Skip to content
AlternativeMed

Omega-3 From Food vs Supplements: What Research Compares

Three small trials compared eating fish with fish-oil capsules or cod liver oil on blood omega-3 levels. Here is what they found, and why no one can say which is better for health.

Content last updated . This page has not been medically reviewed.

The question

Is the omega-3 from a plate of fish used by the body the same way as omega-3 from a capsule? And do they lead to the same health results? This page covers the research that compared the two directly. The broader question, with all the evidence for supplements, is on omega-3 supplements vs eating fish.

What the sources define

In these studies "food" means whole fish, such as salmon, albacore tuna or cod. "Supplement" means capsules of fish oil or a liquid cod liver oil. Researchers measured the omega-3 index, which is the share of EPA plus DHA in red blood cells, or EPA and DHA in blood fluid. These are blood levels, not health outcomes.

What research compared

QuestionWhat the source foundStrength of evidence
Fish twice a week vs daily capsules (US, 2007)Healthy premenopausal women got an average of 485 mg of EPA plus DHA a day, either from 2 servings of oily fish (salmon and albacore tuna) a week or from 1 to 2 capsules a day. After 16 weeks, red-cell EPA plus DHA rose from 4.0% to 6.2% (fish group, n = 11) and from 4.3% to 6.2% (capsule group); the group difference was not significant. EPA rose faster with fish in the first 4 weeks. [1]Randomized; very small; blood levels only
Salmon or cod vs cod liver oil (Norway, 2006)71 volunteers ate 400 g of smoked salmon, cooked salmon or cooked cod a week, or took 15 mL a day of cod liver oil, for 8 weeks. Blood EPA and DHA rose more with cooked salmon (129% EPA, 45% DHA) than with cod liver oil (106% and 25%), although the oil gave 3.0 g of EPA plus DHA a day against 1.2 g from salmon. Blood lipids and inflammation markers did not change significantly. [2]Randomized; one oil; blood levels only
Canned salmon and albacore vs capsules (US, 2015)25 women at high risk of breast cancer got comparable marine omega-3 doses for 3 months. Both routes raised EPA and DHA in plasma, red cells and breast fat. The capsule group had a larger plasma and red-cell EPA change (about fourfold versus twofold); DHA and breast-fat increases were similar. [3]Randomized; very small; specific high-risk group

What food offers besides omega-3

The FDA lists iron, iodine (during pregnancy) and choline among the nutrients fish provide for a child's brain development, says fish provide iron and zinc to support children's immune systems, and calls fish a source of protein, vitamin B12, vitamin D and selenium. [4] A fish-oil capsule is not described in these sources as supplying those nutrients. Food also comes with mercury limits for some groups; capsules have their own quality issues, covered on fish oil purity and quality testing and certifications.

What official bodies say about food

  • US (AHA, quoted by MedlinePlus): at least 2 servings a week of fish rich in omega-3s; a serving is 3.5 ounces (100 grams). [5]
  • UK (NHS): at least 2 portions of fish a week, including 1 of oily fish. [6]
  • EU (EFSA, 2012): 250 mg a day of EPA plus DHA described as an adequate intake. [7]

These are statements about food. Who may consider a supplement is discussed on are omega-3 supplements necessary. A clinician or pharmacist can say what is suitable for a given person.

Frequently asked questions

Is eating fish better than taking fish oil?

The sources we read do not say so. Three small trials found similar or higher blood levels from fish, but none measured health outcomes. [1][2][3]

Do fish and capsules raise blood omega-3 equally?

In one trial, yes at an average 485 mg of EPA plus DHA a day; in another, cooked salmon raised levels more than cod liver oil. [1][2]

Are the heart benefits of fish the same as fish oil?

Not assumed. The FDA's statement is about eating fish as part of an eating pattern. [4]

How much fish should I eat?

It depends on the country; the NHS says at least 2 portions a week with 1 oily. [6] See the mercury page for limits.

Do I need a supplement if I eat fish?

The sources do not answer that for individuals. Ask a clinician or pharmacist.

More details: evidence, limits and cautions

The details behind this page: cautions, limits of the evidence and where sources disagree. Open any note to read it.

Safety and practical points first
How to read this
  • The three trials measured blood and tissue levels. None tested heart attacks, strokes, memory or any disease. Biomarker change is not a clinical outcome.
  • Results differ by trial. In two, fish and capsules were similar; in one, fish raised blood levels more than cod liver oil despite a smaller amount of EPA plus DHA. [1][2]
  • Each trial tested one set of foods and one kind of oil. Do not carry the result to krill oil, algal oil or prescription products. See fish oil vs krill oil for that comparison.
  • Do not move results from fish to capsules: the evidence that eating fish may help the heart is about eating fish as part of an eating pattern. [4] Large capsule trials are covered on omega-3 evidence by use, and the reasons trials disagree are on why omega-3 trials disagree.
  • Head-to-head trials of fish versus capsules on health outcomes: Proper evidence not found. We searched PubMed for trials comparing fish with fish-oil capsules and found the three above plus related blood-level studies; none measured disease outcomes.
References
Education, not medical advice. This page is for general information. It does not diagnose or treat any condition and is not a substitute for care from a qualified health professional. Natural does not automatically mean safe. Ask a clinician or pharmacist before changing your care, especially if you take medication, are pregnant or breastfeeding, or have a health condition.