Skip to content
AlternativeMed

Evidence-Based Integrative Care: What Mainstream Guidelines Already Recommend

Where mainstream medical-society and national guidelines already recommend exercise, tai chi, yoga, acupuncture and CBT, for which conditions, with evidence strength stated.

Content last updated . This page has not been medically reviewed.

Why this page exists

"Integrative" care is often described as something outside mainstream medicine. In fact, several approaches used in integrative and naturopathic settings, such as exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy, tai chi, yoga and acupuncture, appear in guidelines written by medical societies and national health bodies. This page shows which approaches, for which conditions, and how strongly. It is information only. A guideline recommendation is not a promise that a treatment will work for you, and it does not replace advice from your own clinician.

How to read a guideline

Guidelines grade both the strength of a recommendation and the quality of the evidence behind it, and the two can differ. The American College of Physicians (ACP), for example, made a strong recommendation for several back-pain options that rest on low-quality evidence. [1] The American College of Rheumatology says recommendations should be used in shared decision-making that accounts for a person's values, preferences and other conditions. [2] We read only the published abstracts or recommendation pages, so details in the full guidelines may differ. Check for newer versions.

What mainstream guidelines include

ConditionGuidelineApproaches includedEvidence label
Low back painACP, 2017 (US)Acute: heat, massage, acupuncture or spinal manipulation (low-quality evidence). Chronic: exercise, multidisciplinary rehabilitation, acupuncture and mindfulness-based stress reduction (moderate-quality), tai chi, yoga and others (low-quality), as first choices before medicines. [1]Promising but limited to established, by option
Chronic primary painNICE NG193, 2021 (UK)Offer a supervised group exercise program; consider acceptance and commitment therapy or CBT; consider a single course of acupuncture or dry needling under stated conditions. [3]Promising but limited
Hip and knee osteoarthritisACR and Arthritis Foundation, 2019 (US)Strong: exercise, weight loss if overweight, self-management programs, tai chi. Conditional: balance exercises, yoga, CBT, acupuncture, thermal modalities. [2]Established (exercise) to promising but limited (conditional items)
Chronic insomniaACP, 2016 (US)CBT for insomnia as the initial treatment (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). [4]Established
Irritable bowel syndromeAmerican College of Gastroenterology, 2021 (US)A limited trial of a low-FODMAP diet, and gut-directed psychotherapy. [5]Established to promising, by item
Cancer symptomsSIO-ASCO (US)Mind-body practices, acupuncture and others for specific symptoms; see integrative oncology guidelines.Promising but limited
Heart healthAmerican Heart Association advisory, 2022Life's Essential 8 includes diet, physical activity, nicotine exposure and sleep health alongside body mass index, lipids, glucose and blood pressure. [6]Framework (advisory)

What guidelines do not support

Being included in one guideline for one condition does not extend to other uses. For example, an oncology guideline found no strong evidence that ingested dietary supplements manage breast cancer treatment side effects. [8] For detox programs, chelation, IV drips and broad lab panels, see our claim checks: detox programs and chelation and IV vitamin and ozone therapy claims.

Who provides these approaches

Exercise programs, psychological therapies, acupuncture and manipulation are delivered by different professions with different training, and titles, licenses and scope differ by state and country. See credentials, titles and scope of practice and coordinating complementary and medical care.

Proper evidence not found that the guidelines in this set recommend detox programs, food IgG testing or IV vitamin therapy. We searched the abstracts and pages listed in the sources for these terms; this does not rule out mentions in full-text guidelines we did not read.

Frequently asked questions

Does a guideline recommendation make a therapy "mainstream"?

It means a guideline panel judged the evidence for one use in one group of people. It does not cover other uses. For example, the ACP back-pain abstract does not mention detox or supplement programs. [1]

Do guidelines recommend tai chi?

Yes for some conditions. ACR strongly recommends tai chi for hip and knee osteoarthritis, [2] and ACP lists it as a chronic back pain option based on low-quality evidence. [1]

Is acupuncture recommended in guidelines?

For some uses and with conditions. ACP lists it for back pain, [1] NICE allows a single course for chronic primary pain under conditions, [3] and ACR conditionally recommends it for osteoarthritis. [2]

What is the first-line treatment for chronic insomnia?

ACP recommends CBT for insomnia as the initial treatment. [4] See CBT for insomnia.

Why do some guidelines recommend things others do not?

They ask different questions, search different studies and use different grading. NICE advises against biofeedback for chronic primary pain, [3] while ACP lists electromyography biofeedback as a back pain option. [1]

More details: evidence, limits and cautions

The details behind this page: cautions, limits of the evidence and where sources disagree. Open any note to read it.

Where guidelines disagree
Guidelines do not always match. ACP lists electromyography biofeedback among options for chronic low back pain, [1] while NICE says not to offer biofeedback for chronic primary pain. [3] NICE also says not to offer TENS, ultrasound or interferential therapy for chronic primary pain, because there is no evidence of benefit. [3] NCCIH notes that the ACP guideline recommends massage as an option for acute low back pain, based on low-quality evidence, but not for chronic low back pain. [7] Differences can reflect the conditions defined, the studies searched and the dates; we read only abstracts and recommendation pages and did not compare the full guidelines.

Acupuncture shows how a label can hide detail: ACP lists it as an option for back pain, [1] NICE allows a single course only if conditions on setting and cost are met, [3] and ACR gives it a conditional recommendation. [2] For what acupuncture is, see what is acupuncture.

Safety and who should check first
NCCIH says the psychological and physical approaches it studied for chronic pain have good safety records, but that does not mean they are risk-free for everyone, and circumstances such as pregnancy may affect safety. [7] Check with a clinician first if you are pregnant, have heart or lung disease, osteoporosis, a bleeding disorder or take blood thinners, are older, have cancer, or are planning surgery. Do not stop or change prescribed medicines because a guideline lists a non-drug option.
References
Education, not medical advice. This page is for general information. It does not diagnose or treat any condition and is not a substitute for care from a qualified health professional. Natural does not automatically mean safe. Ask a clinician or pharmacist before changing your care, especially if you take medication, are pregnant or breastfeeding, or have a health condition.