

Limitations: Healthy volunteers, single exercise bout. The authors suggest a possible irritant effect but this was not tested.

Read: abstract

Akay 2024
Can Topical Agents (Arnica and Mucopolysaccharide Polysulfate) Reduce Postoperative Pain, Edema and Trismus Following Mandibular Third Molar Surgery?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg · PMID 37913818 · DOI
Rct (three arm, standard therapy controlled)
60
60 people after lower wisdom-tooth removal
Topical arnica added to standard care (antibiotic plus anti-inflammatory tablets)
10 days (checks at days 1, 3, 5, 10) · vs standard care alone; standard care plus polysulfate cream
Arnica and polysulfate groups felt less pain than standard care alone up to day 5 (P<0.05). Mouth opening was better with arnica on days 1, 3 and 5. Swelling was lower with polysulfate (not arnica).
Less pain and stiffness of the jaw than standard care alone
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Pain (cm on a visual scale), mouth opening (trismus), swelling

Limitations: No placebo; 60 people; patients knew their treatment.

Read: abstract

Alonso 2002
Effects of topical arnica gel on post-laser treatment bruises.
Dermatol Surg · PMID 12174058 · DOI
Rct (double blind, placebo controlled, split face)
19
19 patients with facial thread veins treated by pulsed-dye laser
Topical arnica gel with vehicle (strength not stated in abstract)
twice daily 2 weeks before or 2 weeks after laser · vs vehicle alone on the other side of the face
No difference between arnica and vehicle, before the laser (P=0.496) or after it (P=0.359).
No difference
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Bruising on a visual analog scale, rated by patient and physicians

Limitations: Very small groups.

Read: abstract

Baillargeon 1993
[The effects of Arnica Montana on blood coagulation. Randomized controlled trial].
Can Fam Physician · PMID 7903572
Crossover rct
Healthy volunteers Homeopathic Arnica montana
whole plant (homeopathic) · vs placebo
No significant effect on bleeding time or other clotting tests in healthy volunteers just after dosing.
No effect
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Bleeding time and clotting tests

Limitations: Brief abstract; number of people not given.

Read: abstract

Bartolomei 2022
Mud Pack With Menthol and Arnica Montana Accelerates Recovery Following a High-Volume Resistance Training Session for Lower Body in Trained Men.
J Strength Cond Res · PMID 32956264 · DOI
Rct (crossover, placebo controlled)
10
10 resistance-trained men after a high-volume leg workout
Mud pack containing menthol and Arnica montana (a combination product, so the effect cannot be put down to arnica alone)
applied 4 times over 45 hours (amount not stated in abstract) 48 hours · vs placebo pack
Soreness (VAS) and one slow-speed strength test favoured the mud pack; jump power, isometric squat and muscle thickness did not differ.
Small improvements in soreness and one strength measure
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Strength, muscle thickness, soreness (VAS)

Limitations: Combination with menthol and mud; 10 men; arnica effect cannot be separated.

Read: abstract

Brinkhaus 2006
Homeopathic arnica therapy in patients receiving knee surgery: results of three randomised double-blind trials.
Complement Ther Med · PMID 17105693 · DOI
Rct (three double blind, placebo controlled trials)
319
227 people having knee arthroscopy, 35 having knee replacement, 57 having cruciate ligament repair
Homeopathic arnica 30x (1:10^30 dilution)
whole plant (homeopathic) 5 globules before surgery, then 15 globules daily after surgery, day 1 or 2 measure · vs placebo
Arthroscopy: difference -0.25% (95% CI -0.85 to 0.41); knee replacement: -1.68% (95% CI -4.24 to 0.77); cruciate repair: -1.80% (95% CI -3.30 to -0.30, p=0.019). Only the cruciate trial was significant.
Significant only in the smallest-effect trial of three (cruciate repair)
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Knee circumference after surgery relative to before

Limitations: Three small sequential trials, one significant result.

Read: abstract

Cameron 2013
Topical herbal therapies for treating osteoarthritis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev · PMID 23728701 · DOI
Systematic review (Cochrane)
785
People with osteoarthritis; 7 trials of topical plant products, 785 participants
Topical herbal products; arnica gel in one trial
various · vs placebo or active comparator
For hand osteoarthritis, one trial of 174 people gave moderate-certainty evidence that arnica gel probably gives similar benefit to ibuprofen gel: pain difference -3.8 points on a 100-point scale (95% CI -10.1 to 2.5); adverse events 13% vs 8% (RR 1.65, 95% CI 0.72 to 3.76).
Similar to ibuprofen gel; no placebo comparison
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Pain and function

Limitations: Single trial per product; no pooling. Only the opening part of the abstract was read for the arnica result.

Read: abstract

Chaiet 2016
Perioperative Arnica montana for Reduction of Ecchymosis in Rhinoplasty Surgery.
Ann Plast Surg · PMID 25954844 · DOI
Rct (double blind, placebo controlled)
22
22 people having a nose job (rhinoplasty) with bone cuts
Oral Arnica montana (a named commercial product)
up to 9 to 10 days · vs placebo
9 on arnica and 13 on placebo. Bruise extent was 16.2%, 32.9% and 20.4% smaller; significant on day 7 (P=0.097). The authors set the significance cut-off at P<0.1, looser than the usual 0.05. One person had itching and rash.
Smaller bruises on day 7 at a loose significance level
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Bruise extent and colour on photographs

Limitations: Very small; significance threshold was set at P<0.1.

Read: abstract

Cornu 2010
No effect of a homoeopathic combination of Arnica montana and Bryonia alba on bleeding, inflammation, and ischaemia after aortic valve surgery.
Br J Clin Pharmacol · PMID 20233176 · DOI
Rct (double blind, placebo controlled)
92
92 adults having heart-valve surgery
Homeopathic combination of Arnica montana and Bryonia alba
whole plant (homeopathic) 1 day before to 4 days after surgery · vs placebo
No difference in blood loss at 12 hours, 24 hours or drain removal (P=0.19, 0.23, 0.35), nor in CRP, pain, troponin or transfusions.
No effect
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Blood and fluid in the chest drains; CRP; pain; troponin

Limitations: A combination product, so it says little about arnica on its own.

Read: abstract

Drogosz 2019
Helenalin - A Sesquiterpene Lactone with Multidirectional Activity.
Curr Drug Targets · PMID 30317996 · DOI
Narrative review
in-vitro
Helenalin, the main active compound of arnica Helenalin (isolated compound)
flower head
Review says helenalin is strongly anti-inflammatory, but its allergic reactions and toxicity to healthy tissues have so far stopped it being developed as a drug.
Helenalin: potent but toxic
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Activity, mechanisms and toxicity of helenalin

Limitations: Review of mostly lab work.

Read: abstract

Ernst 1998
Efficacy of homeopathic arnica: a systematic review of placebo-controlled clinical trials.
Arch Surg · PMID 9820349 · DOI
Systematic review
8 placebo-controlled trials of homeopathic arnica, mostly after tissue injury Homeopathic arnica
whole plant (homeopathic) various various · vs placebo
Most trials had serious method problems. On balance they did not suggest homeopathic arnica works better than placebo.
Not better than placebo
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Pain, bruising, swelling

Limitations: Old search (1998); the trials since then are not included.

Read: abstract

European Medicines Agency 2014
Community herbal monograph on Arnica montana L., flos (final, EMA/HMPC/198793/2012)
EMA · Source
Authoritative guidance
Adults, adolescents and children over 3 years (topical use) Arnica flower tinctures and liquid extracts for the skin
flower head
Adopted 6 May 2014. Traditional use for relief of bruises, sprains and localised muscle pain. Contraindicated in hypersensitivity to arnica or other Asteraceae (Compositae). Not for broken skin. Not recommended in pregnancy. Allergic reactions (itching, redness, eczema), frequency not known. No interactions reported.
Traditional herbal medicine, skin use only
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Traditional use, warnings and side effects

Limitations: Traditional use, not based on clinical trial proof.

Read: full-text

European Medicines Agency 2016
Herbal medicine: summary for the public. Arnica flower (EMA/654173/2016)
EMA · Source
Authoritative guidance
General public Arnica flower skin preparations
flower head
HMPC concluded these skin preparations can be used for bruises, sprains and localised muscle pain on the basis of long-standing use. Use only from age 12 in that summary. See a doctor if symptoms last longer than 3 to 4 days. Allergic reactions such as itching, redness and eczema, frequency unknown. Insufficient clinical-trial evidence; studies had small numbers and lack of controls.
Traditional use only
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Plain summary of HMPC conclusions

Limitations: Public summary dated 2016, earlier than the 2025 draft.

Read: full-text

European Medicines Agency 2025
Assessment report on Arnica montana L., flos (Draft, Revision 1, EMA/HMPC/432016/2024)
EMA · Source
Authoritative guidance
Reports and papers reviewed by the HMPC Arnica flower preparations
flower head
Says the HMPC saw clinical studies of arnica for bruises and joint or soft-tissue pain but firm conclusions could not be drawn, so use rests on tradition. Says arnica preparations can cause toxicity when taken by mouth and should not be used internally (no tea for drinking); internal use is obsolete. Quotes the Commission E and other texts on serious effects after swallowing (gastroenteritis, fast or slow heart rate, collapse, muscle paralysis, death), serious but non-fatal symptoms after 30 mL of a 20% tincture, a 9-day-old breastfed baby with haemolytic anaemia after the mother drank arnica flower tea, 96 spontaneous reports to EudraVigilance (mostly skin reactions) and one case report of high INR in a woman on warfarin using a large amount of topical arnica (original paper not read).
Authoritative review of tradition and safety
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Efficacy evidence, toxicology, case reports, pharmacovigilance

Limitations: Draft; several sources are quoted second-hand and were not opened by us.

Read: full-text

European Medicines Agency 2025
European Union herbal monograph on Arnica montana L., flos (Draft, Revision 1, EMA/HMPC/524586/2024)
EMA · Source
Authoritative guidance
Adolescents and adults (some preparations children over 3 years; not under 12 for oil and some extracts) Arnica flower infusion, tincture, fluid extract and sunflower-oil extract for the skin
flower head
Draft dated 19 March 2025, consultation 15 April to 15 July 2025; final adoption not confirmed by us. Adds indications for insect-bite inflammation and small boils. Contraindicated in hypersensitivity to arnica or other Asteraceae. Do not use on broken skin or near eyes and mucous membranes; tincture must be diluted; see a doctor if symptoms last 3 to 4 days. Pregnancy and breastfeeding use not recommended. Allergic reactions, frequency not known. No overdose cases reported. No reproductive, genotoxicity or carcinogenicity tests done.
Draft: topical traditional use
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Traditional use, warnings, side effects, pregnancy

Limitations: Draft, not final.

Read: full-text

GBIF Secretariat 2026
GBIF Backbone Taxonomy: Arnica montana L. (usageKey 5405976)
GBIF API · Source
Database
not applicable not applicable
flower head
Accepted species, family Asteraceae, order Asterales; published in Species Plantarum page 884 (1753). Synonyms listed include Arnica helvetica G.Don ex Loudon and Arnica plantaginifolia Gilib.
Name verified
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Accepted name, family, synonyms and common names

Limitations: Common names are as returned by the API.

Read: full-text

Gaertner 2021
Is Homeopathic Arnica Effective for Postoperative Recovery? A Meta-analysis of Placebo-Controlled and Active Comparator Trials.
Front Surg · PMID 34977136 · DOI
Meta analysis (PROSPERO CRD42020131300)
23 publications, 28 comparisons; surgery patients Homeopathic Arnica montana (dilutions) versus placebo or an active drug
whole plant (homeopathic) various dilutions various · vs placebo (18 comparisons), active drug (9), no treatment (1)
Placebo-controlled trials: Hedges g 0.18 (95% CI -0.007 to 0.373; p=0.059), which crosses zero. Active-comparator trials g 0.26, mainly from non-randomised studies; in randomised trials the effect moved towards zero.
Small, not statistically significant against placebo
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Inflammatory signs after surgery, e.g. bruising and swelling

Limitations: Authors say small effect; one author is a homeopathy-trained doctor (declared).

Funding and conflicts: One author is a doctor trained in homeopathy; the others declare no conflicts.

Registration: CRD42020131300

Read: abstract

Ho 2016
Is There a Role for Arnica and Bromelain in Prevention of Post-Procedure Ecchymosis or Edema? A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Dermatol Surg · PMID 27035499 · DOI
Systematic review
Trials of arnica or bromelain for bruising or swelling after skin procedures Arnica (11 oral trials and 2 topical trials) and bromelain
mixed various · vs various
Mixed results: arnica improved things in 4 of 13 randomised trials. The authors found insufficient data to support arnica or bromelain after procedures.
Insufficient data
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Bruising (ecchymosis) and swelling after cosmetic, laser or surgical skin procedures

Limitations: Trials differed in product, dose and measure; search ran to March 2015.

Read: abstract

Hörmann 1995
Allergie acute contact dermatitis due to Arnica tincture self-medication.
Phytomedicine · PMID 23196021 · DOI
Case report
1
66-year-old with rosacea
Arnica tincture used on the skin
flower head (tincture) repeated use, then a single application
Acute blistering allergic contact dermatitis after one application of arnica tincture to the back of the hand; delayed-type contact allergy proven by patch test.
One case
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Skin reaction

Limitations: One case.

Read: abstract

Iannitti 2016
Effectiveness and Safety of Arnica montana in Post-Surgical Setting, Pain and Inflammation.
Am J Ther · PMID 25171757 · DOI
Narrative review
Papers on arnica in pain and after surgery Arnica montana, mainly homeopathic
various · vs various
The review says arnica was more effective than placebo for several conditions and may be an alternative to anti-inflammatory drugs in some. It also says doses and preparations differed widely and gave different results.
Favourable overall; not a systematic or graded review
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Pain, swelling and bruising after injury or surgery

Limitations: Narrative review, not a systematic search; conclusions are more positive than the systematic reviews. Authors include people linked to homeopathy (not detailed in abstract).

Read: abstract

Jeffrey 2002
Use of Arnica to relieve pain after carpal-tunnel release surgery.
Altern Ther Health Med · PMID 11892685
Rct (double blind)
37
37 patients having keyhole release of both wrists for carpal tunnel
Homeopathic arnica tablets plus herbal arnica ointment (a combination of two forms)
whole plant (tablets) and flower head (ointment) 2 weeks · vs placebos
No difference in grip strength or wrist size. Pain was lower at 2 weeks in the arnica group (P<0.03).
Lower pain at week 2 only
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Grip strength, wrist size, pain at 1 and 2 weeks

Limitations: Two forms given together; 37 people.

Read: abstract

Jürgens 2022
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic and Toxicological Parameters of Arnica Tincture after Dermal Application In Vivo.
Pharmaceutics · PMID 36365196 · DOI
Animal toxicology and absorption study
animal
Rats; dermal toxicity tests Arnica tincture applied to the skin
flower head (tincture) 1.0 mg of sesquiterpene lactones (absorption test) acute and repeated dermal dosing
84% of the applied sesquiterpene lactones were absorbed into skin but blood, urine and faeces held less than 0.3 ng/mL. No irritation, corrosion or dermal toxicity at the amounts needed for the leishmaniasis use. The authors expect no toxicity other than the known sensitisation.
No systemic toxicity expected from skin use in rats
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Absorption into blood, urine and faeces; skin irritation; dermal toxicity

Limitations: Rats, not people; one tincture.

Read: abstract

Jürgens 2022
Dermal Absorption of Sesquiterpene Lactones from Arnica Tincture.
Pharmaceutics · PMID 35456576 · DOI
In vitro skin absorption study
in-vitro
Pig skin and two human skin samples in a lab diffusion chamber Arnica tincture
flower head (tincture) 48 hours
Within 48 hours at most 8.4% (pig), 14.6% (human skin A) and 36.4% (more permeable human skin B) passed through; over 97% entered the skin and much was bound to skin proteins.
More passes through more permeable skin
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: How much of the helenalin-type compounds crossed the skin

Limitations: Lab skin samples, not living people.

Read: abstract

Karow 2008
Efficacy of Arnica montana D4 for healing of wounds after Hallux valgus surgery compared to diclofenac.
J Altern Complement Med · PMID 18199022 · DOI
Rct (double blind, equivalence)
88
88 patients 4 days after bunion (hallux valgus) surgery
Arnica D4 (homeopathic) pillules versus diclofenac
whole plant (homeopathic) 10 pillules 3 times daily (versus diclofenac 50 mg 3 times daily) 4 days · vs diclofenac sodium
Arnica D4 was equivalent to diclofenac for wound redness, swelling, heat and mobility, but inferior for pain. Intolerance was reported by 2 people (4.5%) on arnica and 9 (20.45%) on diclofenac.
Equivalent on wound signs; inferior for pain
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Wound irritation, mobility, pain, painkiller use

Limitations: No placebo group; 4 days only. Funding not stated in the abstract.

Read: abstract

Knuesel 2002
Arnica montana gel in osteoarthritis of the knee: an open, multicenter clinical trial.
Adv Ther · PMID 12539881 · DOI
Open label single arm trial
79
26 men and 53 women with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis
Arnica montana fresh-plant gel
flower head (fresh plant gel) applied twice daily (amount not stated in abstract) 6 weeks (checks at 3 and 6 weeks)
WOMAC total scores fell at 3 and 6 weeks (both P<0.0001). Local adverse events 7.6%, including one allergic reaction. 87% rated tolerability good or fairly good.
Significant fall in median WOMAC scores; no effect size with confidence interval in the abstract
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: WOMAC total, pain, stiffness and function scores

Limitations: No control group and no blinding, so natural change and expectation cannot be separated from the gel.

Read: abstract

Kotlus 2010
Evaluation of homeopathic Arnica montana for ecchymosis after upper blepharoplasty: a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 20683279 · DOI
Rct (double blind, placebo controlled, each person tested both ways)
People having upper eyelid surgery on each side at least a month apart Homeopathic Arnica montana
whole plant (homeopathic) days 3 and 7 assessed · vs placebo
No difference in bruise area, severity rank, ease of recovery or speed of resolution.
No difference
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Area and severity rank of bruising

Limitations: Number of patients not given in the abstract.

Read: abstract

Lass 2008
Anti-inflammatory and immune-regulatory mechanisms prevent contact hypersensitivity to Arnica montana L.
Exp Dermatol · PMID 18341569 · DOI
Animal and in vitro immunology study
animal
Mice and dendritic cells Arnica tinctures and sesquiterpene lactones
flower head (tincture) · vs TNCB (a strong skin allergen)
In normal mice arnica did not induce contact allergy and even suppressed allergy to a strong allergen; allergy could be induced in mice with a weakened immune system. At low doses the compounds stimulated immune cells.
Arnica did not cause allergy in healthy mice
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Contact allergy in mice

Limitations: Mouse model; human allergy is documented separately in patients.

Read: abstract

Leu 2010
Accelerated resolution of laser-induced bruising with topical 20% arnica: a rater-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Br J Dermatol · PMID 20412090 · DOI
Rct (double blind patient and rater, within person)
Healthy volunteers aged 21 to 65; four standard laser-made bruises per person Topical 20% arnica ointment (versus 5% vitamin K, 1% vitamin K with 0.3% retinol, and white petrolatum)
flower head (ointment) 20% arnica under occlusion, twice a day 2 weeks · vs white petrolatum; vitamin K preparations
Arnica improved the bruise score more than petrolatum (P=0.003) and more than 1% vitamin K plus 0.3% retinol (P=0.01), but not more than 5% vitamin K.
Mean bruise score improved more with 20% arnica than with petrolatum
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Rater score of bruise (0 to 10) from photographs at week 2

Limitations: Bruises were made on healthy skin by a laser, not real injuries; number of volunteers not given in the abstract.

Read: abstract

Makary 2026
Effect of Arnica Montana on postoperative edema, pain, and trismus following surgical extraction of impacted third molars: A double-blind clinical trial.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg · PMID 42173484 · DOI
Rct (double blind, crossover)
10
10 people each having two similar wisdom-tooth operations
Arnica montana 12 CH (homeopathic)
whole plant (homeopathic) from 1 day before to 7 days after surgery · vs placebo (at the second operation)
Pain was lower on days 1 to 5; fewer painkillers; swelling lower on day 2 only; mouth opening not significantly different.
Lower pain days 1 to 5; swelling on day 2
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Pain, mouth opening, facial measurements

Limitations: Only 10 people.

Funding and conflicts: No financial interests declared.

Read: abstract

Mawardi 2020
Systemic Use of Arnica Montana for the Reduction of Postsurgical Sequels following Extraction of Impacted Mandibular 3(rd) Molars: A Pilot Study.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med · PMID 33381206 · DOI
Case control pilot (not randomised)
23
23 people having impacted lower wisdom teeth removed (22 finished)
Arnica montana tablets (systemic; strength not stated)
as per manufacturer 7 days · vs control group without arnica
On day 2 pain scores were lower with arnica (3.09 vs 4.75). Bleeding, bruising, swelling and mouth opening were reported as significantly better.
Better on several measures at day 2
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Pain, bleeding, bruising, swelling, mouth opening

Limitations: Not randomised or blinded; small.

Read: abstract

Merfort 2003
[Arnica: new insights on the molecular mode of action of a traditional medicinal plant].
Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd · PMID 12808362 · DOI
Narrative review (German)
in-vitro
Mode of action of arnica sesquiterpene lactones Arnica flower sesquiterpene lactones
flower head
Sesquiterpene lactones block the transcription factors NF-kappa B and NF-AT at micromolar concentrations, which control many inflammation genes. The author says first clinical studies suggest they can support rheumatic treatment.
Lab mechanism
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Mechanism

Limitations: Lab-based review; clinical claim is preliminary.

Read: abstract

NCBI 2026
NCBI Taxonomy: Arnica montana (taxid 436207)
NCBI Taxonomy · Source
Database
not applicable not applicable
flower head
Active species-level record, eudicots, taxid 436207, confirmed through the E-utilities API.
Name verified
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Species record

Limitations: Basic record only.

Read: summary-only

NCBI PubChem 2026
PubChem compound records for arnica constituents (CIDs 23205, 442294, 442142, 9996862, 5280460, 5281426, 6989)
PubChem API · Source
Database
not applicable Helenalin, plenolin (11,13-dihydrohelenalin), 6-O-acetylhelenalin, helenalin isobutyrate, scopoletin, umbelliferone, thymol
flower head
CIDs and formulas confirmed through the PubChem property API.
Identifiers verified
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Identifier, formula and name checks

Limitations: Names matched by PubChem name search; plenolin is the PubChem title for 11,13-dihydrohelenalin.

Read: summary-only

No authors listed 2001
Final report on the safety assessment of Arnica montana extract and Arnica montana.
Int J Toxicol · PMID 11558636 · DOI
Safety assessment (cosmetic ingredient review)
Arnica montana extract and plant in cosmetics Arnica montana extract (dried flower heads)
flower head
Not toxic in acute animal tests, not irritating or phototoxic in mouse or guinea-pig skin, mutagenic in one Ames test (possibly from flavonoids), no carcinogenicity or reproductive data. Swallowing arnica products has caused severe gastroenteritis, nervousness, fast heart rate, muscle weakness and death. The panel judged the data insufficient to support safety in cosmetics.
Insufficient data to support safety in cosmetics
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Toxicity, irritation, sensitisation and safety

Limitations: Published 2001; since then more data exist.

Read: abstract

Oberbaum 2005
The effect of the homeopathic remedies Arnica montana and Bellis perennis on mild postpartum bleeding--a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study--preliminary results.
Complement Ther Med · PMID 16036165 · DOI
Rct (double blind, placebo controlled; preliminary results)
40
40 women after childbirth
Homeopathic Arnica montana C6 or C30 with Bellis perennis (a combination)
whole plant (homeopathic) C6 or C30 48 hours (arnica), then Bellis to end of lochia · vs double placebo
At 72 hours haemoglobin was 12.7 to 12.4 in the treated women and 12.7 to 11.6 in the placebo group (p<0.05).
Smaller fall in haemoglobin
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Haemoglobin at 48 and 72 hours

Limitations: Combination with Bellis; 40 women; preliminary.

Read: abstract

Paulsen 2008
Cosmetics and herbal remedies with Compositae plant extracts - are they tolerated by Compositae-allergic patients?
Contact Dermatitis · PMID 18154553 · DOI
Patch test study
Compositae-allergic patients (6 arnica-sensitive; 12 chamomile-sensitive) Arnica-based and chamomile-based products tested on the skin
flower head patch test
5 of 6 arnica-sensitive people reacted to arnica-based products. The authors advise Compositae-allergic people against topical Compositae products.
5 of 6 reacted
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Reactions to finished products

Limitations: Very small group.

Read: abstract

Pumpa 2014
The effects of topical Arnica on performance, pain and muscle damage after intense eccentric exercise.
Eur J Sport Sci · PMID 23947690 · DOI
Rct (double blind, placebo controlled)
20
20 well-trained young men; muscle soreness set off by downhill running
Topical arnica (product and strength not stated in abstract)
applied every 4 waking hours (amount not stated in abstract) 96 hours · vs placebo
Less pain by VAS and tenderness at 72 hours with arnica. No effect on any performance test or blood marker of muscle damage or inflammation.
Lower pain at 72 hours only; no change in markers
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Pain (VAS and tenderness), performance, blood markers (IL-1 beta, IL-6, TNF-alpha, CRP, myoglobin, creatine kinase)

Limitations: Only 20 men; many outcomes tested; pain gain seen at one time point.

Read: abstract

Reider 2001
The seamy side of natural medicines: contact sensitization to arnica (Arnica montana L.) and marigold (Calendula officinalis L.).
Contact Dermatitis · PMID 11722485 · DOI
Case series / patch test study
443
443 consecutive dermatology patients patch-tested
Arnica patch test with Compositae mix and other allergen series
flower head patch test
5 people (about 1.13%) reacted to arnica and 9 (2.03%) to marigold; 3 of the 5 arnica reactors also had a positive Compositae mix.
About 1 in 100 tested patients reacted to arnica
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Positive patch tests

Limitations: Patients referred to a skin clinic, not the general public.

Read: abstract

Robertson 2007
Homeopathic Arnica montana for post-tonsillectomy analgesia: a randomised placebo control trial.
Homeopathy · PMID 17227743 · DOI
Rct (double blind, placebo controlled)
190
190 adults after tonsil removal; 111 returned usable questionnaires
Homeopathic Arnica 30c
whole plant (homeopathic) 2 tablets 6 times on day 1, then twice daily for 7 days 14 days · vs placebo
Pain scores fell more with arnica (28.3 vs 23.8, p<0.05). No difference in painkiller use or other measures.
Small, significant fall in pain scores
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Pain scores, painkiller use, doctor visits

Limitations: 41.6% of questionnaires were missing.

Read: abstract

Robledo 2025
A phase Ib/II clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topical Arnica tincture to treat non-complicated cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis · PMID 40825042 · DOI
Rct (open label, phase Ib/II, no comparison group)
16
16 adults with proven simple cutaneous leishmaniasis (a parasite skin infection) in Colombia
Arnica tincture from flower heads applied to the skin, 30 days versus 45 days
flower head (tincture) 3 times a day 30 or 45 days, then 180 days of follow-up · vs two arnica regimens compared; no standard-drug comparison
12 of 16 finished follow-up and all 12 healed. 4 people withdrew consent. Adverse events were mild: redness, pain, swelling and burning at the application site.
All 12 who completed follow-up healed (100%)
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Complete healing of lesions; adverse events

Limitations: Small, open-label, no comparison with standard treatment, 4 dropouts; the 100% rate is among completers only.

Funding and conflicts: No competing interests declared.

Registration: NCT05094908

Read: abstract

Rywaniak 2015
Comparison of cytotoxic and anti-platelet activities of polyphenolic extracts from Arnica montana flowers and Juglans regia husks.
Platelets · PMID 24679412 · DOI
In vitro study
in-vitro
Human blood platelets in the lab Phenolic-acid-rich extract of arnica flowers (7.5 and 15 micrograms/mL)
flower head · vs walnut husk extract
The arnica extract reduced ADP-induced platelet clumping in whole blood and plasma and showed no toxicity to platelets in the test tube.
Lowered platelet clumping in vitro
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Platelet clumping, platelet reactivity, cell damage

Limitations: Test tube only; says nothing about arnica gel on skin or any effect on bleeding in people.

Read: abstract

Ryzhaya 2025
Myth Versus Reality: A Review of Social Media Claims and Scientific Evidence for Arnica montana in Postinjectable Procedures.
Dermatol Surg · PMID 40014034 · DOI
Narrative review of the research plus a social media survey
Reddit and TikTok posts, and published research on arnica around cosmetic injections Arnica montana
various
Most posts (91.7% of TikTok, 58% of Reddit) endorsed arnica, mostly without evidence. The research was limited and mixed, with only one study on cosmetic injections.
Inconclusive
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Whether the claims on social media match the research

Limitations: Not a systematic review.

Read: abstract

Schmidt 2023
Arnica montana L.: Doesn't Origin Matter?
Plants (Basel) · PMID 37895999 · DOI
Narrative review
Arnica montana flowers from different regions Arnica montana flower heads
flower head
The main active compounds are helenalin and dihydrohelenalin esters. Flowers from central and eastern Europe are mostly helenalin esters; those from the Iberian peninsula are almost only 11 alpha,13-dihydrohelenalin esters. The two types differ in potency, and two subspecies have been proposed.
Origin affects the chemistry
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Whether the origin of the flowers matters

Limitations: Review.

Read: abstract

Seeley 2006
Effect of homeopathic Arnica montana on bruising in face-lifts: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Arch Facial Plast Surg · PMID 16415448 · DOI
Rct (double blind, placebo controlled)
29
29 people having a face-lift
Homeopathic Arnica montana, taken around surgery
whole plant (homeopathic) around surgery · vs placebo
No difference in colour change or in patient and staff ratings. The arnica group had a smaller bruised area, significant on days 1 and 7 only.
Smaller bruise area on 2 of 4 days; no other difference
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Bruise colour and area by computer analysis; patient and staff ratings

Limitations: Tiny trial, many comparisons.

Read: abstract

Simsek 2016
Topical Application of Arnica and Mucopolysaccharide Polysulfate Attenuates Periorbital Edema and Ecchymosis in Open Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.
Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 26910697 · DOI
Rct (three arm, no placebo)
108
108 people after open rhinoplasty
Arnica cream (versus mucopolysaccharide polysulfate cream and no treatment)
cream (amount not stated in abstract) 10 days of scoring · vs no local treatment; polysulfate cream
Bruising and swelling went down faster with arnica cream and with polysulfate cream than with no treatment (p<0.005 on days 1, 5 and 7). The two creams did not differ.
Faster fall in bruising and swelling than no treatment
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Ecchymosis and swelling on a 0 to 4 scale on days 1 to 10

Limitations: No placebo cream, so people knew they were being treated; scoring scale is coarse.

Read: abstract

Smith 2021
Clinical Trials, Potential Mechanisms, and Adverse Effects of Arnica as an Adjunct Medication for Pain Management.
Medicines (Basel) · PMID 34677487 · DOI
Narrative review
Clinical trials of arnica for pain after surgery, in arthritis, low back pain and muscle pain Arnica products (extract, gel, cream)
various · vs various
The authors say trials show promising effects for pain and suggest arnica as an adjunct for pain. No effect sizes in the abstract.
Described as promising
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Pain relief

Limitations: Narrative review; no certainty rating in the abstract.

Funding and conflicts: No conflict of interest declared.

Read: abstract

Stack 2026
A Systematic Review of Arnica montana in Postoperative Recovery Across Surgical Specialties.
Cureus · PMID 42698408 · DOI
Systematic review (PRISMA, Cochrane risk of bias)
27 studies of oral or topical arnica in surgical patients, searched June 2025 Arnica montana, oral or topical
various · vs various
55.6% of studies (15) reported a measurable benefit, 33.3% (9) found no significant effect, and 11.1% (3) were ongoing without results. Plastic surgery showed the most benefit; other specialties were mixed. The authors call the potential moderate and call for standardisation.
Mixed; counting of studies, not a pooled effect
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Postoperative bruising, swelling and pain

Limitations: The tally counts positive and negative studies without weighting by size or quality; oral and topical forms are combined.

Funding and conflicts: No financial support declared.

Read: abstract

Stevinson 2003
Homeopathic arnica for prevention of pain and bruising: randomized placebo-controlled trial in hand surgery.
J R Soc Med · PMID 12562974 · DOI
Rct (double blind, three arms)
64
64 adults having carpal tunnel surgery (62 analysed)
Homeopathic arnica 30C or 6C
whole plant (homeopathic) 3 tablets daily 7 days before and 14 days after surgery · vs placebo
No difference in pain (P=0.79), bruising (P=0.45), swelling or painkiller use.
No difference
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Pain (McGill) and bruising at day 4; swelling; painkiller use

Limitations: Small trial, one surgery type.

Read: abstract

Tao 2022
Homeopathic Agents or Vitamins in Reducing Ecchymosis after Oculofacial Surgery: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Ophthalmology · PMID 34176651 · DOI
Systematic review (American Academy of Ophthalmology report)
11 studies of homeopathic agents or vitamins for bruising after eyelid or face surgery or laser Oral or topical arnica, and other agents
various · vs placebo
In 7 controlled studies arnica gave no or negligible benefit compared with placebo. The authors conclude that the literature does not support arnica for reducing bruising after eye-area surgery or pulsed-dye laser. No serious side effects were found.
No or negligible benefit versus placebo
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Bruising (ecchymosis)

Limitations: Studies measured bruising in different ways.

Read: abstract

Toma 2024
Effects of Arnica Phytotherapeutic and Homeopathic Formulations on Traumatic Injuries and Inflammatory Conditions: A Systematic Review.
Plants (Basel) · PMID 39520030 · DOI
Systematic review
42 papers on arnica for sport and surgical injuries, arthritis and inflammation Arnica alone and in mixtures; plant-extract and homeopathic forms
various · vs various
The review reports both positive and negative outcomes and gives no single pooled result in the abstract.
Mixed
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Pain and signs of inflammation

Limitations: Combination products included; abstract gives no effect sizes.

Funding and conflicts: No conflicts declared.

Read: abstract

Totonchi 2007
A randomized, controlled comparison between arnica and steroids in the management of postrhinoplasty ecchymosis and edema.
Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 17572575 · DOI
Rct (three arm, blinded raters)
48
48 people having a first nose job (rhinoplasty)
Arnica (form and dose not stated), versus steroids, versus nothing
3 times a day for 4 days 8 days · vs steroids; no treatment
Day 2 swelling was lower with arnica and steroids than with nothing (p<0.0001). Arnica gave no benefit for bruising extent or intensity.
Less early swelling; no bruising benefit
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Bruising extent and intensity and swelling rated by blinded panel

Limitations: Not placebo-controlled; arnica form not clear in the abstract.

Read: abstract

Venkatramani 2013
Toxic optic neuropathy following ingestion of homeopathic medication Arnica-30.
Cutan Ocul Toxicol · PMID 22877081 · DOI
Case report
1
One person who swallowed a large amount of a homeopathic product by mistake
Arnica-30 (homeopathic) swallowed in large quantity
whole plant (homeopathic) large quantity, exact amount not stated vision loss developing over weeks
Severe vomiting needing hospital care, then sudden loss of vision in both eyes, with pale optic discs and thinning of the nerve-fibre layer; diagnosed as toxic optic neuropathy.
One severe case
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Vision and eye tests

Limitations: One case; cause is probable, not proven; exact product contents unknown.

Read: abstract

Vickers 1998
Homeopathic Arnica 30x is ineffective for muscle soreness after long-distance running: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Clin J Pain · PMID 9758072 · DOI
Rct (double blind, placebo controlled)
519
519 runners after long races; 400 gave results
Homeopathic Arnica 30x
whole plant (homeopathic) 5 days after the race · vs placebo
Soreness 45.2 mm with arnica and 41.0 mm with placebo; 95% CI from 8.81 mm in favour of placebo to 0.51 mm in favour of arnica. No difference in race time.
No benefit
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Muscle soreness scores (mean over 2 days)

Limitations: 21% of runners did not return results.

Read: abstract

Widrig 2007
Choosing between NSAID and arnica for topical treatment of hand osteoarthritis in a randomised, double-blind study.
Rheumatol Int · PMID 17318618 · DOI
Rct (double blind, non inferiority)
204
204 adults with painful, X-ray confirmed osteoarthritis of finger joints
Arnica gel (50 g tincture per 100 g, drug-extract ratio 1:20) versus ibuprofen 5% gel
flower head (tincture) gel applied (amount not stated in abstract) 21 days · vs ibuprofen 5% gel
No difference between arnica and ibuprofen gel in pain, hand function or secondary measures. Adverse events: 6 people (6.1%) on ibuprofen, 5 (4.8%) on arnica.
Arnica gel judged not inferior to ibuprofen gel
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Pain intensity and hand function (primary); secondary measures

Limitations: No placebo group, so it cannot show that either gel beats placebo. Funding not stated in the abstract.

Read: abstract

Wolf 2003
[Efficacy of Arnica in varicose vein surgery: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study].
Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd · PMID 14605480 · DOI
Rct (double blind, placebo controlled pilot)
60
60 patients after varicose vein surgery
Arnica D12 (homeopathic)
whole plant (homeopathic) 5 globules, up to 3 times daily 14 days · vs placebo
Bruise area fell by 75.5% with arnica and 71.5% with placebo (p=0.4726). Pain fall 1.0 vs 0.3 points (p=0.1977). Authors say a trend that needs a larger trial.
No significant difference
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Bruise area, wound healing, pain

Limitations: Pilot; abstract in German original (English abstract read).

Read: abstract

n/a 2026
Sources not opened: NCCIH, LiverTox and LactMed arnica entries; Commission E and WHO monographs
n/a · Source
Not read
not applicable not applicable
flower head
The NCCIH arnica page address we tried returned an error; the NCBI Bookshelf pages returned a bot-check page. Their content is cited only second-hand through the EMA assessment report and is marked not verified.
Not verified
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Placeholder for sources not read

Limitations: Not read.

Read: summary-only

van Exsel 2016
Arnica Ointment 10% Does Not Improve Upper Blepharoplasty Outcome: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 27348641 · DOI
Rct (double blind, placebo controlled)
136
136 people having upper eyelid surgery (blepharoplasty)
Arnica ointment 10%
3 days, 7 days and 6 weeks of follow-up · vs placebo ointment, and an untreated side
No difference between arnica, placebo and no ointment on any measure.
No difference
Methods, limits and funding

Outcomes: Overall look of the eyelids on photographs; swelling, bruising, redness, pain, satisfaction

Limitations: One surgery type; ointment strength 10% only.

Read: abstract

What we do not know yet

  • What the evidence supports: arnica gel was similar to ibuprofen gel in finger-joint osteoarthritis (moderate certainty, one trial, no placebo). Everything else is mixed, low, very low or insufficient.
  • What is uncertain: whether arnica gel beats placebo for osteoarthritis, bruises or sore muscles; trial products and strengths differ; homeopathic pill trials are small and disagree; the frequency of allergy, and whether the 2025 draft EU monograph is final, are not known.
  • No trial of arnica in pregnancy, breastfeeding or young children was found. No human study of arnica with blood thinners was found. LiverTox, LactMed, NCCIH, FDA, Commission E and WHO documents were not read directly.

How new research is added

New studies are found by a saved PubMed search and are placed in a review queue. A person reads each one before it changes any evidence rating or safety wording. New publications never change ratings automatically.

Lab markers

What changed in blood or saliva tests during trials. A changed number is not the same as feeling or being healthier, and we give no "normal ranges".

Inflammatory 2

●

C-reactive protein (CRP)

No clear change in trials

A blood protein that rises with inflammation.

Very low certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

Used as a lab marker of body-wide inflammation.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

One small trial.

Safety implication

None identified.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
37Topical arnica did not change blood markers of inflammation, which included CRP (values not given in the abstract).20 trained men after downhill runningTopical arnica vs placebo, 96 hours

37

●

C-reactive protein (CRP) after heart surgery

No clear change in trials

Blood protein that rises with inflammation.

Low certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

Marker of inflammation after surgery.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

No difference.

Safety implication

None identified.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
9No significant difference in CRP pattern between arnica plus Bryonia and placebo.92 aortic valve surgery patientsHomeopathic arnica plus Bryonia

9

Organ function 1

↕

Haemoglobin after childbirth

Mixed results in trials

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen; a fall suggests blood loss.

Very low certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

Used as an indirect measure of blood loss.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

Preliminary, small, combination.

Safety implication

None identified.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
35Haemoglobin 12.7 to 12.4 with homeopathic arnica plus Bellis versus 12.7 to 11.6 with placebo at 72 hours (p<0.05).40 women after childbirthArnica plus Bellis C6 or C30

35

Other 13

↕

Pain score (visual scale or WOMAC pain)

Mixed results in trials

How much pain a person reports on a scale from none to worst.

Low certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

The main thing people want a pain gel to improve.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

Statistical differences in small trials; the direction changes between trials.

Safety implication

Pain is a symptom, not a safety signal.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
54Hand osteoarthritis pain improved to a similar degree with arnica gel and ibuprofen gel over 21 days.204 adults, finger-joint osteoarthritisArnica gel vs ibuprofen 5% gel
37Less pain by VAS and tenderness at 72 hours after hard running with arnica.20 trained menTopical arnica vs placebo, 96 hours
1Pain was higher on the arnica leg at 24 hours (3.04 vs 2.36); no difference at 72 and 96 hours.53 volunteersArnica cream vs placebo cream
2Lower pain than standard care alone until day 5 after wisdom-tooth surgery.60 patientsTopical arnica plus standard care

54 37 1 2

▼

WOMAC total score (knee)

Lowered in trials

A questionnaire that adds up knee pain, stiffness and difficulty with daily tasks.

Very low certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

Standard measure of osteoarthritis symptoms.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

Statistically significant but with no control group.

Safety implication

None identified from this measure.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
25Median total score fell significantly at 3 and 6 weeks (both P<0.0001); values not given in the abstract.79 adults with knee osteoarthritisArnica fresh-plant gel twice daily, 6 weeks

25

●

Hand function score

No clear change in trials

A questionnaire about how well the hand works in daily tasks.

Moderate certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

Shows whether pain relief helps real use of the hand.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

The comparison is arnica versus ibuprofen gel, not versus placebo.

Safety implication

None identified.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
54No difference between arnica gel and ibuprofen gel in function improvement.204 adults with finger-joint osteoarthritisArnica gel vs ibuprofen gel, 21 days
7Cochrane: function 0.4 points different on a 0 to 30 scale (95% CI -1.75 to 0.95).174 people in the single included trialArnica gel vs ibuprofen gel

54 7

↕

Bruise score (rater or photograph)

Mixed results in trials

A doctor's or panel's rating of how large and dark a bruise looks.

Low certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

Directly shows whether bruises fade faster.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

Results split; the one positive trial used laser-made bruises.

Safety implication

None identified.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
28Arnica 20% improved the bruise score more than petrolatum (P=0.003).Healthy volunteers with laser-made bruisesArnica 20% ointment, 2 weeks
3No difference between arnica gel and vehicle.19 patients after pulsed-dye laserArnica gel vs vehicle, 2 weeks
57No difference between arnica 10% ointment, placebo or no ointment after eyelid surgery.136 eyelid surgery patientsArnica ointment 10% vs placebo

28 3 57

↕

Swelling (oedema) after surgery

Mixed results in trials

Fluid build-up that makes a surgical area puffy.

Low certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

A common aim of arnica after surgery.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

Conflicting, small, mostly unblinded.

Safety implication

None identified.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
45Swelling regressed faster with arnica cream than with no cream (p<0.005 on days 1, 5 and 7).108 rhinoplasty patientsArnica cream vs polysulfate cream vs none
2Swelling was lower with polysulfate cream, not with arnica, in wisdom-tooth surgery.60 patientsTopical arnica or polysulfate plus standard care
57No difference between arnica ointment and placebo for swelling.136 eyelid surgery patientsArnica 10% ointment

45 2 57

●

Creatine kinase (CK) and myoglobin

No clear change in trials

Muscle proteins that leak into blood after muscle damage.

Very low certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

Objective sign of how much muscle was damaged by exercise.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

One small trial.

Safety implication

None identified.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
37Topical arnica did not change creatine kinase or myoglobin (values not given in the abstract).20 trained menTopical arnica vs placebo, 96 hours

37

▲

Complete healing of skin lesions (leishmaniasis)

Raised in trials

Whether the skin sore closes fully by the end of follow-up.

Very low certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

The main outcome for a parasite skin infection.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

Open label, no comparison group.

Safety implication

Mild application-site reactions in the trial.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
40All 12 people who finished 180-day follow-up had complete healing; 4 of 16 withdrew.16 adults with cutaneous leishmaniasisArnica tincture 30 or 45 days

40

↕

Knee circumference after surgery

Mixed results in trials

Distance around the knee, a simple measure of swelling.

Low certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

Shows swelling after knee operations.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

One of three trials significant.

Safety implication

None identified.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
6Change vs placebo: arthroscopy -0.25% (95% CI -0.85 to 0.41); knee replacement -1.68% (-4.24 to 0.77); cruciate repair -1.80% (-3.30 to -0.30, p=0.019).227 + 35 + 57 patientsHomeopathic arnica 30x

6

↕

Bruise area and colour after face surgery

Mixed results in trials

Size and colour of the bruise measured from photographs.

Low certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

The main measure of bruising trials.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

Significance only at loose thresholds or on some days.

Safety implication

One person had itching and rash with arnica in the Chaiet trial.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
44Smaller bruised area on days 1 and 7; no colour difference.29 face-lift patientsHomeopathic arnica
26No difference in area or severity at days 3 and 7.Eyelid surgery patientsHomeopathic arnica
8Extent 16.2%, 32.9% and 20.4% smaller; significant on day 7 at P=0.097.22 nose-surgery patientsOral arnica

44 26 8

↕

Pain after surgery (scores and painkillers)

Mixed results in trials

Pain reported by patients, and how many painkillers they used.

Low certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

The most important outcome for patients after surgery.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

Small differences in small trials.

Safety implication

None identified.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
39Pain score fell 28.3 with arnica vs 23.8 with placebo (p<0.05); painkiller use did not differ.111 tonsil-surgery patients with usable dataHomeopathic arnica 30c
48No difference in pain at day 4 (P=0.79) or in painkiller use.62 carpal tunnel patientsHomeopathic arnica 30C or 6C
29Lower pain on days 1 to 5; fewer painkillers.10 patients, two operations eachArnica 12 CH

39 48 29

●

Blood in surgical drains

No clear change in trials

Volume of blood and fluid collected in the drain after surgery.

Low certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

Direct measure of bleeding after surgery.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

No significant difference.

Safety implication

None identified.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
9362 vs 456 mL at 12 h (P=0.19); 520 vs 620 mL at 24 h (P=0.23); 640 vs 796 mL at removal (P=0.35).92 aortic valve surgery patientsHomeopathic arnica plus Bryonia vs placebo

9

●

Bleeding time and clotting tests

No clear change in trials

How long a small cut takes to stop bleeding, and blood clotting tests.

Low certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

Tests whether arnica affects clotting.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

Brief report.

Safety implication

No clotting signal seen with homeopathic arnica; this says nothing about herbal arnica.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
4No significant effect on bleeding time or other clotting tests just after dosing.Healthy volunteers (number not in the abstract)Homeopathic arnica, crossover

4

●

Muscle soreness (VAS) after running

No clear change in trials

Soreness rated on a line from none to worst.

Low certainty
Results and what it means

Why it was measured

Direct measure of how sore runners feel.

Statistical vs. clinical meaning

No difference.

Safety implication

None identified.

StudyResultPeopleProduct
5345.2 mm with arnica vs 41.0 mm with placebo; 95% CI 8.81 mm in favour of placebo to 0.51 mm in favour of arnica.400 runners with resultsHomeopathic arnica 30x

53

Safety

What studies and official sources say about side effects, medicines and who should check first. Each point shows what kind of evidence it comes from.

Main points to know 8
  • Arnica is for unbroken skin only. Do not swallow arnica plant products.. The EU herbal committee only covers arnica flower products for the skin. It says arnica preparations can be toxic when taken by mouth and should not be used internally, including as tea, and calls internal use obsolete. Swallowing arnica products has caused severe gastroenteritis, nervousness, fast or slow heart rate, muscle weakness, collapse and death in older reports. The main toxic compound named is helenalin. Authoritative guidance 14 34
  • Arnica on the skin can cause an allergic rash, especially in people allergic to daisy-family plants.. Arnica belongs to the daisy family (Asteraceae, also called Compositae). The EU monograph lists allergy to arnica or to other plants of this family as a reason not to use it. Itching, redness and eczema can happen; the frequency is not known. In one skin-clinic patch-test series 5 of 443 people (about 1.13%) reacted to arnica. Authoritative guidance 15 12 38 36
  • Do not put arnica on broken skin, near the eyes or on mucous membranes.. The monograph says the preparation should not be used on broken skin or near the eyes or mucous membranes, and that tinctures must be diluted. Undiluted tincture or strong preparations can cause blistering or even tissue death in the skin according to the EU assessment report, which quotes older sources. Authoritative guidance 15 14
  • Homeopathic arnica pills are a different product from herbal arnica, but a large swallowed amount caused serious harm in one case.. Homeopathic arnica is a very diluted product swallowed as pills or drops. The EU assessment report says it is completely different from the herbal preparations of the monograph. Pills at normal dilutions are generally mild in trials, but one person who mistakenly swallowed a large amount of Arnica-30 had severe vomiting and then lasting damage to the optic nerves in both eyes. Do not swallow large amounts of any arnica product. Case report 14 52
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding: use is not recommended because safety is not established.. The EU monograph says safety in pregnancy and breastfeeding has not been established and use is not recommended. No fertility, reproductive-toxicity, genotoxicity or carcinogenicity tests have been done on the monograph preparations. The assessment report also quotes an infant with haemolytic anaemia after the mother drank arnica flower tea. Authoritative guidance 15 14
  • Blood thinners: a theory and one case report, not an established interaction.. A test-tube study found an arnica flower extract reduced platelet clumping, and the EU assessment report quotes one case of a raised INR in an 81-year-old woman on warfarin who used a large amount of topical arnica. The EU monograph says no interactions are reported. A trial of homeopathic arnica in healthy volunteers found no effect on clotting tests. If you take warfarin or other blood thinners, ask your doctor or pharmacist before using arnica. Pharmacological theory 15 14 41 4
  • Skin use is meant to be short. See a doctor if symptoms last 3 to 4 days.. The EU monograph advises seeing a doctor if symptoms last more than 3 to 4 days or get worse. The assessment report says prolonged treatment can cause swollen, blistering dermatitis or eczema. Authoritative guidance 15 14
  • A trial found more pain, not less, after arnica cream on exercised legs.. In one trial of 53 volunteers, leg pain 24 hours after calf exercises was higher on the arnica-treated leg than on the placebo leg (3.04 vs 2.36). This did not last to 48 hours. It shows results can go either way and that reactions to the cream are possible. Controlled trial 1
Side effects 9
EffectHow oftenSeverity and recoveryEvidence
Allergic contact dermatitis from arnica on the skin: itching, redness, eczema, sometimes blistering
EU monograph: frequency not known. Patch-test series: 5 of 443 skin-clinic patients (1.13%) reacted to arnica. Helenalin-type sesquiterpene lactones are thought to be the main allergens. The assessment report also mentions 1,280 patients in licensing safety data with skin reactions as the main finding, quoted as a frequency of about 1 in 100; because the monograph says frequency is not known, no frequency is claimed here.
Not establishedmoderate
Reported to settle after stopping and treatment in the case reports; a case of blistering after one application of tincture improved with early diagnosis and treatment.
Authoritative guidance 15 38 19 36 14
Skin irritation, blistering or tissue damage from undiluted tincture or strong preparations
Quoted in the EU report from older sources (Willuhn 1983, Blumenthal 2000). Tinctures must be diluted before use.
Not establishedmoderate
Not reported in the sources read.
Authoritative guidance 14
Mild reactions where the tincture, gel or cream is applied: redness, pain, swelling, burning
The knee trial reported one allergic reaction among 79 people.
7.6% local events in an open knee gel trial; 4.8% in the hand osteoarthritis trial armmild
Mild in the trials; follow-up outcomes not detailed in the abstracts.
Controlled trial 25 54 40
Eye and mucous-membrane reactions after accidental contact (eyelid redness, itching)
From the EudraVigilance safety database (96 spontaneous reports in total, mostly skin reactions).
Not establishedmoderate
Not stated.
Authoritative guidance 14
Severe poisoning from swallowing arnica plant products: gastroenteritis, nervous-system disturbance, fast or slow heart rate, collapse, muscle paralysis, death
Details are quoted second-hand in the EU report from Commission E and reference books; no primary case could be read here. Helenalin is named as the toxic principle.
Not establishedsevere
Death has been reported in older sources; serious but non-fatal symptoms followed ingestion of 30 mL of a 20% tincture.
Authoritative guidance 14 34
Haemolytic anaemia in a 9-day-old breastfed baby after the mother drank arnica flower tea
Quoted in the EU assessment report; we did not read the original report.
Not establishedsevere
The anaemia corrected after exchange transfusion and phototherapy.
Case report 14
Severe necrotic skin lesions with fever after a cream containing 1.5% arnica
One woman, described in the EU report (Delmonte 1998) as a Sweet-syndrome-like reaction the authors linked to arnica; quoted second-hand.
Not establishedsevere
Not stated in the report as quoted.
Case report 14
Toxic optic neuropathy (vision loss) after mistakenly swallowing a large quantity of homeopathic Arnica-30
One case; the cause is probable, not proven.
Not establishedsevere
Profound vision loss with pale optic discs was still present at 6 weeks.
Case report 52
Itching or rash after oral (homeopathic) arnica in a surgery trial
Very small trial.
1 of 9 people on arnica in one trialmild
Resolved during the study period.
Controlled trial 8
Liver

We found no published human case of liver injury caused by arnica used on the skin. In mice, a single injected dose of helenalin (25 mg/kg) raised the liver marker ALT, though liver tissue itself showed no change on examination (quoted in the EU report). LiverTox was not read. 14 15

How often. No frequency of human liver injury was found. Absence of reports is not proof of safety, and no human liver test data from the trials are given in the abstracts read. The EU report says no data exist for people with impaired liver or kidney function.

Monitoring. No agency monitoring advice was found. People with liver disease should ask a doctor before using arnica, and should not swallow it.

This is a safety connection. It is not evidence that Arnica supports liver health.

Medicines and supplements 4
WithWhy it mattersImportanceEvidenceWhat to do
Blood thinners and antiplatelet drugs (warfarin, aspirin, clopidogrel and similar)
prescription
Theory: a phenolic-acid-rich arnica flower extract reduced ADP-induced platelet clumping in the test tube.The EU monograph says no interactions are reported. The EU assessment report quotes one case of a high INR in an 81-year-old woman on warfarin who used a large amount of topical arnica on her back; the original report was not read. Homeopathic arnica did not change clotting tests in healthy volunteers.Pharmacological theory Very low certainty 15 14 41 4If you take a blood thinner, ask your doctor or pharmacist before using arnica, and avoid large areas or heavy daily use unless they agree.
Other medicines broken down by liver enzymes (cytochrome P450)
prescription
In mice, injected helenalin lowered liver cytochrome P450 content and enzyme activity (quoted in the EU report).No human data. The EU report says there are no specific data on interactions. The mouse doses were injected, not rubbed on the skin, and rat tests found almost no helenalin-type compounds in blood after skin use.Animal research Very low certainty 14 22No action needed beyond the usual advice to tell your pharmacist about all products you use.
Other plants and cosmetics from the daisy family (chamomile, marigold, sunflower, tansy and similar)
herb
Cross-allergy between sesquiterpene lactone-containing plants.In allergic patients 5 of 6 arnica-sensitive people reacted to arnica products, and the EU monograph lists allergy to other Asteraceae as a contraindication. A case of sunflower allergy with cross-reaction to arnica is quoted in the EU report.Case series Low certainty 15 36 38 14If you have reacted to a daisy-family plant, do not use arnica.
Other skin products used on the same spot (strong anti-inflammatory gels, steroid creams, perfumed products)
prescription
Unknown; some patients with several contact allergies react to creams or perfumes in the base as well as to the plant.Patch-test work found plant allergens and also fragrances, emulsifiers and preservatives caused reactions in multi-allergic patients.Case series Very low certainty 36A reaction may come from the base of the product rather than arnica; ask a doctor or pharmacist if you react.
Who should check first 8
SituationAdviceEvidence
Allergy to arnica or to other daisy-family (Asteraceae/Compositae) plantsDo not use. The EU monograph lists hypersensitivity to arnica and to other Asteraceae as a contraindication.Authoritative guidance 15 12 36
Broken, cut, scraped or inflamed skin and open wounds; near the eyes or mucous membranesDo not use there. The monograph says not on broken skin and not near the eyes or mucous membranes.Authoritative guidance 15 14
Swallowing any arnica plant product (tea, tincture, extract, capsules)Do not swallow. The EU report calls internal use obsolete and potentially unsafe, with serious and sometimes fatal poisoning reported in older sources.Authoritative guidance 14 34
PregnancyUse is not recommended: safety has not been established and there are no fertility or reproductive-toxicity data (EMA). Older literature quoted by the EU report mentions arnica swallowed to provoke abortion.Authoritative guidance 15 14
BreastfeedingUse is not recommended by the EU monograph. The EU report quotes LactMed that skin use is usually safe while swallowing arnica plant products should be avoided, and describes a baby with haemolytic anaemia after the mother drank arnica tea. The two statements differ, so ask a doctor or midwife.Authoritative guidance 15 14
ChildrenThe 2025 draft EU monograph says use under 3 years is not recommended for infusion, tincture and fluid-extract preparations, and under 12 years is not established for the oil extract and other extracts. The older 2016 public summary said from age 12. Ask a doctor or pharmacist.Authoritative guidance 15 13
A past rash or blisters from arnicaDo not use again; contact allergy to arnica is documented, including blistering after a single application of tincture.Case report 19
Fever or signs of worsening skin infection, or a boil on the faceThe draft monograph says see a doctor for fever, worsening skin infection, or small boils on the face.Authoritative guidance 15
Overdose, product quality and regulators

Summary. Arnica flower heads contain helenalin-type sesquiterpene lactones. These give the plant its anti-inflammatory activity and also its allergic and toxic effects. On the skin the main problems are allergy and irritation. Swallowed as plant material, arnica is poisonous.

Animal. Single-dose studies quoted in the EU report: the oral LD50 of an unspecified extract was more than 5 g/kg in rats and 123 mg/kg in mice. For helenalin injected into the abdomen the LD50 was 43 mg/kg in one mouse study, and 85 to 150 mg/kg (route not stated) across mice, rats, rabbits and hamsters. In mice a single injection of 25 mg/kg raised liver and kidney blood markers (ALT, LDH, BUN), repeated doses affected the thymus, spleen and lymph-node lymphocytes and lowered liver P450 enzymes. Rat tests of arnica tincture on the skin found most sesquiterpene lactones absorbed into the skin, blood levels below the detection limit and no irritation or dermal toxicity at the amounts tested.

Human doses studied. Skin gels, creams and ointments were studied for 2 to 6 weeks in trials. A tincture was used on the skin for 30 to 45 days in a small trial. No oral arnica plant-material doses were studied in the trials read; homeopathic dilutions were studied separately.

High dose or long term signals. The EU report says prolonged skin treatment can cause oedematous dermatitis with pustules, and eczema; and that higher concentrations can cause blistering or tissue damage. Serious but non-fatal symptoms followed swallowing 30 mL of a 20% tincture.

Overdose response. The EU report says no case of overdose with the monograph preparations (skin use) has been reported. Swallowed arnica has caused gastroenteritis, heart-rate changes, collapse and paralysis in older sources. For homeopathic Arnica-30, a case report describes vomiting and optic nerve damage after a large mistaken intake.

Genotoxicity. No guideline tests exist for the monograph preparations (EMA). An arnica extract was mutagenic in the Ames test, which the authors linked to flavonols; helenalin itself was not mutagenic in two Ames tests (quoted in the EU report). No carcinogenicity or reproductive toxicity data.

Toxic plant parts. The flower heads are the part used and contain the helenalin-type compounds; the EU report says the flower is irritant to mucous membranes. The cosmetic safety report notes that the name Arnica montana is also used for plant material from the roots or rhizomes. Use of the plant in teas or by mouth is the highest-risk exposure.

Arnica products vary in chemistry and may be adulterated or mislabelled.

Adulteration with other daisy-family flowers. The EU report lists adulteration with Chrysanthemum segetum, Crepis biennis, Hieracium, Hypochoeris, Picris hieracioides, Taraxacum officinalis and Tussilago farfara, and says the most common substitute is Mexican arnica (Heterotheca inuloides). 14

Chemistry depends on where the flowers grew. Flowers from central and eastern Europe contain mostly helenalin esters; flowers from the Iberian peninsula contain almost only 11 alpha,13-dihydrohelenalin esters, and the two types differ in potency. The European Pharmacopoeia requires at least 0.4% sesquiterpene lactones in the dried flower. 43 14

Homeopathic versus herbal products. Homeopathic arnica is made from different parts of the plant, often the whole plant, and is diluted. It is not the same as the flower-head preparations covered by the EU monograph. 14

BodyActionDate
European Medicines Agency, Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) (European Union)Final Community herbal monograph on Arnica montana L., flos (EMA/HMPC/198793/2012), adopted 6 May 2014: traditional use for bruises, sprains and localised muscle pain; skin use only. source2014-05-06
European Medicines Agency, HMPC (European Union)Draft Revision 1 of the EU herbal monograph (EMA/HMPC/524586/2024), with draft assessment report (EMA/HMPC/432016/2024), released for consultation 19 March 2025 (consultation 15 April to 15 July 2025). Adds insect-bite inflammation and small boils and a sunflower-oil extract. Final adoption of the revision was not confirmed by us. source2025-03-19
European Medicines Agency (European Union)Herbal medicine: summary for the public, arnica flower (EMA/654173/2016). source2016-11-22
Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel (United States)Final report on the safety assessment of Arnica montana extract and Arnica montana: data judged insufficient to support safety in cosmetics.2001
When to get medical help
  • Swelling of the face, lips or tongue, trouble breathing or a spreading hive-type rash after using arnica: get urgent medical help.
  • Blisters, weeping or spreading rash, or skin that turns dark or breaks down where arnica was applied: stop using it and see a doctor.
  • Anyone who has swallowed arnica plant products or a large amount of homeopathic arnica: vomiting, abdominal pain, a fast, slow or irregular heartbeat, weakness, confusion or collapse: call emergency services or a poison control centre.
  • Sudden loss or dimming of vision, or eye pain, after swallowing arnica or after arnica reached the eye: emergency care.
  • A breastfed baby who becomes pale, yellow or very sleepy after the mother used or drank an arnica product: seek medical help.
  • Unusual bleeding, nosebleeds or bruising while taking a blood thinner and using arnica: contact your doctor.

Stop the supplement and contact a clinician or emergency service. In the US, Poison Control is 1-800-222-1222.

General information only, not medical advice. Ask a clinician or pharmacist before use, especially with medicines, in pregnancy or with a health condition. See the Natural Remedy Safety guide.

Frequently asked questions

Does arnica gel help bruises?

Maybe a little, but not reliably. One trial found 20% arnica ointment cleared laser-made bruises better than plain petrolatum, while another found no difference after laser treatment, and a 136-person trial found no benefit after eyelid surgery. Reviews call the evidence insufficient. The EU lists it as a traditional medicine for bruises on the basis of long use.

28 3 57 18 13

Does arnica help arthritis pain?

For finger-joint osteoarthritis, arnica gel worked about as well as ibuprofen gel in one 204-person trial, and the Cochrane review calls this moderate-certainty evidence. There was no placebo group. A knee trial without a comparison group found lower scores, which is weak evidence.

54 7 25

Does arnica help sore muscles after exercise?

The evidence is mixed. One small trial found less pain 3 days after hard running, another found more pain a day after calf exercises, and a large trial found homeopathic arnica pills did not help runners.

37 1 53

Does arnica help after surgery?

Results are mixed. A review of surgical trials found 15 of 27 studies reported a benefit and 9 did not, and an eye-surgeon review found no or negligible benefit for bruising versus placebo. Small trials after nose, wisdom-tooth and knee surgery were more positive. Do not start arnica around surgery without telling your surgeon, especially if you take a blood thinner.

47 49 45 2 6

Is homeopathic arnica the same as arnica gel?

No. Homeopathic arnica is a very diluted preparation made from the plant and taken as pills or drops. The EU assessment report says it is completely different from the herbal preparations the EU monograph covers. Results from one do not apply to the other.

14 17 11

Is it safe to swallow arnica?

No. Arnica plant products, such as tea, tinctures and extracts, should not be swallowed. The EU report says swallowing arnica has caused severe gastroenteritis, heart-rate changes, collapse and death, and that the toxic compound is helenalin. Call a poison centre or emergency services if someone has swallowed it.

14 34

Can arnica cause an allergic reaction?

Yes. Itching, redness and eczema can occur, and blistering after a single use has been reported. In one skin-clinic patch-test series 5 of 443 people (about 1.13%) reacted to arnica. The EU says the frequency is not known. People allergic to daisy-family plants such as chamomile, marigold or sunflower should not use arnica.

15 38 19 36

Can I put arnica on a cut or broken skin?

No. The EU monograph says not to use arnica on broken skin or near the eyes or mucous membranes, and that tinctures should be diluted before use. Undiluted tincture can cause blistering or tissue damage.

15 14

Is arnica safe in pregnancy or breastfeeding?

Safety has not been established, so the EU monograph does not recommend use in pregnancy or breastfeeding. The EU report quotes one case of a baby with anaemia after the mother drank arnica flower tea. Ask your doctor or midwife.

15 14

Does arnica interact with blood thinners?

Not proven. An arnica flower extract reduced platelet clumping in a test-tube study, and one case report quoted by the EU describes a high INR in a woman on warfarin who used a lot of topical arnica. The EU monograph reports no interactions. If you take a blood thinner, ask your doctor or pharmacist before using arnica.

15 14 41 4

Is arnica safe for children?

The 2025 draft EU monograph says use under 3 years is not recommended for some preparations, and under 12 years has not been established for others. The older 2016 public summary said from age 12. Ask a doctor or pharmacist before using it on a child.

15 13

What does the European Medicines Agency say about arnica?

The EU herbal committee lists arnica flower for the skin as a traditional herbal medicine for bruises, sprains and local muscle pain, on the basis of long use. It says clinical studies were too small or lacked controls to draw firm conclusions. See a doctor if symptoms last more than 3 to 4 days. A revised draft was released for comment in 2025; we have not confirmed it is final.

12 15 13 14

Explore by health goal

Muscle RecoveryJoint SupportInflammation BalanceHealthy SkinPhysical StaminaImmune SupportEndurance SupportWomens WellnessHeart Health

Editorial transparency
Written by
AlternativeMed editorial team. Research compiled with AI assistance, then checked against PubMed records.
Medical review
None. This page has not been reviewed by a physician or pharmacist.
First published
2026-10-25
Last substantive update
2026-10-25
How we research
We searched PubMed, read the EU draft herbal monograph, the final 2014 monograph, the draft assessment report and the public summary from the European Medicines Agency, and checked plant names in GBIF and the NCBI taxonomy and compounds in PubChem. Each cited study was looked up in PubMed and its abstract read; where only an abstract was read, numbers come from it alone. Certainty ratings are ours, using plain categories, except that we follow the Cochrane review for the hand osteoarthritis comparison.
How we rate evidence
See "How we rate evidence" in the Evidence tab.
Independence
No product is promoted on this page. No affiliate links are shown. If one is added later it will be labelled and kept apart from the evidence.
Sources 57

Each source was opened and checked. Where we read only the abstract, it says so. The small numbers in the text point here.

  1. Adkison JD, Bauer DW, Chang T. The effect of topical arnica on muscle pain.. Ann Pharmacother. 2010. PMID 20807867. DOI 10.1345/aph.1P071. (abstract)
  2. Akay N, Şanal KO. Can Topical Agents (Arnica and Mucopolysaccharide Polysulfate) Reduce Postoperative Pain, Edema and Trismus Following Mandibular Third Molar Surgery?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024. PMID 37913818. DOI 10.1016/j.joms.2023.10.003. (abstract)
  3. Alonso D, Lazarus MC, Baumann L. Effects of topical arnica gel on post-laser treatment bruises.. Dermatol Surg. 2002. PMID 12174058. DOI 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.02011.x. (abstract)
  4. Baillargeon L, Drouin J, Desjardins L et al.. [The effects of Arnica Montana on blood coagulation. Randomized controlled trial].. Can Fam Physician. 1993. PMID 7903572. (abstract)
  5. Bartolomei S, Nigro F, D'Amico A et al.. Mud Pack With Menthol and Arnica Montana Accelerates Recovery Following a High-Volume Resistance Training Session for Lower Body in Trained Men.. J Strength Cond Res. 2022. PMID 32956264. DOI 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003751. (abstract)
  6. Brinkhaus B, Wilkens JM, Lüdtke R et al.. Homeopathic arnica therapy in patients receiving knee surgery: results of three randomised double-blind trials.. Complement Ther Med. 2006. PMID 17105693. DOI 10.1016/j.ctim.2006.04.004. (abstract)
  7. Cameron M, Chrubasik S. Topical herbal therapies for treating osteoarthritis.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID 23728701. DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD010538. (abstract)
  8. Chaiet SR, Marcus BC. Perioperative Arnica montana for Reduction of Ecchymosis in Rhinoplasty Surgery.. Ann Plast Surg. 2016. PMID 25954844. DOI 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000312. (abstract)
  9. Cornu C, Joseph P, Gaillard S et al.. No effect of a homoeopathic combination of Arnica montana and Bryonia alba on bleeding, inflammation, and ischaemia after aortic valve surgery.. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010. PMID 20233176. DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03574.x. (abstract)
  10. Drogosz J, Janecka A. Helenalin - A Sesquiterpene Lactone with Multidirectional Activity.. Curr Drug Targets. 2019. PMID 30317996. DOI 10.2174/1389450119666181012125230. (abstract)
  11. Ernst E, Pittler MH. Efficacy of homeopathic arnica: a systematic review of placebo-controlled clinical trials.. Arch Surg. 1998. PMID 9820349. DOI 10.1001/archsurg.133.11.1187. (abstract)
  12. European Medicines Agency, HMPC. Community herbal monograph on Arnica montana L., flos (final, EMA/HMPC/198793/2012). EMA. 2014. (full-text)
  13. European Medicines Agency. Herbal medicine: summary for the public. Arnica flower (EMA/654173/2016). EMA. 2016. (full-text)
  14. European Medicines Agency, HMPC. Assessment report on Arnica montana L., flos (Draft, Revision 1, EMA/HMPC/432016/2024). EMA. 2025. (full-text)
  15. European Medicines Agency, HMPC. European Union herbal monograph on Arnica montana L., flos (Draft, Revision 1, EMA/HMPC/524586/2024). EMA. 2025. (full-text)
  16. GBIF Secretariat. GBIF Backbone Taxonomy: Arnica montana L. (usageKey 5405976). GBIF API. 2026. (full-text)
  17. Gaertner K, Baumgartner S, Walach H. Is Homeopathic Arnica Effective for Postoperative Recovery? A Meta-analysis of Placebo-Controlled and Active Comparator Trials.. Front Surg. 2021. PMID 34977136. DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2021.680930. (abstract)
  18. Ho D, Jagdeo J, Waldorf HA. Is There a Role for Arnica and Bromelain in Prevention of Post-Procedure Ecchymosis or Edema? A Systematic Review of the Literature.. Dermatol Surg. 2016. PMID 27035499. DOI 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000701. (abstract)
  19. Hörmann HP, Korting HC. Allergie acute contact dermatitis due to Arnica tincture self-medication.. Phytomedicine. 1995. PMID 23196021. DOI 10.1016/S0944-7113(11)80009-7. (abstract)
  20. Iannitti T, Morales-Medina JC, Bellavite P et al.. Effectiveness and Safety of Arnica montana in Post-Surgical Setting, Pain and Inflammation.. Am J Ther. 2016. PMID 25171757. DOI 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000036. (abstract)
  21. Jeffrey SL, Belcher HJ. Use of Arnica to relieve pain after carpal-tunnel release surgery.. Altern Ther Health Med. 2002. PMID 11892685. (abstract)
  22. Jürgens FM, Robledo SM, Schmidt TJ. Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic and Toxicological Parameters of Arnica Tincture after Dermal Application In Vivo.. Pharmaceutics. 2022. PMID 36365196. DOI 10.3390/pharmaceutics14112379. (abstract)
  23. Jürgens FM, Herrmann FC, Robledo SM et al.. Dermal Absorption of Sesquiterpene Lactones from Arnica Tincture.. Pharmaceutics. 2022. PMID 35456576. DOI 10.3390/pharmaceutics14040742. (abstract)
  24. Karow JH, Abt HP, Fröhling M et al.. Efficacy of Arnica montana D4 for healing of wounds after Hallux valgus surgery compared to diclofenac.. J Altern Complement Med. 2008. PMID 18199022. DOI 10.1089/acm.2007.0560. (abstract)
  25. Knuesel O, Weber M, Suter A. Arnica montana gel in osteoarthritis of the knee: an open, multicenter clinical trial.. Adv Ther. 2002. PMID 12539881. DOI 10.1007/BF02850361. (abstract)
  26. Kotlus BS, Heringer DM, Dryden RM. Evaluation of homeopathic Arnica montana for ecchymosis after upper blepharoplasty: a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study.. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010. PMID 20683279. DOI 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181cd93be. (abstract)
  27. Lass C, Vocanson M, Wagner S et al.. Anti-inflammatory and immune-regulatory mechanisms prevent contact hypersensitivity to Arnica montana L.. Exp Dermatol. 2008. PMID 18341569. DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00717.x. (abstract)
  28. Leu S, Havey J, White LE et al.. Accelerated resolution of laser-induced bruising with topical 20% arnica: a rater-blinded randomized controlled trial.. Br J Dermatol. 2010. PMID 20412090. DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09813.x. (abstract)
  29. Makary C, Balaa J, Mansour N et al.. Effect of Arnica Montana on postoperative edema, pain, and trismus following surgical extraction of impacted third molars: A double-blind clinical trial.. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2026. PMID 42173484. DOI 10.1016/j.jormas.2026.102848. (abstract)
  30. Mawardi H, Ghazalh S, Shehatah A et al.. Systemic Use of Arnica Montana for the Reduction of Postsurgical Sequels following Extraction of Impacted Mandibular 3(rd) Molars: A Pilot Study.. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020. PMID 33381206. DOI 10.1155/2020/6725175. (abstract)
  31. Merfort I. [Arnica: new insights on the molecular mode of action of a traditional medicinal plant].. Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd. 2003. PMID 12808362. DOI 10.1159/000071692. (abstract)
  32. NCBI. NCBI Taxonomy: Arnica montana (taxid 436207). NCBI Taxonomy. 2026. (summary-only)
  33. NCBI PubChem. PubChem compound records for arnica constituents (CIDs 23205, 442294, 442142, 9996862, 5280460, 5281426, 6989). PubChem API. 2026. (summary-only)
  34. No authors listed. Final report on the safety assessment of Arnica montana extract and Arnica montana.. Int J Toxicol. 2001. PMID 11558636. DOI 10.1080/10915810160233712. (abstract)
  35. Oberbaum M, Galoyan N, Lerner-Geva L et al.. The effect of the homeopathic remedies Arnica montana and Bellis perennis on mild postpartum bleeding--a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study--preliminary results.. Complement Ther Med. 2005. PMID 16036165. DOI 10.1016/j.ctim.2005.03.006. (abstract)
  36. Paulsen E, Chistensen LP, Andersen KE. Cosmetics and herbal remedies with Compositae plant extracts - are they tolerated by Compositae-allergic patients?. Contact Dermatitis. 2008. PMID 18154553. DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01250.x. (abstract)
  37. Pumpa KL, Fallon KE, Bensoussan A et al.. The effects of topical Arnica on performance, pain and muscle damage after intense eccentric exercise.. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014. PMID 23947690. DOI 10.1080/17461391.2013.829126. (abstract)
  38. Reider N, Komericki P, Hausen BM et al.. The seamy side of natural medicines: contact sensitization to arnica (Arnica montana L.) and marigold (Calendula officinalis L.).. Contact Dermatitis. 2001. PMID 11722485. DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.450503.x. (abstract)
  39. Robertson A, Suryanarayanan R, Banerjee A. Homeopathic Arnica montana for post-tonsillectomy analgesia: a randomised placebo control trial.. Homeopathy. 2007. PMID 17227743. DOI 10.1016/j.homp.2006.10.005. (abstract)
  40. Robledo SM, López L, Quintero J et al.. A phase Ib/II clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topical Arnica tincture to treat non-complicated cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia.. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025. PMID 40825042. DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013123. (abstract)
  41. Rywaniak J, Luzak B, Podsedek A et al.. Comparison of cytotoxic and anti-platelet activities of polyphenolic extracts from Arnica montana flowers and Juglans regia husks.. Platelets. 2015. PMID 24679412. DOI 10.3109/09537104.2014.894970. (abstract)
  42. Ryzhaya N, Rivers JK. Myth Versus Reality: A Review of Social Media Claims and Scientific Evidence for Arnica montana in Postinjectable Procedures.. Dermatol Surg. 2025. PMID 40014034. DOI 10.1097/DSS.0000000000004599. (abstract)
  43. Schmidt TJ. Arnica montana L.: Doesn't Origin Matter?. Plants (Basel). 2023. PMID 37895999. DOI 10.3390/plants12203532. (abstract)
  44. Seeley BM, Denton AB, Ahn MS et al.. Effect of homeopathic Arnica montana on bruising in face-lifts: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006. PMID 16415448. DOI 10.1001/archfaci.8.1.54. (abstract)
  45. Simsek G, Sari E, Kilic R et al.. Topical Application of Arnica and Mucopolysaccharide Polysulfate Attenuates Periorbital Edema and Ecchymosis in Open Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016. PMID 26910697. DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000479967.94459.1c. (abstract)
  46. Smith AG, Miles VN, Holmes DT et al.. Clinical Trials, Potential Mechanisms, and Adverse Effects of Arnica as an Adjunct Medication for Pain Management.. Medicines (Basel). 2021. PMID 34677487. DOI 10.3390/medicines8100058. (abstract)
  47. Stack ER, Spongberg CV, O'Neal K et al.. A Systematic Review of Arnica montana in Postoperative Recovery Across Surgical Specialties.. Cureus. 2026. PMID 42698408. DOI 10.7759/cureus.113960. (abstract)
  48. Stevinson C, Devaraj VS, Fountain-Barber A et al.. Homeopathic arnica for prevention of pain and bruising: randomized placebo-controlled trial in hand surgery.. J R Soc Med. 2003. PMID 12562974. DOI 10.1177/014107680309600203. (abstract)
  49. Tao JP, Aakalu VK, Freitag SK et al.. Homeopathic Agents or Vitamins in Reducing Ecchymosis after Oculofacial Surgery: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.. Ophthalmology. 2022. PMID 34176651. DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.05.018. (abstract)
  50. Toma CC, Marrelli M, Puticiu M et al.. Effects of Arnica Phytotherapeutic and Homeopathic Formulations on Traumatic Injuries and Inflammatory Conditions: A Systematic Review.. Plants (Basel). 2024. PMID 39520030. DOI 10.3390/plants13213112. (abstract)
  51. Totonchi A, Guyuron B. A randomized, controlled comparison between arnica and steroids in the management of postrhinoplasty ecchymosis and edema.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007. PMID 17572575. DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000264397.80585.bd. (abstract)
  52. Venkatramani DV, Goel S, Ratra V et al.. Toxic optic neuropathy following ingestion of homeopathic medication Arnica-30.. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2013. PMID 22877081. DOI 10.3109/15569527.2012.708910. (abstract)
  53. Vickers AJ, Fisher P, Smith C et al.. Homeopathic Arnica 30x is ineffective for muscle soreness after long-distance running: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.. Clin J Pain. 1998. PMID 9758072. DOI 10.1097/00002508-199809000-00009. (abstract)
  54. Widrig R, Suter A, Saller R et al.. Choosing between NSAID and arnica for topical treatment of hand osteoarthritis in a randomised, double-blind study.. Rheumatol Int. 2007. PMID 17318618. DOI 10.1007/s00296-007-0304-y. (abstract)
  55. Wolf M, Tamaschke C, Mayer W et al.. [Efficacy of Arnica in varicose vein surgery: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study].. Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd. 2003. PMID 14605480. DOI 10.1159/000074778. (abstract)
  56. n/a. Sources not opened: NCCIH, LiverTox and LactMed arnica entries; Commission E and WHO monographs. n/a. 2026. (summary-only)
  57. van Exsel DCE, Pool SMW, van Uchelen JH et al.. Arnica Ointment 10% Does Not Improve Upper Blepharoplasty Outcome: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016. PMID 27348641. DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002249. (abstract)

Where to buy

Check the label first. Whatever you buy, look for these:

  • The plant part and the extract type or ratio on the label
  • A standardized amount of the active compounds, where relevant
  • A third-party testing mark (USP, NSF or ConsumerLab)
  • Interactions: ask a pharmacist if you take medicines, are pregnant or have a medical condition

Talk to a pharmacist or doctor before you start any supplement, especially if you take medicines. See the Safety tab for interactions.

Browse Arnica on Amazon
Amazon · Several brands to compare
Shop Arnica on Amazon

Support our free guides: as an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Full disclosure.

Education, not medical advice. This page is for general information. It does not diagnose or treat any condition and is not a substitute for care from a qualified health professional. Natural does not automatically mean safe. Ask a clinician or pharmacist before changing your care, especially if you take medication, are pregnant or breastfeeding, or have a health condition.